Community health in Victoria: a history of challenges, adaptations and potential.

Virginia Lewis, Jennifer Macmillan, T McBride, David Legge
{"title":"Community health in Victoria: a history of challenges, adaptations and potential.","authors":"Virginia Lewis, Jennifer Macmillan, T McBride, David Legge","doi":"10.1071/PY24194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The Whitlam Labor government established the Community Health Program (CHP) in Australia in 1973 to improve access to health and related welfare services nationally. States reacted differently to the program. Designated Australian Government funding for the program ended in 1981. In spite of fluctuating state government support and changing legislative frameworks over time, Victoria is the only state that continues to operate a generic community health centre (CHC) program reflecting the original CHP. Methods Data were collected from policy documents and archival material, as well as interviews with 29 key stake holders from Victoria. Transcripts from the interviews were reviewed by the interviewees and permission given to include identifiable quotes. The research is part of a larger Australian Research Council project looking at the history of community health in Australia. Results In Victoria the CHP broke new ground in several respects including creating a public primary health care (PHC) sector, promoting equitable access to PHC, introducing salaried GPs, creating multidisciplinary PHC teams, valuing community involvement (in planning, accountability, health promotion) and taking action on the social determinants of health. Key stakeholders described the challenges that the sector has faced in the decades from 1973 to the current day. The basis for the sector's survival ultimately rests with how it was initially established and the cultural environment in which it developed and continues to operate. In addition to the (albeit irregular) geographically wide distribution of CHCs, their high level of public recognition and sense of community ownership were seen as critical factors that aided their survival and worked against their closure or absorption into hospital networks. Conclusions Based on a synthesis of our findings and personal experiences, we propose five new directions for policy, management and practice that could support this model to have a greater contribution to the health system in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The Whitlam Labor government established the Community Health Program (CHP) in Australia in 1973 to improve access to health and related welfare services nationally. States reacted differently to the program. Designated Australian Government funding for the program ended in 1981. In spite of fluctuating state government support and changing legislative frameworks over time, Victoria is the only state that continues to operate a generic community health centre (CHC) program reflecting the original CHP. Methods Data were collected from policy documents and archival material, as well as interviews with 29 key stake holders from Victoria. Transcripts from the interviews were reviewed by the interviewees and permission given to include identifiable quotes. The research is part of a larger Australian Research Council project looking at the history of community health in Australia. Results In Victoria the CHP broke new ground in several respects including creating a public primary health care (PHC) sector, promoting equitable access to PHC, introducing salaried GPs, creating multidisciplinary PHC teams, valuing community involvement (in planning, accountability, health promotion) and taking action on the social determinants of health. Key stakeholders described the challenges that the sector has faced in the decades from 1973 to the current day. The basis for the sector's survival ultimately rests with how it was initially established and the cultural environment in which it developed and continues to operate. In addition to the (albeit irregular) geographically wide distribution of CHCs, their high level of public recognition and sense of community ownership were seen as critical factors that aided their survival and worked against their closure or absorption into hospital networks. Conclusions Based on a synthesis of our findings and personal experiences, we propose five new directions for policy, management and practice that could support this model to have a greater contribution to the health system in Australia.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信