A V Gavrilenko, A V Abramyan, G F Magomedova, Zh Li, Z A Eremeeva, D A Semchenkova, P D Burkhanova, D D Donskaya
{"title":"[Surgical significance of quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity].","authors":"A V Gavrilenko, A V Abramyan, G F Magomedova, Zh Li, Z A Eremeeva, D A Semchenkova, P D Burkhanova, D D Donskaya","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202503163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare sensitivity and specificity of various methods for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 41 patients with carotid artery tortuosity confirmed by CT angiography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 3 mathematical models for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity: model 1 - 80.0% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity; model 2 - 90.5% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity; model 3 - 86.7% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All three mathematical models are valid for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity. The third method is the most convenient and quickest, as it requires only two parameters for calculation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 3","pages":"63-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202503163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare sensitivity and specificity of various methods for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity.
Material and methods: The study included 41 patients with carotid artery tortuosity confirmed by CT angiography.
Results: All 3 mathematical models for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity: model 1 - 80.0% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity; model 2 - 90.5% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity; model 3 - 86.7% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity.
Conclusion: All three mathematical models are valid for quantitative assessment of carotid artery tortuosity. The third method is the most convenient and quickest, as it requires only two parameters for calculation.