External validity of randomized clinical trials in vascular surgery: systematic review of demographic factors of patients recruited to randomized clinical trials with comparison to the National Vascular Registry.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae156
Joseph Cutteridge, Joseph Barsby, Samuel Hume, Hamish A L Lemmey, Regent Lee, Katarzyna D Bera
{"title":"External validity of randomized clinical trials in vascular surgery: systematic review of demographic factors of patients recruited to randomized clinical trials with comparison to the National Vascular Registry.","authors":"Joseph Cutteridge, Joseph Barsby, Samuel Hume, Hamish A L Lemmey, Regent Lee, Katarzyna D Bera","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based medicine relies on randomized clinical trials, which should represent the patients encountered in clinical practice. Characteristics of patients recruited to randomized clinical trials involving vascular index operations (carotid endarterectomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, infrainguinal bypass and major lower limb amputations) were compared with those recorded in the National Vascular Registry across England and Wales.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov and World Health Organization International Trials Registry Platform (CRD42021247905) were searched for randomized clinical trials involving the index operations. Demographic (age, sex, ethnicity) and clinical (co-morbidities, medications, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, cognition) data were extracted, by operation. Characteristics of operated on patients were extracted from publicly available National Vascular Registry reports (2014-2020). All findings are reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Rayyan.AI, Excel and GraphPad Prism were used for screening and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 307 randomized clinical trials (66 449 patients) were included and compared with National Vascular Registry data for 119 019 patients. Randomized clinical trial patients were younger across all operations; for carotid endarterectomy, bypass and major lower limb amputation randomized clinical trials, there were differences in female patient representation. Further comparisons were limited by the insufficient baseline data reporting across randomized clinical trials, though reporting improved over decades. National Vascular Registry reports lacked information on patient factors such as patient ethnicity or body mass index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are significant differences in demographic and clinical factors between patients recruited to vascular surgery randomized clinical trials and the real-world National Vascular Registry vascular surgery patient population. Minimum reporting standards for baseline data should be defined to allow future randomized clinical trials to represent real-world patient populations and ensure the external validity of their results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based medicine relies on randomized clinical trials, which should represent the patients encountered in clinical practice. Characteristics of patients recruited to randomized clinical trials involving vascular index operations (carotid endarterectomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, infrainguinal bypass and major lower limb amputations) were compared with those recorded in the National Vascular Registry across England and Wales.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov and World Health Organization International Trials Registry Platform (CRD42021247905) were searched for randomized clinical trials involving the index operations. Demographic (age, sex, ethnicity) and clinical (co-morbidities, medications, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, cognition) data were extracted, by operation. Characteristics of operated on patients were extracted from publicly available National Vascular Registry reports (2014-2020). All findings are reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Rayyan.AI, Excel and GraphPad Prism were used for screening and analysis.

Results: A total of 307 randomized clinical trials (66 449 patients) were included and compared with National Vascular Registry data for 119 019 patients. Randomized clinical trial patients were younger across all operations; for carotid endarterectomy, bypass and major lower limb amputation randomized clinical trials, there were differences in female patient representation. Further comparisons were limited by the insufficient baseline data reporting across randomized clinical trials, though reporting improved over decades. National Vascular Registry reports lacked information on patient factors such as patient ethnicity or body mass index.

Conclusions: There are significant differences in demographic and clinical factors between patients recruited to vascular surgery randomized clinical trials and the real-world National Vascular Registry vascular surgery patient population. Minimum reporting standards for baseline data should be defined to allow future randomized clinical trials to represent real-world patient populations and ensure the external validity of their results.

血管外科随机临床试验的外部有效性:随机临床试验患者的人口学因素的系统评价,并与国家血管登记处进行比较。
背景:循证医学依赖于随机临床试验,它应该代表临床实践中遇到的患者。将随机临床试验中涉及血管指数手术(颈动脉内膜切除术、腹主动脉瘤修复、腹股沟下搭桥和下肢主要截肢)的患者的特征与英格兰和威尔士国家血管登记处记录的患者进行比较。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、CENTRAL、clinicaltrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际试验注册平台(CRD42021247905)中涉及索引操作的随机临床试验。通过手术提取人口统计学(年龄、性别、种族)和临床(合并症、药物、体重指数、吸烟、饮酒、认知)数据。手术患者的特征提取自可公开获得的国家血管登记报告(2014-2020)。所有发现均根据PRISMA指南进行报告。Rayyan。使用AI、Excel、GraphPad Prism进行筛选分析。结果:共纳入307项随机临床试验(66449例患者),并与11919例患者的National Vascular Registry数据进行比较。随机临床试验患者在所有手术中均较年轻;在颈动脉内膜切除术、旁路手术和下肢主要截肢的随机临床试验中,女性患者的代表性存在差异。进一步的比较受到随机临床试验基线数据报告不足的限制,尽管报告在过去几十年中有所改进。国家血管登记处的报告缺乏患者因素的信息,如患者种族或体重指数。结论:血管外科随机临床试验患者与现实世界国家血管登记血管外科患者人群在人口统计学和临床因素方面存在显著差异。应确定基线数据的最低报告标准,以使未来的随机临床试验能够代表现实世界的患者群体,并确保其结果的外部有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信