Development and initial testing of an illness perception questionnaire for substitute decision makers of critically ill patients: a mixed methods study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Louise Mui, Brenda Morgan, Michaël Chassé, Jacob Crawshaw, Claudio M Martin
{"title":"Development and initial testing of an illness perception questionnaire for substitute decision makers of critically ill patients: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Louise Mui, Brenda Morgan, Michaël Chassé, Jacob Crawshaw, Claudio M Martin","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02919-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief-IPQ) is used to quantify a patient's understanding of their condition. In critical care settings, substitute decision makers (SDMs) are tasked with making decisions on behalf of patients, but it can be difficult to evaluate how they perceive the patient's illness. We developed the Illness Perception Questionnaire for Substitute Decision Makers (IPQ-SDM) by adapting the Brief-IPQ and testing it with SDMs of patients in critical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a mixed methods study, we modified the Brief-IPQ for the context of SDMs of critically ill patients using qualitative feedback. We then approached SDMs of critically ill patients three days after intensive care unit (ICU) admission to complete the IPQ-SDM in a prospective observational study. We calculated summary statistics for the individual questions and the total score. We evaluated prespecified associations between individual questions as well as the total score with clinical data that were abstracted from the patient chart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 44/50 (88%) complete responses with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) total score of 43 (11). Forty-six percent reported that they did not have any in-person visits due to the restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The correlation of total score with the nine equivalents of nursing manpower score (NEMS) was 0.42 (P = 0.005) but it was not correlated (P = 0.07) with the multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS). The total mean (SD) score was higher (i.e., worse) for patients who died in hospital (48.2 [9.7], n = 13) than for those who were discharged alive (40.5 [10.2], n = 31, P = 0.03). Concern regarding the illness was correlated with MODS (Spearman correlation coefficient [ρ] = 0.39, P = 0.01) and NEMS (ρ = 0.29, P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed a modest level of correlation of the IPQ-SDM score with clinical measures in the adult ICU setting. Further research is needed before such a tool is broadly implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":"473-480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02919-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief-IPQ) is used to quantify a patient's understanding of their condition. In critical care settings, substitute decision makers (SDMs) are tasked with making decisions on behalf of patients, but it can be difficult to evaluate how they perceive the patient's illness. We developed the Illness Perception Questionnaire for Substitute Decision Makers (IPQ-SDM) by adapting the Brief-IPQ and testing it with SDMs of patients in critical care.

Methods: In a mixed methods study, we modified the Brief-IPQ for the context of SDMs of critically ill patients using qualitative feedback. We then approached SDMs of critically ill patients three days after intensive care unit (ICU) admission to complete the IPQ-SDM in a prospective observational study. We calculated summary statistics for the individual questions and the total score. We evaluated prespecified associations between individual questions as well as the total score with clinical data that were abstracted from the patient chart.

Results: We received 44/50 (88%) complete responses with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) total score of 43 (11). Forty-six percent reported that they did not have any in-person visits due to the restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The correlation of total score with the nine equivalents of nursing manpower score (NEMS) was 0.42 (P = 0.005) but it was not correlated (P = 0.07) with the multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS). The total mean (SD) score was higher (i.e., worse) for patients who died in hospital (48.2 [9.7], n = 13) than for those who were discharged alive (40.5 [10.2], n = 31, P = 0.03). Concern regarding the illness was correlated with MODS (Spearman correlation coefficient [ρ] = 0.39, P = 0.01) and NEMS (ρ = 0.29, P = 0.04).

Conclusion: We observed a modest level of correlation of the IPQ-SDM score with clinical measures in the adult ICU setting. Further research is needed before such a tool is broadly implemented.

危重病人替代决策者疾病感知问卷的开发和初步测试:一项混合方法研究。
目的:简要疾病感知问卷(Brief- ipq)用于量化患者对其病情的了解。在重症监护环境中,替代决策者(SDMs)的任务是代表患者做出决定,但很难评估他们对患者疾病的看法。我们采用简要替代决策者问卷(Brief-IPQ),并与危重病患者的sdm进行测试,开发了替代决策者疾病感知问卷(IPQ-SDM)。方法:在一项混合方法研究中,我们使用定性反馈对Brief-IPQ进行了修改,以适应危重患者SDMs的背景。在一项前瞻性观察研究中,我们对重症监护病房(ICU)入院3天后的危重患者进行sdm分析,以完成IPQ-SDM。我们对单个问题和总分进行了汇总统计。我们评估了个别问题之间预先指定的关联,以及从患者图表中提取的临床数据的总分。结果:我们获得44/50(88%)完整应答,平均(标准差[SD])总分为43(11)分。46%的人报告说,由于COVID-19大流行期间的限制,他们没有进行任何亲自访问。总分与护理人力九等分(NEMS)的相关系数为0.42 (P = 0.005),与多器官功能障碍评分(MODS)无相关(P = 0.07)。住院死亡患者的总平均(SD)评分(48.2 [9.7],n = 13)高于存活出院患者(40.5 [10.2],n = 31, P = 0.03)。对疾病的担忧与MODS (Spearman相关系数[ρ] = 0.39, P = 0.01)和NEMS (ρ = 0.29, P = 0.04)相关。结论:我们观察到IPQ-SDM评分与成人ICU的临床指标有一定的相关性。在这种工具得到广泛应用之前,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信