YouTube and UTIs: What Is Online Video Content Teaching Our Patients?

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Benjamin Worrall, Anthony-Joe Nassour, Kevin Zhuo, Maria Pilar Alvarado, Amanda Chung
{"title":"YouTube and UTIs: What Is Online Video Content Teaching Our Patients?","authors":"Benjamin Worrall, Anthony-Joe Nassour, Kevin Zhuo, Maria Pilar Alvarado, Amanda Chung","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>YouTube is an important source of information about urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are the most common outpatient infections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the quality of YouTube videos about UTI prevention.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Three doctors independently reviewed the first 50 YouTube search results for \"how to prevent UTIs,\" using the DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT); SPSSv28 was used for analysis with P < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three non-English videos were excluded. Sixteen of 47 (34%) were produced by medical sources. Forty-three of 47 (91%) were targeted at patients, rather than clinicians. The median views per video was 24,110 (88-5,552,204). Nonmedical sources ranked higher in search results (rs = 0.41, P < 0.05). Nonmedical sources had more subscribers and views. Nonmedical sources were \"liked\" significantly more than nonmedical sources (U = 146, P < 0.05). The overall quality of evidence-based material was moderate (mean DISCERN, 3.1). Medical sources were significantly more accurate than nonmedical sources (DISCERN, 3.6 cf. 2.9; P = 0.03). The overall mean PEMAT understandability was 62.8%, and actionability was 65.7%, with no significant difference between medical and nonmedical sources. The video view count was not associated with significantly higher PEMAT or DISCERN scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Videos by medical sources were more factually reliable, but there was no difference in delivery quality between medical and nonmedical sources. Patients may present with inaccurate preconceptions about UTI treatment from YouTube, which practitioners should be prepared to address. There is a role for medical institutions and all doctors who treat patients for UTIs to create YouTube content that is both factually accurate and accessible to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: YouTube is an important source of information about urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are the most common outpatient infections.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the quality of YouTube videos about UTI prevention.

Study design: Three doctors independently reviewed the first 50 YouTube search results for "how to prevent UTIs," using the DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT); SPSSv28 was used for analysis with P < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: Three non-English videos were excluded. Sixteen of 47 (34%) were produced by medical sources. Forty-three of 47 (91%) were targeted at patients, rather than clinicians. The median views per video was 24,110 (88-5,552,204). Nonmedical sources ranked higher in search results (rs = 0.41, P < 0.05). Nonmedical sources had more subscribers and views. Nonmedical sources were "liked" significantly more than nonmedical sources (U = 146, P < 0.05). The overall quality of evidence-based material was moderate (mean DISCERN, 3.1). Medical sources were significantly more accurate than nonmedical sources (DISCERN, 3.6 cf. 2.9; P = 0.03). The overall mean PEMAT understandability was 62.8%, and actionability was 65.7%, with no significant difference between medical and nonmedical sources. The video view count was not associated with significantly higher PEMAT or DISCERN scores.

Conclusions: Videos by medical sources were more factually reliable, but there was no difference in delivery quality between medical and nonmedical sources. Patients may present with inaccurate preconceptions about UTI treatment from YouTube, which practitioners should be prepared to address. There is a role for medical institutions and all doctors who treat patients for UTIs to create YouTube content that is both factually accurate and accessible to patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信