YouTube and UTIs: What Is Online Video Content Teaching Our Patients?

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Benjamin Worrall, Anthony-Joe Nassour, Kevin Zhuo, Maria Pilar Alvarado, Amanda Chung
{"title":"YouTube and UTIs: What Is Online Video Content Teaching Our Patients?","authors":"Benjamin Worrall, Anthony-Joe Nassour, Kevin Zhuo, Maria Pilar Alvarado, Amanda Chung","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>YouTube is an important source of information about urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are the most common outpatient infections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the quality of YouTube videos about UTI prevention.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Three doctors independently reviewed the first 50 YouTube search results for \"how to prevent UTIs,\" using the DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT); SPSSv28 was used for analysis with P < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three non-English videos were excluded. Sixteen of 47 (34%) were produced by medical sources. Forty-three of 47 (91%) were targeted at patients, rather than clinicians. The median views per video was 24,110 (88-5,552,204). Nonmedical sources ranked higher in search results (rs = 0.41, P < 0.05). Nonmedical sources had more subscribers and views. Nonmedical sources were \"liked\" significantly more than nonmedical sources (U = 146, P < 0.05). The overall quality of evidence-based material was moderate (mean DISCERN, 3.1). Medical sources were significantly more accurate than nonmedical sources (DISCERN, 3.6 cf. 2.9; P = 0.03). The overall mean PEMAT understandability was 62.8%, and actionability was 65.7%, with no significant difference between medical and nonmedical sources. The video view count was not associated with significantly higher PEMAT or DISCERN scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Videos by medical sources were more factually reliable, but there was no difference in delivery quality between medical and nonmedical sources. Patients may present with inaccurate preconceptions about UTI treatment from YouTube, which practitioners should be prepared to address. There is a role for medical institutions and all doctors who treat patients for UTIs to create YouTube content that is both factually accurate and accessible to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: YouTube is an important source of information about urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are the most common outpatient infections.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the quality of YouTube videos about UTI prevention.

Study design: Three doctors independently reviewed the first 50 YouTube search results for "how to prevent UTIs," using the DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT); SPSSv28 was used for analysis with P < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: Three non-English videos were excluded. Sixteen of 47 (34%) were produced by medical sources. Forty-three of 47 (91%) were targeted at patients, rather than clinicians. The median views per video was 24,110 (88-5,552,204). Nonmedical sources ranked higher in search results (rs = 0.41, P < 0.05). Nonmedical sources had more subscribers and views. Nonmedical sources were "liked" significantly more than nonmedical sources (U = 146, P < 0.05). The overall quality of evidence-based material was moderate (mean DISCERN, 3.1). Medical sources were significantly more accurate than nonmedical sources (DISCERN, 3.6 cf. 2.9; P = 0.03). The overall mean PEMAT understandability was 62.8%, and actionability was 65.7%, with no significant difference between medical and nonmedical sources. The video view count was not associated with significantly higher PEMAT or DISCERN scores.

Conclusions: Videos by medical sources were more factually reliable, but there was no difference in delivery quality between medical and nonmedical sources. Patients may present with inaccurate preconceptions about UTI treatment from YouTube, which practitioners should be prepared to address. There is a role for medical institutions and all doctors who treat patients for UTIs to create YouTube content that is both factually accurate and accessible to patients.

YouTube和uti:在线视频内容教给我们的病人什么?
重要性:YouTube是关于尿路感染(uti)的重要信息来源,这是最常见的门诊感染。目的:本研究旨在评估YouTube上预防尿路感染视频的质量。研究设计:三位医生使用DISCERN和患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)独立审查了YouTube上“如何预防尿路感染”的前50个搜索结果;采用SPSSv28进行分析,P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:3个非英语视频被排除。47例中有16例(34%)是由医学来源产生的。47例中有43例(91%)针对患者,而不是临床医生。每个视频的平均浏览量为24,110(88-5,552,204)。非医学来源在搜索结果中排名较高(rs = 0.41, P < 0.05)。非医疗来源有更多的订阅者和浏览量。非医学来源的“喜欢度”显著高于非医学来源(U = 146, P < 0.05)。循证材料的总体质量为中等(平均辨析为3.1)。医学来源明显比非医学来源更准确(DISCERN, 3.6 cf. 2.9;P = 0.03)。总体平均PEMAT可理解性为62.8%,可操作性为65.7%,医疗和非医疗来源之间无显著差异。视频观看次数与更高的PEMAT或DISCERN分数无关。结论:医疗来源的视频更可靠,但医疗和非医疗来源的视频质量没有差异。患者可能会对YouTube上的尿路感染治疗有不准确的先入之见,从业者应该准备好解决这个问题。医疗机构和所有治疗尿路感染患者的医生都有责任创建既准确又便于患者访问的YouTube内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信