A Pilot Study Assessing the Utility of Quantitative Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Measurements in Detecting Posttraumatic Infection.

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001228
Grant E O'Keefe, Yiyang Wu, Nina Mirabadi, Minjun Apodaca, Qian Qui, Chihiro Morishima
{"title":"A Pilot Study Assessing the Utility of Quantitative Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Measurements in Detecting Posttraumatic Infection.","authors":"Grant E O'Keefe, Yiyang Wu, Nina Mirabadi, Minjun Apodaca, Qian Qui, Chihiro Morishima","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Biomarkers that facilitate earlier diagnosis of posttraumatic infection could improve outcomes by expediting treatment and mitigating complications, including sepsis. We hypothesized that circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) counts could identify patients with posttraumatic infection.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and patients: </strong>We conducted a single-center, prospective observational pilot study of trauma victims who required greater than or equal to 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. Whole blood was collected and tested by flow cytometry.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Samples were analyzed in real-time with an 11-parameter quantitative MDSC assay. Two physician adjudications of infection were performed through a blinded review of medical records. MDSC and other cell counts were compared between subjects with and without posttraumatic infection using non-parametric methods. Data are presented as medians (25th-75th percentile). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the accuracy of cell counts for diagnosing infection. Most subjects (n = 39) were male (79%) with a median age of 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 32-65), Injury Severity Score of 29 (IQR 21-41), and ICU length of stay of 13 days (IQR 8-19). Twenty-one (54%) developed an infection and 11 (28%) of the cohort died. We compared total MDSC (T-MDSC) counts closest to the day of infection diagnosis with the initial T-MDSC counts in subjects without infection. T-MDSC counts were higher in those with infection compared to those without infection (696 [368-974] and 304 [181-404] cells/μL, respectively; p < 0.001). Lymphocyte, neutrophil, and CD45+ leukocyte counts were not statistically different between the groups. The area under the ROC curve distinguishing those with infection from those without for T-MDSC was 0.83 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDSC counts determined by quantitative whole blood flow cytometrics can detect posttraumatic infection and may be useful to guide further diagnostic testing in critically ill trauma victims.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 3","pages":"e1228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Biomarkers that facilitate earlier diagnosis of posttraumatic infection could improve outcomes by expediting treatment and mitigating complications, including sepsis. We hypothesized that circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) counts could identify patients with posttraumatic infection.

Design, setting, and patients: We conducted a single-center, prospective observational pilot study of trauma victims who required greater than or equal to 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. Whole blood was collected and tested by flow cytometry.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Samples were analyzed in real-time with an 11-parameter quantitative MDSC assay. Two physician adjudications of infection were performed through a blinded review of medical records. MDSC and other cell counts were compared between subjects with and without posttraumatic infection using non-parametric methods. Data are presented as medians (25th-75th percentile). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the accuracy of cell counts for diagnosing infection. Most subjects (n = 39) were male (79%) with a median age of 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 32-65), Injury Severity Score of 29 (IQR 21-41), and ICU length of stay of 13 days (IQR 8-19). Twenty-one (54%) developed an infection and 11 (28%) of the cohort died. We compared total MDSC (T-MDSC) counts closest to the day of infection diagnosis with the initial T-MDSC counts in subjects without infection. T-MDSC counts were higher in those with infection compared to those without infection (696 [368-974] and 304 [181-404] cells/μL, respectively; p < 0.001). Lymphocyte, neutrophil, and CD45+ leukocyte counts were not statistically different between the groups. The area under the ROC curve distinguishing those with infection from those without for T-MDSC was 0.83 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: MDSC counts determined by quantitative whole blood flow cytometrics can detect posttraumatic infection and may be useful to guide further diagnostic testing in critically ill trauma victims.

一项初步研究评估定量髓源性抑制细胞测量在检测创伤后感染中的效用。
目的:促进创伤后感染早期诊断的生物标志物可以通过加速治疗和减轻并发症(包括败血症)来改善结果。我们假设循环髓源性抑制细胞(MDSC)计数可以识别创伤后感染患者。设计、环境和患者:我们对需要大于或等于48小时机械通气的创伤患者进行了一项单中心、前瞻性观察性试点研究。采集全血,流式细胞术检测。干预措施:没有。测量结果及主要结果:采用11参数定量MDSC法对样品进行实时分析。通过对医疗记录的盲法审查,进行了两项感染的医生裁决。使用非参数方法比较创伤后感染和非创伤后感染受试者的MDSC和其他细胞计数。数据以中位数(25 -75百分位)表示。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积用于评估细胞计数诊断感染的准确性。大多数受试者(n = 39)为男性(79%),中位年龄48岁(四分位间距[IQR] 32-65),损伤严重程度评分29 (IQR 21-41), ICU住院时间13天(IQR 8-19)。21例(54%)发生感染,11例(28%)死亡。我们比较了最接近感染诊断当天的总MDSC (T-MDSC)计数与未感染受试者的初始T-MDSC计数。感染组T-MDSC计数高于未感染组,分别为696[368-974]和304[181-404]细胞/μL;P < 0.001)。淋巴细胞、中性粒细胞和CD45+白细胞计数在两组间无统计学差异。T-MDSC感染与未感染的ROC曲线下面积为0.83 (p < 0.001)。结论:定量全血流式细胞术检测MDSC计数可以检测创伤后感染,并可用于指导危重症创伤患者的进一步诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信