Australian general practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and prescribing intentions for e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid: a nationwide baseline and 12-month follow up survey.

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Melis Selamoglu, Sowmya Malamardi, Bircan Erbas, Hester Wilson, Jamie Brown, Chris Barton
{"title":"Australian general practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and prescribing intentions for e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid: a nationwide baseline and 12-month follow up survey.","authors":"Melis Selamoglu, Sowmya Malamardi, Bircan Erbas, Hester Wilson, Jamie Brown, Chris Barton","doi":"10.1186/s12954-025-01175-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Australian Government introduced a major policy change tightening regulations regarding the access to nicotine containing e-cigarettes in October 2021. We assessed general practitioners' (GPs) knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and intentions to prescribe nicotine containing e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. We compared baseline data near the time of policy change with data collected from these GPs 12-months later.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GPs were invited to complete a repeated cross-sectional survey based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour between December 2021 and March 2022 (T1) and again, between January and April 2023 (T2). Survey questions assessed knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and intention to prescribe e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 264 GPs completed the baseline (T1) survey and 94 provided responses at follow-up (T2). Over half of responders were female (T1 n = 170, 64.4%, T2 n = 57, 60.6%) and roughly one third were aged between 30 and 39 years (T1 n = 80, 37.2%, T2 n = 28, 29.8%). Participants who agreed e-cigarettes were suitable smoking cessation aids were more willing to recommend e-cigarettes to patients at T1 and T2 (T1 n = 29, 87.9%, vs. T2 n = 20, 100%). Knowledge about e-cigarettes was limited and did not change between T1 and T2. Participants who had greater confidence in their ability to talk to and answer patient questions about e-cigarettes were more likely to recommend them for smoking cessation at both T1 and T2 (T1 n = 24, 70.6% vs. T2 n = 17, 85.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since tightening the regulation of nicotine containing e-cigarettes, there has been little change in Australian GPs' perceptions of e-cigarettes as smoking cessation aids. Australian GPs are poorly educated about vaping and knowledge about e-cigarettes remained limited, however, GPs at follow-up were more confident in their ability to discuss e-cigarettes with their patients. The findings from this survey may help guide policy and develop strategies to support the implementation of smoking cessation guidelines that incorporate the use of e-cigarettes as smoking cessation aids in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01175-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Australian Government introduced a major policy change tightening regulations regarding the access to nicotine containing e-cigarettes in October 2021. We assessed general practitioners' (GPs) knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and intentions to prescribe nicotine containing e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. We compared baseline data near the time of policy change with data collected from these GPs 12-months later.

Methods: GPs were invited to complete a repeated cross-sectional survey based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour between December 2021 and March 2022 (T1) and again, between January and April 2023 (T2). Survey questions assessed knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and intention to prescribe e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.

Results: A total of 264 GPs completed the baseline (T1) survey and 94 provided responses at follow-up (T2). Over half of responders were female (T1 n = 170, 64.4%, T2 n = 57, 60.6%) and roughly one third were aged between 30 and 39 years (T1 n = 80, 37.2%, T2 n = 28, 29.8%). Participants who agreed e-cigarettes were suitable smoking cessation aids were more willing to recommend e-cigarettes to patients at T1 and T2 (T1 n = 29, 87.9%, vs. T2 n = 20, 100%). Knowledge about e-cigarettes was limited and did not change between T1 and T2. Participants who had greater confidence in their ability to talk to and answer patient questions about e-cigarettes were more likely to recommend them for smoking cessation at both T1 and T2 (T1 n = 24, 70.6% vs. T2 n = 17, 85.0%).

Conclusion: Since tightening the regulation of nicotine containing e-cigarettes, there has been little change in Australian GPs' perceptions of e-cigarettes as smoking cessation aids. Australian GPs are poorly educated about vaping and knowledge about e-cigarettes remained limited, however, GPs at follow-up were more confident in their ability to discuss e-cigarettes with their patients. The findings from this survey may help guide policy and develop strategies to support the implementation of smoking cessation guidelines that incorporate the use of e-cigarettes as smoking cessation aids in Australia.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信