Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Cross-Clamping Times in Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery by Ministernotomy with Sutureless Prosthesis Implantation Compared to Conventional Prosthesis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.2
Álvaro Perazzo, Silvia Mariani, Gabriela Lucena Montenegro, Luca Conci, Diana Patrícia Lamprea Sepúlveda, Samuel Padovani Steffen, Fabio Antonio Gaiotto, Roberto Lorusso, Silvio Caldas, Esdras Marques Lins, João Carlos Ferreira Leal, Fernando Ribeiro de Moraes
{"title":"Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Cross-Clamping Times in Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery by Ministernotomy with Sutureless Prosthesis Implantation Compared to Conventional Prosthesis: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Álvaro Perazzo, Silvia Mariani, Gabriela Lucena Montenegro, Luca Conci, Diana Patrícia Lamprea Sepúlveda, Samuel Padovani Steffen, Fabio Antonio Gaiotto, Roberto Lorusso, Silvio Caldas, Esdras Marques Lins, João Carlos Ferreira Leal, Fernando Ribeiro de Moraes","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Valve replacement is one of the effective treatments for aortic valve disease. This study aims to compare cardiopulmonary bypass and ischemia times in aortic valve replacement surgeries using stented biological and sutureless prostheses (PERCEVAL®) through a minimally invasive ministernotomy approach. Methods: This single-center cross-sectional study, conducted from February 2015 to February 2021, assessed clinical and epidemiological characteristics in aortic valve replacement patients. It analyzed factors including hospital stay, early outcomes, valve etiology, intraoperative diagnosis, systolic gradients, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular mass. Two groups were studied: 12 patients with PERCEVAL® prostheses and 81 with conventional bioprostheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 93 patients (age: 59 ± 16 years), 61.3% were male, and 80.2% had hypertension; dyslipidemias were present in 34.1% and 25.3% were diabetic. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times were 61 minutes and 41 minutes in the conventional bioprostheses group and 59.5 minutes and 39.5 minutes in the PERCEVAL® group (P=0.143 and P=0.058, respectively). Intensive care unit and overall hospital stays were statistically comparable between both groups (P=0.662 and P=0.599, respectively). All participants survived the 30-day postoperative period, with minimal complications, no significant differences in echocardiographic parameters were observed, yet higher values for certain cardiac function indicators were noted in the conventional bioprostheses group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The groups with conventional bioprostheses and sutureless prostheses (PERCEVAL®) didn't display significant differences in the analyzed variables for ministernotomy aortic valve replacement surgery. They exhibited similar results in terms of hospital stay duration, 30-day outcomes, and cardiac function values.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"40 2","pages":"e20240290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Valve replacement is one of the effective treatments for aortic valve disease. This study aims to compare cardiopulmonary bypass and ischemia times in aortic valve replacement surgeries using stented biological and sutureless prostheses (PERCEVAL®) through a minimally invasive ministernotomy approach. Methods: This single-center cross-sectional study, conducted from February 2015 to February 2021, assessed clinical and epidemiological characteristics in aortic valve replacement patients. It analyzed factors including hospital stay, early outcomes, valve etiology, intraoperative diagnosis, systolic gradients, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular mass. Two groups were studied: 12 patients with PERCEVAL® prostheses and 81 with conventional bioprostheses.

Results: This study included 93 patients (age: 59 ± 16 years), 61.3% were male, and 80.2% had hypertension; dyslipidemias were present in 34.1% and 25.3% were diabetic. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times were 61 minutes and 41 minutes in the conventional bioprostheses group and 59.5 minutes and 39.5 minutes in the PERCEVAL® group (P=0.143 and P=0.058, respectively). Intensive care unit and overall hospital stays were statistically comparable between both groups (P=0.662 and P=0.599, respectively). All participants survived the 30-day postoperative period, with minimal complications, no significant differences in echocardiographic parameters were observed, yet higher values for certain cardiac function indicators were noted in the conventional bioprostheses group.

Conclusion: The groups with conventional bioprostheses and sutureless prostheses (PERCEVAL®) didn't display significant differences in the analyzed variables for ministernotomy aortic valve replacement surgery. They exhibited similar results in terms of hospital stay duration, 30-day outcomes, and cardiac function values.

与传统人工主动脉瓣置换术相比,经胸骨切开植入无缝线假体的主动脉瓣置换术的体外循环和交叉夹持次数:一项横断面研究。
主动脉瓣置换术是治疗主动脉瓣病变的有效方法之一。本研究旨在通过微创胸骨切开术,比较使用生物支架和无缝线假体(PERCEVAL®)进行主动脉瓣置换术的体外循环和缺血时间。方法:这项单中心横断面研究于2015年2月至2021年2月进行,评估主动脉瓣置换术患者的临床和流行病学特征。分析的因素包括住院时间、早期预后、瓣膜病因、术中诊断、收缩梯度、左心室射血分数和左心室质量。研究分为两组:12例使用PERCEVAL®假体,81例使用常规生物假体。结果:本研究纳入93例患者(年龄:59±16岁),男性占61.3%,高血压患者占80.2%;血脂异常占34.1%,糖尿病占25.3%。常规生物假体组体外循环和交叉夹持时间分别为61分钟和41分钟,PERCEVAL®组分别为59.5分钟和39.5分钟(P=0.143和P=0.058)。两组间重症监护病房和总住院时间具有统计学上的可比性(P=0.662和P=0.599)。所有参与者术后30天均存活,并发症最少,超声心动图参数无显著差异,但常规生物假体组某些心功能指标值较高。结论:常规生物假体组与无缝线假体(PERCEVAL®)组在小瓣瓣置换术的分析变量上无显著性差异。他们在住院时间、30天结果和心功能值方面表现出相似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信