The Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Nurse-Initiated Protocols in the Emergency Department: A Focus Group Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Julie Gawthorne, Kate Curtis, Andrea McCloughen
{"title":"The Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Nurse-Initiated Protocols in the Emergency Department: A Focus Group Study.","authors":"Julie Gawthorne, Kate Curtis, Andrea McCloughen","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the barriers and enablers to implementing nurse-initiated protocols in an emergency department.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurse-initiated protocols empower emergency nurses to autonomously initiate interventions, investigations and treatments based on predefined clinical guidelines. These protocols reduce waiting times and enhance staff and patient satisfaction. However, their uptake remains inconsistent, and the reasons for this variability are not well understood.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Focus groups were conducted with emergency nurses using an interview guide informed by the theoretical domains framework to explore perceived barriers and enablers to protocol implementation. Audio recordings were transcribed and analysed using inductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six focus groups with 34 participants identified seven categories influencing protocol implementation. Barriers were: (i) nurses' workload and psychological stress, (ii) lack of competence, confidence and experience, and (iii) documentation burden and limited access to resources. Enablers were: (i) education and clinical support, (ii) improved clinical practice, and (iii) positive healthcare outcomes. The nurses and doctor relationship was identified as both a barrier and an enabler.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective implementation of nurse-initiated protocols requires systemic changes that empower nurses within a well-supported, adequately resourced environment. Addressing structural and professional development challenges is crucial to ensuring these protocols are consistently integrated into emergency departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17744","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To identify the barriers and enablers to implementing nurse-initiated protocols in an emergency department.

Background: Nurse-initiated protocols empower emergency nurses to autonomously initiate interventions, investigations and treatments based on predefined clinical guidelines. These protocols reduce waiting times and enhance staff and patient satisfaction. However, their uptake remains inconsistent, and the reasons for this variability are not well understood.

Method: Focus groups were conducted with emergency nurses using an interview guide informed by the theoretical domains framework to explore perceived barriers and enablers to protocol implementation. Audio recordings were transcribed and analysed using inductive content analysis.

Results: Six focus groups with 34 participants identified seven categories influencing protocol implementation. Barriers were: (i) nurses' workload and psychological stress, (ii) lack of competence, confidence and experience, and (iii) documentation burden and limited access to resources. Enablers were: (i) education and clinical support, (ii) improved clinical practice, and (iii) positive healthcare outcomes. The nurses and doctor relationship was identified as both a barrier and an enabler.

Conclusion: Effective implementation of nurse-initiated protocols requires systemic changes that empower nurses within a well-supported, adequately resourced environment. Addressing structural and professional development challenges is crucial to ensuring these protocols are consistently integrated into emergency departments.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信