Modelling of a double-scattering proton therapy nozzle using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code and analysis of linear energy transfer in patients treated for prostate cancer.
IF 2 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Rasmus Klitgaard, Lars Fredrik Fjæra, Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg, Perry Johnson, Mark Artz, Nancy Price Mendenhall, Curtis Bryant, Ludvig Paul Muren
{"title":"Modelling of a double-scattering proton therapy nozzle using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code and analysis of linear energy transfer in patients treated for prostate cancer.","authors":"Rasmus Klitgaard, Lars Fredrik Fjæra, Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg, Perry Johnson, Mark Artz, Nancy Price Mendenhall, Curtis Bryant, Ludvig Paul Muren","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET<sub>D</sub>) in proton therapy (PT) has in pre-clinical studies been linked to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons. Until recently, the most common PT delivery method in prostate cancer has been double-scattered PT, with LET<sub>D</sub> only available through dedicated Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. However, as most studies of the relationship between LET<sub>D</sub> and RBE in double scattered PT have been focused on the head and neck region, existing MC implementations have not been capable of calculating LET<sub>D</sub> for the longer field ranges used, for example, in the pelvic region.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The initial aim of this study was to implement a MC code allowing for LET<sub>D</sub> calculations in double-scattered PT of prostate cancer. Additionally, we explored LET<sub>D</sub> profiles and LET<sub>D</sub> as a function of field configuration, by performing MC calculations for a large prostate cancer cohort treated with double-scattered PT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The components of a passive scattered clinical treatment nozzle used for delivery of extended field ranges, with two associated modulation wheels, were implemented into an existing FLUKA MC framework for LET<sub>D</sub> calculations. The code was validated to spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) measurements conducted using the treatment nozzle with 11 different range and modulation width configurations. After validation, LET<sub>D</sub> distributions were calculated on the planning computed tomographies of 582 prostate cancer patients treated with two-field double-scattered PT. All patients had symmetric field configurations with respect to the sagittal plane, with one pair of posterior oblique, lateral opposing, or anterior oblique fields. Dose and LET<sub>D</sub> volume parameters and the mean LET<sub>D</sub> ratio between the bladder and rectum were compared across the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The range differences were below 1 mm for all SOBP scenarios used for calibration. For 9 of 11 SOBP scenarios, the modulation width differences were below 2 mm. For the patient simulations, the mean gamma pass rates (3 mm/3%) were at least 98% in the PTV, bladder, and rectum. Comparing anterior to posterior field configurations, the mean LET<sub>D</sub> in the bladder increased within both the 10 and 70 Gy iso-dose regions, and conversely, the mean LET<sub>D</sub> decreased for the rectum. There was a marked difference in the mean bladder-to-rectum LET<sub>D</sub> ratios between anterior oblique, lateral opposing and posterior oblique field configurations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A MC code allowing for accurate calculations of dose and LET<sub>D</sub> in double-scattered PT of prostate cancer was implemented and validated. The LET<sub>D</sub> distributions in the rectum and bladder showed a systematic dependence on the field configuration.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETD) in proton therapy (PT) has in pre-clinical studies been linked to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons. Until recently, the most common PT delivery method in prostate cancer has been double-scattered PT, with LETD only available through dedicated Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. However, as most studies of the relationship between LETD and RBE in double scattered PT have been focused on the head and neck region, existing MC implementations have not been capable of calculating LETD for the longer field ranges used, for example, in the pelvic region.
Purpose: The initial aim of this study was to implement a MC code allowing for LETD calculations in double-scattered PT of prostate cancer. Additionally, we explored LETD profiles and LETD as a function of field configuration, by performing MC calculations for a large prostate cancer cohort treated with double-scattered PT.
Methods: The components of a passive scattered clinical treatment nozzle used for delivery of extended field ranges, with two associated modulation wheels, were implemented into an existing FLUKA MC framework for LETD calculations. The code was validated to spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) measurements conducted using the treatment nozzle with 11 different range and modulation width configurations. After validation, LETD distributions were calculated on the planning computed tomographies of 582 prostate cancer patients treated with two-field double-scattered PT. All patients had symmetric field configurations with respect to the sagittal plane, with one pair of posterior oblique, lateral opposing, or anterior oblique fields. Dose and LETD volume parameters and the mean LETD ratio between the bladder and rectum were compared across the three groups.
Results: The range differences were below 1 mm for all SOBP scenarios used for calibration. For 9 of 11 SOBP scenarios, the modulation width differences were below 2 mm. For the patient simulations, the mean gamma pass rates (3 mm/3%) were at least 98% in the PTV, bladder, and rectum. Comparing anterior to posterior field configurations, the mean LETD in the bladder increased within both the 10 and 70 Gy iso-dose regions, and conversely, the mean LETD decreased for the rectum. There was a marked difference in the mean bladder-to-rectum LETD ratios between anterior oblique, lateral opposing and posterior oblique field configurations.
Conclusion: A MC code allowing for accurate calculations of dose and LETD in double-scattered PT of prostate cancer was implemented and validated. The LETD distributions in the rectum and bladder showed a systematic dependence on the field configuration.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
