Adaptation of a Synergy Model-based Patient Acuity Tool for the Electronic Health Record: Proof of Concept.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Mei Lin Chen-Lim, Halley Ruppel, Walter Faig, Eloise Flood, Daniel Mead, Darcy Brodecki
{"title":"Adaptation of a Synergy Model-based Patient Acuity Tool for the Electronic Health Record: Proof of Concept.","authors":"Mei Lin Chen-Lim, Halley Ruppel, Walter Faig, Eloise Flood, Daniel Mead, Darcy Brodecki","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nurse staffing decisions are often made without input from high-quality, reliable patient acuity measures, especially in medical-surgical settings. Staffing decisions not aligned with patient care needs can contribute to inadequate patient-to-nurse ratios and nurse burnout, potentially resulting in preventable patient harm and death. We conducted a proof-of-concept study to explore the feasibility of adapting an evidence-based patient acuity tool for use in the EHR. A retrospective cohort of pediatric medical-surgical inpatients was used to map electronic patient data variables. We developed an algorithm to calculate the score for one domain of the tool and validated it by comparing it with a score based on a manual chart review. Through multiple rounds of testing and refinement of the variables and algorithm, we achieved 100% concordance between scores generated by the algorithm and the manual chart review. Our proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility and challenges of adapting an evidence-based patient acuity score for automation in the EHR. Further collaboration with data scientists is warranted to operationalize the tool in the EHR and achieve an automated acuity score that can improve staffing decisions, support nursing practice, and enhance team collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nurse staffing decisions are often made without input from high-quality, reliable patient acuity measures, especially in medical-surgical settings. Staffing decisions not aligned with patient care needs can contribute to inadequate patient-to-nurse ratios and nurse burnout, potentially resulting in preventable patient harm and death. We conducted a proof-of-concept study to explore the feasibility of adapting an evidence-based patient acuity tool for use in the EHR. A retrospective cohort of pediatric medical-surgical inpatients was used to map electronic patient data variables. We developed an algorithm to calculate the score for one domain of the tool and validated it by comparing it with a score based on a manual chart review. Through multiple rounds of testing and refinement of the variables and algorithm, we achieved 100% concordance between scores generated by the algorithm and the manual chart review. Our proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility and challenges of adapting an evidence-based patient acuity score for automation in the EHR. Further collaboration with data scientists is warranted to operationalize the tool in the EHR and achieve an automated acuity score that can improve staffing decisions, support nursing practice, and enhance team collaboration.

适应基于协同模型的患者敏锐度工具的电子健康记录:概念证明。
护士人员配置的决定往往没有高质量的输入,可靠的病人的视力测量,特别是在医疗外科设置。与患者护理需求不一致的人员配置决策可能导致患者与护士比例不足和护士倦怠,可能导致可预防的患者伤害和死亡。我们进行了一项概念验证研究,以探索在电子病历中采用循证患者敏锐度工具的可行性。一项儿科内科-外科住院患者的回顾性队列研究被用于绘制电子患者数据变量。我们开发了一种算法来计算工具的一个域的分数,并通过将其与基于手动图表审查的分数进行比较来验证它。通过对变量和算法的多轮测试和细化,我们实现了算法生成的分数与人工审核图表100%的一致性。我们的概念验证研究证明了在电子病历自动化中采用循证患者敏锐度评分的可行性和挑战。与数据科学家的进一步合作是必要的,以在EHR中操作该工具,并实现自动化的视力评分,从而改善人员配置决策,支持护理实践,并加强团队协作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信