Community health in Victoria: a history of challenges, adaptations and potential.

IF 1.3
Virginia Lewis, Jennifer Macmillan, T McBride, David Legge
{"title":"Community health in Victoria: a history of challenges, adaptations and potential.","authors":"Virginia Lewis, Jennifer Macmillan, T McBride, David Legge","doi":"10.1071/PY24194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The Whitlam Labor government established the Community Health Program (CHP) in Australia in 1973 to improve access to health and related welfare services nationally. States reacted differently to the program. Designated Australian Government funding for the program ended in 1981. In spite of fluctuating state government support and changing legislative frameworks over time, Victoria is the only state that continues to operate a generic community health centre (CHC) program reflecting the original CHP. Methods Data were collected from policy documents and archival material, as well as interviews with 29 key stake holders from Victoria. Transcripts from the interviews were reviewed by the interviewees and permission given to include identifiable quotes. The research is part of a larger Australian Research Council project looking at the history of community health in Australia. Results In Victoria the CHP broke new ground in several respects including creating a public primary health care (PHC) sector, promoting equitable access to PHC, introducing salaried GPs, creating multidisciplinary PHC teams, valuing community involvement (in planning, accountability, health promotion) and taking action on the social determinants of health. Key stakeholders described the challenges that the sector has faced in the decades from 1973 to the current day. The basis for the sector's survival ultimately rests with how it was initially established and the cultural environment in which it developed and continues to operate. In addition to the (albeit irregular) geographically wide distribution of CHCs, their high level of public recognition and sense of community ownership were seen as critical factors that aided their survival and worked against their closure or absorption into hospital networks. Conclusions Based on a synthesis of our findings and personal experiences, we propose five new directions for policy, management and practice that could support this model to have a greater contribution to the health system in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The Whitlam Labor government established the Community Health Program (CHP) in Australia in 1973 to improve access to health and related welfare services nationally. States reacted differently to the program. Designated Australian Government funding for the program ended in 1981. In spite of fluctuating state government support and changing legislative frameworks over time, Victoria is the only state that continues to operate a generic community health centre (CHC) program reflecting the original CHP. Methods Data were collected from policy documents and archival material, as well as interviews with 29 key stake holders from Victoria. Transcripts from the interviews were reviewed by the interviewees and permission given to include identifiable quotes. The research is part of a larger Australian Research Council project looking at the history of community health in Australia. Results In Victoria the CHP broke new ground in several respects including creating a public primary health care (PHC) sector, promoting equitable access to PHC, introducing salaried GPs, creating multidisciplinary PHC teams, valuing community involvement (in planning, accountability, health promotion) and taking action on the social determinants of health. Key stakeholders described the challenges that the sector has faced in the decades from 1973 to the current day. The basis for the sector's survival ultimately rests with how it was initially established and the cultural environment in which it developed and continues to operate. In addition to the (albeit irregular) geographically wide distribution of CHCs, their high level of public recognition and sense of community ownership were seen as critical factors that aided their survival and worked against their closure or absorption into hospital networks. Conclusions Based on a synthesis of our findings and personal experiences, we propose five new directions for policy, management and practice that could support this model to have a greater contribution to the health system in Australia.

维多利亚州的社区卫生:挑战、适应和潜力的历史。
惠特拉姆工党政府于1973年在澳大利亚建立了社区卫生计划(CHP),以改善全国获得卫生和相关福利服务的机会。各州对该计划的反应各不相同。指定的澳大利亚政府资助项目于1981年结束。尽管州政府的支持不稳定,随着时间的推移立法框架也在变化,维多利亚州是唯一一个继续运营反映原始社区卫生中心(CHP)的普通社区卫生中心(CHC)计划的州。方法从政策文件和档案资料中收集数据,并对维多利亚州29名主要利益相关者进行访谈。采访记录由受访者审阅,并允许包括可识别的引用。这项研究是澳大利亚研究委员会一个更大的项目的一部分,该项目着眼于澳大利亚社区健康的历史。结果在维多利亚州,卫生保健中心在几个方面开辟了新的领域,包括建立一个公共初级卫生保健部门,促进公平获得初级卫生保健,引入带薪全科医生,建立多学科初级卫生保健小组,重视社区参与(规划、问责制、健康促进),并就健康的社会决定因素采取行动。主要利益相关者描述了该行业从1973年到现在几十年来所面临的挑战。该行业生存的基础最终取决于它最初是如何建立的,以及它发展和继续运作的文化环境。除了CHCs的地理分布(尽管不规则)外,它们的高水平的公众认知度和社区所有权意识被视为帮助其生存并防止其关闭或被医院网络吸收的关键因素。基于我们的研究结果和个人经验的综合,我们提出了政策、管理和实践的五个新方向,可以支持这种模式对澳大利亚的卫生系统做出更大的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信