Comparing swimming starts of flat and deep trajectory underwater movements performed by adolescent male swimmers.

Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-03-18 Print Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.37190/abb-02500-2024-02
Leszek Nosiadek, Łukasz Wądrzyk, Robert Staszkiewicz
{"title":"Comparing swimming starts of flat and deep trajectory underwater movements performed by adolescent male swimmers.","authors":"Leszek Nosiadek, Łukasz Wądrzyk, Robert Staszkiewicz","doi":"10.37190/abb-02500-2024-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: Biomechanical analyses of the swimming start performed by the best swimmers indicates the occurrence of a few effective start types. This issue has only been described to a small degree among adolescent swimmers. The objective is to determine kinematic differences in various parts of the swimming start to the front crawl among adolescent swimmers performing a start with flat (FT) or deep underwater trajectory (DT). <i>Methods</i>: The study comprised 32 male swimmers aged 16-19 (average World Aquatics score = 556 ± 88 points). The trials were recorded using two cameras (above- and underwater). A kinematic analysis of the time from start to attain 5 m was performed. <i>Results</i>: The maximum submersion depth was 0.94 ± 0.09 m (FT) and 1.21 ± 0.11 m (DT). Between-group differences were observed for FT and DT, respectively, in: attack angle at the submersion (38.37 ± 6.85° and 44.90 ± 6.08°), the distance of maximum submersion depth (5.24 ± 0.36 m and 5.58 ± 0.50 m) and underwater angles of attack during submersion (angle of the shoulders at the of submersion: 29.40 ± 3.90° and 34.30 ± 4.14°, angle of the hips at the submersion: 21.70 ± 4.52° and 26.49 ± 5.05°). <i>Conclusions</i>: It was found that swimmers can successfully use different start variants. The underwater trajectory is primarily influenced by the body position at the moment the fingers contact with the water and during submersion, and not only by the manner of performing the push-off. The authors conclude that the characteristics of the start should not be based on one variable or its selected start phase - the description of the technique should comprise a set of kinematic indices from its different parts.</p>","PeriodicalId":519996,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"26 4","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02500-2024-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Biomechanical analyses of the swimming start performed by the best swimmers indicates the occurrence of a few effective start types. This issue has only been described to a small degree among adolescent swimmers. The objective is to determine kinematic differences in various parts of the swimming start to the front crawl among adolescent swimmers performing a start with flat (FT) or deep underwater trajectory (DT). Methods: The study comprised 32 male swimmers aged 16-19 (average World Aquatics score = 556 ± 88 points). The trials were recorded using two cameras (above- and underwater). A kinematic analysis of the time from start to attain 5 m was performed. Results: The maximum submersion depth was 0.94 ± 0.09 m (FT) and 1.21 ± 0.11 m (DT). Between-group differences were observed for FT and DT, respectively, in: attack angle at the submersion (38.37 ± 6.85° and 44.90 ± 6.08°), the distance of maximum submersion depth (5.24 ± 0.36 m and 5.58 ± 0.50 m) and underwater angles of attack during submersion (angle of the shoulders at the of submersion: 29.40 ± 3.90° and 34.30 ± 4.14°, angle of the hips at the submersion: 21.70 ± 4.52° and 26.49 ± 5.05°). Conclusions: It was found that swimmers can successfully use different start variants. The underwater trajectory is primarily influenced by the body position at the moment the fingers contact with the water and during submersion, and not only by the manner of performing the push-off. The authors conclude that the characteristics of the start should not be based on one variable or its selected start phase - the description of the technique should comprise a set of kinematic indices from its different parts.

青少年男子游泳运动员水下平、深轨迹起跳的比较。
目的:对优秀游泳运动员的起跑进行生物力学分析,指出了几种有效起跑类型的存在。这个问题只在青少年游泳者中被描述到很小的程度。目的是确定青少年游泳运动员进行平(FT)或深水(DT)起跳时游泳起跳到前爬泳的各个部分的运动学差异。方法:选取32名年龄在16 ~ 19岁的男子游泳运动员(世界游泳平均得分= 556±88分)。这些试验是用两台摄像机(水上和水下)记录下来的。从开始到达到5米的时间进行了运动学分析。结果:最大浸没深度为0.94±0.09 m (FT)和1.21±0.11 m (DT)。FT和DT组间差异分别为:潜水时攻角(38.37±6.85°和44.90±6.08°)、最大潜水深度距离(5.24±0.36 m和5.58±0.50 m)和潜水时水下攻角(潜水时肩部角度:29.40±3.90°和34.30±4.14°,髋部角度:21.70±4.52°和26.49±5.05°)。结论:我们发现游泳运动员可以成功地使用不同的起跑方式。水下轨迹主要受身体位置的影响,在那一刻,手指接触水和潜水期间,而不仅仅是执行推离的方式。作者得出结论,起动特性不应基于一个变量或其选定的起动阶段-技术的描述应包括一组来自其不同部分的运动学指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信