Developing a questionnaire to explore lay people's preferences for communicating hereditary conditions within families: insights from a cognitive interview study.

IF 1.5 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Lea Godino, Linda Battistuzzi, Liliana Varesco, Daniela Turchetti, Vanessa Gentili, Paolo Chiari, Alvisa Palese
{"title":"Developing a questionnaire to explore lay people's preferences for communicating hereditary conditions within families: insights from a cognitive interview study.","authors":"Lea Godino, Linda Battistuzzi, Liliana Varesco, Daniela Turchetti, Vanessa Gentili, Paolo Chiari, Alvisa Palese","doi":"10.1007/s12687-025-00783-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive interviews are a valuable qualitative method for developing and refining survey instruments, particularly on complex topics such as genetic health. They help address misunderstandings between intended meanings and respondent interpretations, enhancing data validity and ensuring comprehensibility. This study aimed to refine a questionnaire exploring the attitudes and preferences of the Italian general population regarding the communication of potential hereditary conditions within families. Through iterative testing, issues related to questionnaire instructions, question wording, and the sensitive nature of the topics were identified and addressed. Most concerns emerged in the first round of cognitive interviews, while the second round only required minor refinements. The qualitative analysis identified four key themes reflecting participants' challenges in understanding genetic information: (1) difficulties with genetic terminology, including gene names and scientific jargon, which induced anxiety and hindered comprehension; (2) ambiguities surrounding the terms \"genetic testing\" and \"family,\" with confusion about the nature of genetic testing and the scope of \"family\" in genetic contexts; (3) misinterpretations of \"genetic risk\" as an existing disease diagnosis rather than a probabilistic concept, leading to misunderstandings about the implications of genetic predisposition; and (4) conflation of \"authorization\" and \"responsibility\" in genetic communication, further complicated by uncertainty regarding privacy and confidentiality. Findings from this study informed targeted modifications to the questionnaire to enhance its clarity and accessibility. Our study highlights the importance of cognitive interviewing in refining survey tools on genetic communication, ensuring that such instruments effectively capture public perceptions and facilitate informed decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-025-00783-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive interviews are a valuable qualitative method for developing and refining survey instruments, particularly on complex topics such as genetic health. They help address misunderstandings between intended meanings and respondent interpretations, enhancing data validity and ensuring comprehensibility. This study aimed to refine a questionnaire exploring the attitudes and preferences of the Italian general population regarding the communication of potential hereditary conditions within families. Through iterative testing, issues related to questionnaire instructions, question wording, and the sensitive nature of the topics were identified and addressed. Most concerns emerged in the first round of cognitive interviews, while the second round only required minor refinements. The qualitative analysis identified four key themes reflecting participants' challenges in understanding genetic information: (1) difficulties with genetic terminology, including gene names and scientific jargon, which induced anxiety and hindered comprehension; (2) ambiguities surrounding the terms "genetic testing" and "family," with confusion about the nature of genetic testing and the scope of "family" in genetic contexts; (3) misinterpretations of "genetic risk" as an existing disease diagnosis rather than a probabilistic concept, leading to misunderstandings about the implications of genetic predisposition; and (4) conflation of "authorization" and "responsibility" in genetic communication, further complicated by uncertainty regarding privacy and confidentiality. Findings from this study informed targeted modifications to the questionnaire to enhance its clarity and accessibility. Our study highlights the importance of cognitive interviewing in refining survey tools on genetic communication, ensuring that such instruments effectively capture public perceptions and facilitate informed decision-making.

开发一份调查问卷,以探索外行人在家庭内沟通遗传条件的偏好:来自认知访谈研究的见解。
认知访谈是开发和完善调查工具的一种有价值的定性方法,特别是在遗传健康等复杂主题上。它们有助于解决预期意义和应答者解释之间的误解,增强数据有效性并确保可理解性。本研究旨在完善一份调查问卷,探讨意大利普通民众对家庭内潜在遗传条件交流的态度和偏好。通过迭代测试,与问卷说明、问题措辞和主题的敏感性相关的问题被识别和处理。大多数问题出现在第一轮认知面试中,而第二轮只需要稍微改进一下。定性分析确定了四个关键主题,反映了参与者在理解遗传信息方面的挑战:(1)在遗传术语方面的困难,包括基因名称和科学术语,导致焦虑和阻碍理解;(2)围绕“基因检测”和“家庭”这两个术语的歧义,对基因检测的性质和基因语境中“家庭”的范围存在混淆;(3)将“遗传风险”误解为一种现有的疾病诊断,而不是概率概念,导致对遗传易感性含义的误解;(4)基因传播中“授权”和“责任”的混淆,隐私和保密的不确定性进一步复杂化。本研究的结果告知有针对性地修改问卷,以提高其清晰度和可及性。我们的研究强调了认知访谈在改进遗传传播调查工具方面的重要性,确保这些工具有效地捕捉公众的看法并促进知情决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信