Hyeon Joon Lee, Hyun Bai Choi, Ba Woo Ko, Jong Jin Moon, Gwang Chul Lee
{"title":"Comparison of preoperative radiographic measurements for femoral shaft fractures: a study on canal diameter measurement methods.","authors":"Hyeon Joon Lee, Hyun Bai Choi, Ba Woo Ko, Jong Jin Moon, Gwang Chul Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04246-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study sought to determine the most reliable preoperative method for measuring canal diameter in femoral shaft fractures to optimize intramedullary nailing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 164 patients treated with intramedullary nailing at University Hospital from October 2017 to December 2019. Each patient's canal diameter was measured using five techniques: simple anteroposterior (AP) radiography, simple lateral radiography, AP scanogram with a scano rod, lateral scanogram with a scano rod, and computed tomography (CT). Error was calculated as preoperative measurement minus actual nail diameter. Interobserver reliability was assessed with Cohen's Kappa coefficient and paired t tests, with subgroup analyses for isthmus fractures and osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CT yielded the smallest error (-0.34 ± 0.87 mm and 0.25 ± 1.39 mm across observers), with Kappa values of 0.61-0.85 indicating substantial reliability. Only CT showed significant error differences for isthmus fractures (p < 0.05). No method differed significantly with osteoporosis (p > 0.05). Preoperative plans adjusted in 18% of scano rod cases due to discrepancies exceeding 2 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT offers the highest reliability, particularly for isthmus fractures, while scanograms outperform simple radiography, with AP views superior to lateral views. Further investigation is needed into osteoporosis effects on measurement accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04246-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study sought to determine the most reliable preoperative method for measuring canal diameter in femoral shaft fractures to optimize intramedullary nailing outcomes.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 164 patients treated with intramedullary nailing at University Hospital from October 2017 to December 2019. Each patient's canal diameter was measured using five techniques: simple anteroposterior (AP) radiography, simple lateral radiography, AP scanogram with a scano rod, lateral scanogram with a scano rod, and computed tomography (CT). Error was calculated as preoperative measurement minus actual nail diameter. Interobserver reliability was assessed with Cohen's Kappa coefficient and paired t tests, with subgroup analyses for isthmus fractures and osteoporosis.
Results: CT yielded the smallest error (-0.34 ± 0.87 mm and 0.25 ± 1.39 mm across observers), with Kappa values of 0.61-0.85 indicating substantial reliability. Only CT showed significant error differences for isthmus fractures (p < 0.05). No method differed significantly with osteoporosis (p > 0.05). Preoperative plans adjusted in 18% of scano rod cases due to discrepancies exceeding 2 mm.
Conclusion: CT offers the highest reliability, particularly for isthmus fractures, while scanograms outperform simple radiography, with AP views superior to lateral views. Further investigation is needed into osteoporosis effects on measurement accuracy.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.