Expanded Hemodialysis With Theranova® Compared to Conventional High-flux Hemodialysis: A Prospective Randomized 12-month Study.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000769
Maggie Ming Yee Mok, Susan Yung, Lorraine Pui Yuen Kwan, Terence Pok Siu Yip, Sing Leung Lui, Tak Mao Chan
{"title":"Expanded Hemodialysis With Theranova® Compared to Conventional High-flux Hemodialysis: A Prospective Randomized 12-month Study.","authors":"Maggie Ming Yee Mok, Susan Yung, Lorraine Pui Yuen Kwan, Terence Pok Siu Yip, Sing Leung Lui, Tak Mao Chan","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expanded hemodialysis using medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzer enables higher clearance of larger middle molecules. A twice-weekly hemodialysis (HD) regimen is commonly adopted in Hong Kong. This study compared the effect of MCO-HD versus high-flux HD for 12 months on clinical and patient reported outcomes and biomarkers related to nutritional status, inflammation and cardiovascular health with high-flux HD, with over 60% of patients on twice weekly HD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stable HD patients, after 6 weeks of high-flux HD run-in, were randomized (1:1) to continue high-flux HD (Control group) or change to MCO-HD with Theranova® dialyzer and observed for 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients were randomized (30:30), with 60% on twice-weekly HD. Body mass index, lean and fat tissue indexes remained stable throughout, with no within- or between-group difference. Serum albumin showed a transient decrease in the MCO-HD group, with 6-month value significantly lower than baseline (3.62±0.34 vs. 3.79±0.28g/dL, p=0.043) and that in Controls (3.84±0.34g/dL, p=0.024), before it increased back to baseline level. At 12-month, the two groups showed similar laboratory parameters and patient-reported outcomes related to sleep quality, appetite, itchiness, and quality of life. There was no consistent change in biomarkers related to inflammation and cardiovascular health. The incidence rate of adverse events, cardiovascular events, infection rate and hospitalization rates were similar in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCO-HD was safe and well-tolerated and, except for an initial decrease of serum albumin at 6 months which subsequently returned to baseline. It was not associated with significant differences in clinical and nutritional parameters, patient-reported outcomes, inflammatory/cardiovascular biomarkers and adverse clinical event rates in patients on twice weekly HD.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Expanded hemodialysis using medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzer enables higher clearance of larger middle molecules. A twice-weekly hemodialysis (HD) regimen is commonly adopted in Hong Kong. This study compared the effect of MCO-HD versus high-flux HD for 12 months on clinical and patient reported outcomes and biomarkers related to nutritional status, inflammation and cardiovascular health with high-flux HD, with over 60% of patients on twice weekly HD.

Methods: Stable HD patients, after 6 weeks of high-flux HD run-in, were randomized (1:1) to continue high-flux HD (Control group) or change to MCO-HD with Theranova® dialyzer and observed for 12 months.

Results: Sixty patients were randomized (30:30), with 60% on twice-weekly HD. Body mass index, lean and fat tissue indexes remained stable throughout, with no within- or between-group difference. Serum albumin showed a transient decrease in the MCO-HD group, with 6-month value significantly lower than baseline (3.62±0.34 vs. 3.79±0.28g/dL, p=0.043) and that in Controls (3.84±0.34g/dL, p=0.024), before it increased back to baseline level. At 12-month, the two groups showed similar laboratory parameters and patient-reported outcomes related to sleep quality, appetite, itchiness, and quality of life. There was no consistent change in biomarkers related to inflammation and cardiovascular health. The incidence rate of adverse events, cardiovascular events, infection rate and hospitalization rates were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions: MCO-HD was safe and well-tolerated and, except for an initial decrease of serum albumin at 6 months which subsequently returned to baseline. It was not associated with significant differences in clinical and nutritional parameters, patient-reported outcomes, inflammatory/cardiovascular biomarkers and adverse clinical event rates in patients on twice weekly HD.

Theranova® 扩大血液透析与传统高通量血液透析的比较:一项为期 12 个月的前瞻性随机研究。
背景:使用介质截止(MCO)透析器进行扩展血液透析可以提高对较大中间分子的清除率。在香港,每周两次的血液透析(HD)方案是普遍采用的。该研究比较了MCO-HD与高通量HD在12个月的临床和患者报告的结果以及与高通量HD患者营养状况、炎症和心血管健康相关的生物标志物的影响,超过60%的患者每周接受两次HD治疗。方法:稳定型HD患者在高通量HD磨合6周后,按1:1的比例随机分为继续高通量HD(对照组)或改用MCO-HD (Theranova®透析器),观察12个月。结果:60例患者随机分组(30:30),60%患者每周进行两次HD治疗。体重指数、瘦肉组织指数和脂肪组织指数在整个过程中保持稳定,没有组内或组间差异。MCO-HD组血清白蛋白出现短暂性下降,6个月值显著低于基线(3.62±0.34 vs. 3.79±0.28g/dL, p=0.043)和对照组(3.84±0.34g/dL, p=0.024),然后回升至基线水平。在12个月时,两组显示出相似的实验室参数和患者报告的与睡眠质量、食欲、瘙痒和生活质量相关的结果。与炎症和心血管健康相关的生物标志物没有一致的变化。两组患者不良事件发生率、心血管事件发生率、感染率、住院率相似。结论:MCO-HD是安全且耐受性良好的,除了6个月时血清白蛋白最初下降,随后恢复到基线水平。在每周服用两次HD的患者中,它与临床和营养参数、患者报告的结局、炎症/心血管生物标志物和不良临床事件发生率的显著差异无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信