Condom use self-efficacy mediates chemsex and condom use: a moderated mediation analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Edmond Pui Hang Choi, Eric Pui Fung Chow
{"title":"Condom use self-efficacy mediates chemsex and condom use: a moderated mediation analysis.","authors":"Edmond Pui Hang Choi, Eric Pui Fung Chow","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2479260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among men who have sex with men (MSM), chemsex is strongly associated with condomless anal sex, contributing to the increased burden of HIV and others sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the community. In regions with limited accessibility to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, condoms remain a critical method for HIV prevention. However, there is a notable lack of research examining the impact of chemsex on condom use self-efficacy. This study aimed to examine condom use self-efficacy among chemsex users and to explore its interrelationship with chemsex and condomless anal sex. Adult MSM in Hong Kong were recruited in 2021. Logistic regression analysis was employed to explore factors associated with condomless anal sex, while mediation analysis was employed to examine the relationships among chemsex, condom use self-efficacy, and condomless anal sex. The analysis included 316 MSM, 51 (16.14%) of whom engaged in chemsex in the last three months, with significantly lower condom use self-efficacy scores. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that chemsex engagement was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of condomless sex. Mediation analysis showed that chemsex engagement indirectly increased the likelihood of condomless anal sex through its negative impact on condom use self-efficacy, with an odds ratio of 3.52 (95% CI: 2.12-7.09). Furthermore, sexual orientation was found to moderate this indirect effect. Among gay men, the indirect effect was more pronounced (odds ratio: 3.74, 95% CI: 2.20-7.71) compared to bisexual men (odds ratio: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.18-4.12). These findings highlight the importance of targeted interventions aimed at enhancing condom use self-efficacy among MSM, particularly among those engaging in chemsex. Strengthening self-efficacy may play a critical role in promoting condom use and reducing the risk of HIV and STIs in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2479260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among men who have sex with men (MSM), chemsex is strongly associated with condomless anal sex, contributing to the increased burden of HIV and others sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the community. In regions with limited accessibility to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, condoms remain a critical method for HIV prevention. However, there is a notable lack of research examining the impact of chemsex on condom use self-efficacy. This study aimed to examine condom use self-efficacy among chemsex users and to explore its interrelationship with chemsex and condomless anal sex. Adult MSM in Hong Kong were recruited in 2021. Logistic regression analysis was employed to explore factors associated with condomless anal sex, while mediation analysis was employed to examine the relationships among chemsex, condom use self-efficacy, and condomless anal sex. The analysis included 316 MSM, 51 (16.14%) of whom engaged in chemsex in the last three months, with significantly lower condom use self-efficacy scores. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that chemsex engagement was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of condomless sex. Mediation analysis showed that chemsex engagement indirectly increased the likelihood of condomless anal sex through its negative impact on condom use self-efficacy, with an odds ratio of 3.52 (95% CI: 2.12-7.09). Furthermore, sexual orientation was found to moderate this indirect effect. Among gay men, the indirect effect was more pronounced (odds ratio: 3.74, 95% CI: 2.20-7.71) compared to bisexual men (odds ratio: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.18-4.12). These findings highlight the importance of targeted interventions aimed at enhancing condom use self-efficacy among MSM, particularly among those engaging in chemsex. Strengthening self-efficacy may play a critical role in promoting condom use and reducing the risk of HIV and STIs in this population.

避孕套使用自我效能介导性行为和避孕套使用:一个有调节的中介分析。
在男男性行为者(MSM)中,化学性行为与无安全套肛交密切相关,从而增加了社区中艾滋病毒和其他性传播感染(sti)的负担。在获得艾滋病毒暴露前预防的机会有限的地区,避孕套仍然是预防艾滋病毒的关键方法。然而,关于化学性交对安全套使用自我效能的影响的研究明显缺乏。本研究旨在探讨化学性使用者使用避孕套的自我效能,并探讨其与化学性和无避孕套肛交的相互关系。香港成年男男性接触者于2021年被招募。采用Logistic回归分析探讨无套肛交的影响因素,采用中介分析探讨化学性行为、安全套使用自我效能感与无套肛交的关系。分析对象包括316名男男性行为者,其中51人(16.14%)在过去三个月内发生过性行为,使用安全套的自我效能得分明显较低。多元逻辑回归分析表明,化学性行为与无安全套性行为的可能性显著相关。中介分析显示,化学性行为通过其对避孕套使用自我效能的负面影响间接增加了无避孕套肛交的可能性,优势比为3.52 (95% CI: 2.12-7.09)。此外,性取向被发现可以缓和这种间接影响。在男同性恋者中,间接影响比双性恋者(优势比:2.01,95% CI: 1.18-4.12)更为明显(优势比:3.74,95% CI: 2.20-7.71)。这些发现强调了有针对性的干预措施的重要性,这些干预措施旨在提高男男性接触者,特别是那些参与化学性行为的人使用安全套的自我效能感。加强自我效能感可能在促进安全套的使用和降低艾滋病毒和性传播感染的风险方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信