[Effectiveness of ischemic limb revascularization through superficial or deep femoral artery in patients with critical ischemia undergoing hybrid interventions].

Q4 Medicine
B S Sukovatykh, P M Nazarenko, N V Bolomatov, M B Sukovatykh, M Yu Gordov, A Yu Grigoryan, A V Alekseev
{"title":"[Effectiveness of ischemic limb revascularization through superficial or deep femoral artery in patients with critical ischemia undergoing hybrid interventions].","authors":"B S Sukovatykh, P M Nazarenko, N V Bolomatov, M B Sukovatykh, M Yu Gordov, A Yu Grigoryan, A V Alekseev","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202503148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the results of ischemic limb revascularization through superficial and deep femoral arteries in hybrid treatment of critical limb ischemia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 60 patients with lesions of infrainguinal arteries TASC grade IIC and IID who underwent hybrid treatment (balloon angioplasty with iliac stenting and open femoral artery reconstruction). Two equal groups of patients were identified depending on postoperative blood flow: group 1 - blood flow through superficial femoral artery, group 2 - blood flow through deep femoral artery. Treatment outcomes were assessed regarding postoperative morbidity and clinical status after 6 and 12 months (Rutherford scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative complications occurred in 6 (10%) patients equally in both groups. In one case (pulsatile hematoma), they were associated with endovascular procedure, in 5 cases (bleeding, lymphorrhea and wound infection) - with surgical intervention. After 6 months, circulation improved in both groups (more significant in the first group). After 12 months, 16.7% of patients in group 1 experienced negative dynamics due to repeated occlusion of superficial femoral artery. Deep femoral artery remained patent in group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recovery of circulation through deep femoral artery is more effective than superficial femoral artery.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 3","pages":"48-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202503148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the results of ischemic limb revascularization through superficial and deep femoral arteries in hybrid treatment of critical limb ischemia.

Material and methods: Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 60 patients with lesions of infrainguinal arteries TASC grade IIC and IID who underwent hybrid treatment (balloon angioplasty with iliac stenting and open femoral artery reconstruction). Two equal groups of patients were identified depending on postoperative blood flow: group 1 - blood flow through superficial femoral artery, group 2 - blood flow through deep femoral artery. Treatment outcomes were assessed regarding postoperative morbidity and clinical status after 6 and 12 months (Rutherford scale).

Results: Postoperative complications occurred in 6 (10%) patients equally in both groups. In one case (pulsatile hematoma), they were associated with endovascular procedure, in 5 cases (bleeding, lymphorrhea and wound infection) - with surgical intervention. After 6 months, circulation improved in both groups (more significant in the first group). After 12 months, 16.7% of patients in group 1 experienced negative dynamics due to repeated occlusion of superficial femoral artery. Deep femoral artery remained patent in group 2.

Conclusion: Recovery of circulation through deep femoral artery is more effective than superficial femoral artery.

[接受混合介入治疗的重度缺血患者通过股浅动脉或股深动脉进行缺血肢体血管重建的效果]。
目的:比较经股浅动脉与股深动脉联合治疗肢体缺血的效果。材料和方法:对60例TASC级IIC级和IID级腹股沟下动脉病变患者进行混合治疗(髂支架球囊成形术和开放股动脉重建术)的治疗结果进行分析。根据术后血流量分为两组:1组为股浅动脉血流量,2组为股深动脉血流量。根据术后6个月和12个月的发病率和临床状态(卢瑟福量表)评估治疗结果。结果:两组患者术后并发症发生率均为6例(10%)。1例(搏动性血肿)与血管内手术有关,5例(出血、淋巴漏和伤口感染)与手术干预有关。6个月后,两组患者的血液循环均有改善(第一组更明显)。12个月后,第1组16.7%的患者由于股浅动脉反复闭塞而出现负动态。2组股深动脉通畅。结论:经股深动脉恢复循环比经股浅动脉恢复循环更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Khirurgiya
Khirurgiya Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Хирургия отдельных областей сердце, сосуды легкие пищевод молочная железа желудок и двенадцатиперстная кишка кишечник желчевыводящие пути печень
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信