Hypoxemia in trauma patients receiving two different oxygen strategies: a TRAUMOX2 substudy.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Oscar Rosenkrantz, Tobias Arleth, Andreas Creutzburg, Louise Breum Petersen, Josefine Baekgaard, Stine Zwisler, Søren Mikkelsen, Markus Klimek, Lars Simon Rasmussen, Jacob Steinmetz
{"title":"Hypoxemia in trauma patients receiving two different oxygen strategies: a TRAUMOX2 substudy.","authors":"Oscar Rosenkrantz, Tobias Arleth, Andreas Creutzburg, Louise Breum Petersen, Josefine Baekgaard, Stine Zwisler, Søren Mikkelsen, Markus Klimek, Lars Simon Rasmussen, Jacob Steinmetz","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01360-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The randomized controlled trial, TRAUMOX2, compared early restrictive vs. liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients. The objective of this substudy was to quantify the occurrence and duration of hypoxemic episodes during the trial's eight-hour intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational substudy analyzed a subset of patients at two trial sites in Denmark. Continuous pulse oximetry recorded arterial oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) during the intervention. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had episodes of hypoxemia with SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90% for at least five minutes. Additionally, the study assessed differences in the occurrence and duration of hypoxemia between the restrictive and liberal oxygen groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This substudy included 82 patients. After secondary exclusion, 60 patients (median age, 49 years [interquartile range 33-61] and 75% male) were analyzed. Three out of 60 patients (5%) had at least one episode of SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90% for at least five minutes (95% confidence interval 1-14%); Two patients in the restrictive oxygen group and one in the liberal oxygen group. Two episodes occurred during initial resuscitation, and one episode occurred in the intensive care unit following a procedure related to thoracic injuries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this substudy of 60 patients from the TRAUMOX2 trial, hypoxemia (SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90% for at least five minutes) was observed in 5% of patients, with no difference between the restrictive and liberal oxygen groups. These findings suggest that, among trauma patients not already requiring continuous monitoring, such episodes of hypoxemia are relatively rare early post-trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01360-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The randomized controlled trial, TRAUMOX2, compared early restrictive vs. liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients. The objective of this substudy was to quantify the occurrence and duration of hypoxemic episodes during the trial's eight-hour intervention.

Methods: This observational substudy analyzed a subset of patients at two trial sites in Denmark. Continuous pulse oximetry recorded arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) during the intervention. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had episodes of hypoxemia with SpO2 < 90% for at least five minutes. Additionally, the study assessed differences in the occurrence and duration of hypoxemia between the restrictive and liberal oxygen groups.

Results: This substudy included 82 patients. After secondary exclusion, 60 patients (median age, 49 years [interquartile range 33-61] and 75% male) were analyzed. Three out of 60 patients (5%) had at least one episode of SpO2 < 90% for at least five minutes (95% confidence interval 1-14%); Two patients in the restrictive oxygen group and one in the liberal oxygen group. Two episodes occurred during initial resuscitation, and one episode occurred in the intensive care unit following a procedure related to thoracic injuries.

Conclusions: In this substudy of 60 patients from the TRAUMOX2 trial, hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90% for at least five minutes) was observed in 5% of patients, with no difference between the restrictive and liberal oxygen groups. These findings suggest that, among trauma patients not already requiring continuous monitoring, such episodes of hypoxemia are relatively rare early post-trauma.

创伤患者接受两种不同的供氧策略的低氧血症:一项TRAUMOX2亚研究。
背景:随机对照试验TRAUMOX2比较了创伤患者早期限制性和自由氧策略。本亚研究的目的是量化试验8小时干预期间低氧血症发作的发生率和持续时间。方法:这项观察性亚研究分析了丹麦两个试验点的一组患者。连续脉搏血氧仪记录干预期间动脉血氧饱和度(SpO2)。主要结局是低氧血症伴SpO2发作的患者比例。结果:该亚研究包括82例患者。二次排除后,对60例患者(中位年龄49岁[四分位数范围33-61],75%为男性)进行分析。结论:在这项来自TRAUMOX2试验的60例患者的亚研究中,低氧血症(SpO2)是一种低氧血症
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信