A Pilot Study Assessing the Utility of Quantitative Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Measurements in Detecting Posttraumatic Infection.

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001228
Grant E O'Keefe, Yiyang Wu, Nina Mirabadi, Minjun Apodaca, Qian Qui, Chihiro Morishima
{"title":"A Pilot Study Assessing the Utility of Quantitative Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Measurements in Detecting Posttraumatic Infection.","authors":"Grant E O'Keefe, Yiyang Wu, Nina Mirabadi, Minjun Apodaca, Qian Qui, Chihiro Morishima","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Biomarkers that facilitate earlier diagnosis of posttraumatic infection could improve outcomes by expediting treatment and mitigating complications, including sepsis. We hypothesized that circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) counts could identify patients with posttraumatic infection.</p><p><strong>Design setting and patients: </strong>We conducted a single-center, prospective observational pilot study of trauma victims who required greater than or equal to 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. Whole blood was collected and tested by flow cytometry.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Samples were analyzed in real-time with an 11-parameter quantitative MDSC assay. Two physician adjudications of infection were performed through a blinded review of medical records. MDSC and other cell counts were compared between subjects with and without posttraumatic infection using non-parametric methods. Data are presented as medians (25th-75th percentile). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the accuracy of cell counts for diagnosing infection. Most subjects (<i>n</i> = 39) were male (79%) with a median age of 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 32-65), Injury Severity Score of 29 (IQR 21-41), and ICU length of stay of 13 days (IQR 8-19). Twenty-one (54%) developed an infection and 11 (28%) of the cohort died. We compared total MDSC (T-MDSC) counts closest to the day of infection diagnosis with the initial T-MDSC counts in subjects without infection. T-MDSC counts were higher in those with infection compared to those without infection (696 [368-974] and 304 [181-404] cells/μL, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Lymphocyte, neutrophil, and CD45+ leukocyte counts were not statistically different between the groups. The area under the ROC curve distinguishing those with infection from those without for T-MDSC was 0.83 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDSC counts determined by quantitative whole blood flow cytometrics can detect posttraumatic infection and may be useful to guide further diagnostic testing in critically ill trauma victims.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 3","pages":"e1228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Biomarkers that facilitate earlier diagnosis of posttraumatic infection could improve outcomes by expediting treatment and mitigating complications, including sepsis. We hypothesized that circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) counts could identify patients with posttraumatic infection.

Design setting and patients: We conducted a single-center, prospective observational pilot study of trauma victims who required greater than or equal to 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. Whole blood was collected and tested by flow cytometry.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Samples were analyzed in real-time with an 11-parameter quantitative MDSC assay. Two physician adjudications of infection were performed through a blinded review of medical records. MDSC and other cell counts were compared between subjects with and without posttraumatic infection using non-parametric methods. Data are presented as medians (25th-75th percentile). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the accuracy of cell counts for diagnosing infection. Most subjects (n = 39) were male (79%) with a median age of 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 32-65), Injury Severity Score of 29 (IQR 21-41), and ICU length of stay of 13 days (IQR 8-19). Twenty-one (54%) developed an infection and 11 (28%) of the cohort died. We compared total MDSC (T-MDSC) counts closest to the day of infection diagnosis with the initial T-MDSC counts in subjects without infection. T-MDSC counts were higher in those with infection compared to those without infection (696 [368-974] and 304 [181-404] cells/μL, respectively; p < 0.001). Lymphocyte, neutrophil, and CD45+ leukocyte counts were not statistically different between the groups. The area under the ROC curve distinguishing those with infection from those without for T-MDSC was 0.83 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: MDSC counts determined by quantitative whole blood flow cytometrics can detect posttraumatic infection and may be useful to guide further diagnostic testing in critically ill trauma victims.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信