30-Day Outcomes of Real-World Elective Carotid Stenosis Treatment Using a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent (ROADSAVER Study).

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ralf Langhoff, Zsolt Vajda, Piotr Odrowąż-Pieniążek, Aleksandar Gjoreski, Roel Beelen, Koen Deloose, Balázs Nemes, Zoltán Ruzsa, Jean-Luc Banos, Sérgio Castro, Benjamin Faurie, Torsten Fuß, Michael Piorkowski, Istvan Király, Ivan Vulev, Arne Schwindt, Péter Csécsei, Alejandro Tomasello Weitz, Tomáš Jonszta, Paweł Latacz, Jorge Galván Fernández, Jürgen Verbist, Henrik Schröder, Christiane Pöckler-Schöniger, Karlis Kupcs, Pascual Lozano Vilardell, Rubén Rodríguez Carvajal, Kim Daenens, Matthias Tenholt, Peter Blaško, Olivier François, José Luis Diaz Valiño, Francisco Javier Martínez Gámez, Volker Sesselmann, Pál Bárzo, Wiebke Kurre, Mikel Terceño Izaga, Antonio Orgaz Pérez-Grueso, Karol Suppan, Jiří Lacman, José Angel Larrea Peña, Jordi Blasco, Reinoud Bokkers, Vladimir Cvetić, Viktor Till, Heliodoro Vallés González, Martin Andrassy, Daniel van den Heuvel, Jürgen Köhler, Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck, Sasko Kedev
{"title":"30-Day Outcomes of Real-World Elective Carotid Stenosis Treatment Using a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent (ROADSAVER Study).","authors":"Ralf Langhoff, Zsolt Vajda, Piotr Odrowąż-Pieniążek, Aleksandar Gjoreski, Roel Beelen, Koen Deloose, Balázs Nemes, Zoltán Ruzsa, Jean-Luc Banos, Sérgio Castro, Benjamin Faurie, Torsten Fuß, Michael Piorkowski, Istvan Király, Ivan Vulev, Arne Schwindt, Péter Csécsei, Alejandro Tomasello Weitz, Tomáš Jonszta, Paweł Latacz, Jorge Galván Fernández, Jürgen Verbist, Henrik Schröder, Christiane Pöckler-Schöniger, Karlis Kupcs, Pascual Lozano Vilardell, Rubén Rodríguez Carvajal, Kim Daenens, Matthias Tenholt, Peter Blaško, Olivier François, José Luis Diaz Valiño, Francisco Javier Martínez Gámez, Volker Sesselmann, Pál Bárzo, Wiebke Kurre, Mikel Terceño Izaga, Antonio Orgaz Pérez-Grueso, Karol Suppan, Jiří Lacman, José Angel Larrea Peña, Jordi Blasco, Reinoud Bokkers, Vladimir Cvetić, Viktor Till, Heliodoro Vallés González, Martin Andrassy, Daniel van den Heuvel, Jürgen Köhler, Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck, Sasko Kedev","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04003-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Carotid artery stenting with single-layer stents carries a risk of periprocedural cerebral embolization compared to carotid endarterectomy. Dual-layer micromesh stents were designed for improved plaque coverage and sustained embolic protection. This analysis aimed to confirm the Roadsaver dual-layer micromesh stent safety in a real-world carotid artery stenting cohort.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>ROADSAVER was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, observational study. Patients with carotid artery stenosis, eligible for elective stenting, were enrolled at 52 sites across 13 European countries. All procedures followed standard practice. The primary outcome was the 30-day major adverse event rate, defined as the cumulative incidence of any death or stroke. All deaths, strokes, and carotid artery revascularizations were independently adjudicated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1965 patients were analysed (mean age 70.6 ± 8.8 years). Cerebral ischaemia symptoms were present in 49.4% of participants. Radial/ulnar access was used in 26.3% of cases and embolic protection in 63.8%. The 30-day major adverse event incidence was 2.2% (1.6% in asymptomatic and 2.8% in symptomatic patients), with any stroke at 1.9%, any death at 0.8%, and stroke-related death at 0.5%. Predictors of higher 30-day major adverse event risk, identified through multivariable modelling, included residual stenosis ≥ 30%, thromboembolic venous disease, previous myocardial infarction, age ≥ 75 years, family history of atherosclerosis, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, symptomatic carotid stenosis, and stent length.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dual-layer micromesh carotid artery stenting is safe, with a low 30-day major adverse event incidence in real-world asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, supporting the sustained embolic protection design concept.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2, observational study (with dramatic effect).</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"427-437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11958397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-04003-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Carotid artery stenting with single-layer stents carries a risk of periprocedural cerebral embolization compared to carotid endarterectomy. Dual-layer micromesh stents were designed for improved plaque coverage and sustained embolic protection. This analysis aimed to confirm the Roadsaver dual-layer micromesh stent safety in a real-world carotid artery stenting cohort.

Materials and methods: ROADSAVER was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, observational study. Patients with carotid artery stenosis, eligible for elective stenting, were enrolled at 52 sites across 13 European countries. All procedures followed standard practice. The primary outcome was the 30-day major adverse event rate, defined as the cumulative incidence of any death or stroke. All deaths, strokes, and carotid artery revascularizations were independently adjudicated.

Results: In total, 1965 patients were analysed (mean age 70.6 ± 8.8 years). Cerebral ischaemia symptoms were present in 49.4% of participants. Radial/ulnar access was used in 26.3% of cases and embolic protection in 63.8%. The 30-day major adverse event incidence was 2.2% (1.6% in asymptomatic and 2.8% in symptomatic patients), with any stroke at 1.9%, any death at 0.8%, and stroke-related death at 0.5%. Predictors of higher 30-day major adverse event risk, identified through multivariable modelling, included residual stenosis ≥ 30%, thromboembolic venous disease, previous myocardial infarction, age ≥ 75 years, family history of atherosclerosis, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, symptomatic carotid stenosis, and stent length.

Conclusion: Dual-layer micromesh carotid artery stenting is safe, with a low 30-day major adverse event incidence in real-world asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, supporting the sustained embolic protection design concept.

Level of evidence: Level 2, observational study (with dramatic effect).

使用双层微孔支架治疗选择性颈动脉狭窄的30天结果(ROADSAVER研究)。
目的:与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,单层颈动脉支架置入术有围术期脑栓塞的风险。双层微孔支架设计用于改善斑块覆盖和持续的栓塞保护。本分析旨在确认Roadsaver双层微孔支架在现实世界颈动脉支架队列中的安全性。材料和方法:ROADSAVER是一项前瞻性、单臂、多中心、观察性研究。符合择期支架置入条件的颈动脉狭窄患者在13个欧洲国家的52个地点入组。所有程序都遵循标准操作。主要终点是30天主要不良事件发生率,定义为任何死亡或中风的累积发生率。所有死亡、中风和颈动脉重建术均独立判定。结果:共分析1965例患者(平均年龄70.6±8.8岁)。49.4%的参与者出现脑缺血症状。桡骨/尺侧通路占26.3%,栓塞保护占63.8%。30天主要不良事件发生率为2.2%(无症状患者为1.6%,有症状患者为2.8%),卒中发生率为1.9%,死亡发生率为0.8%,卒中相关死亡发生率为0.5%。通过多变量模型确定的30天主要不良事件风险较高的预测因子包括残余狭窄≥30%、血栓栓塞性静脉疾病、既往心肌梗死、年龄≥75岁、动脉粥样硬化家族史、非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病、症状性颈动脉狭窄和支架长度。结论:双层微孔颈动脉支架置入是安全的,在现实世界无症状和有症状患者中30天主要不良事件发生率低,支持持续栓塞保护设计理念。证据等级:2级,观察性研究(有显著效果)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信