Factors Associated With the Availability of Virtual Consultations in Primary Care Across 20 Countries: Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gabriele Kerr, Geva Greenfield, Edmond Li, Thomas Beaney, Benedict W J Hayhoe, Josip Car, Ana Clavería, Claire Collins, Gustavo Gusso, Robert D Hoffman, Geronimo Jimenez, Tuomas H Koskela, Liliana Laranjo, Heidrun Lingner, Ensieh Memarian, Katarzyna Nessler, Davorina Petek, Rosy Tsopra, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luisa Neves
{"title":"Factors Associated With the Availability of Virtual Consultations in Primary Care Across 20 Countries: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Gabriele Kerr, Geva Greenfield, Edmond Li, Thomas Beaney, Benedict W J Hayhoe, Josip Car, Ana Clavería, Claire Collins, Gustavo Gusso, Robert D Hoffman, Geronimo Jimenez, Tuomas H Koskela, Liliana Laranjo, Heidrun Lingner, Ensieh Memarian, Katarzyna Nessler, Davorina Petek, Rosy Tsopra, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luisa Neves","doi":"10.2196/65147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual consultations represent a notable change in health care delivery following the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the dynamics of virtual consultations is critical in assessing health care system resilience and adaptability in times of crisis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to describe the availability and hours of use of telephone, video, and human chat consultations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic period, and identify factors associated with their availability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary care physicians (PCPs) from 20 upper-middle- and high-income countries completed a cross-sectional web-based survey in 2020. Factors associated with availability were investigated using chi-square tests and effect size (ES) estimates calculated using Cramer V.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1370 PCPs were included in this study (85.4% of the total sample of 1605). Telephone consultations were the most frequently available type of virtual consultations before and during the pandemic (73.1% and 90.4%, respectively). Significant increases in availability and use were observed during the pandemic for all the types of virtual consultations. The largest absolute increase in availability was observed for video consultations (39.5%), followed by telephone (17.3%) and chat (8.6%; all P<.001). The largest increase in use was observed for telephone consultations (+11 hours per week, P<.001). Digital maturity of the practice was weakly associated with availability of video consultations both before (ES 0.2) and during (ES 0.2) the pandemic (P<.001 for both), and with chat consultations before the pandemic only (ES 0.1, P=.001). Greater availability of video and chat consultations was found in PCPs who had completed digital health training, both before and during the pandemic (P<.001 for all). There was significant country-level variation in the use and availabilities of the technologies between both time periods. The association between country and the availability of telephone consultations changed from strong (ES 0.5, P<.001) to weak (ES 0.2, P=.03), while the relationship between country and video consultations changed from moderate (ES 0.3, P<.001) to strong (ES 0.5, P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates the transformative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the availability of virtual consultations globally, and how practice-level factors, predominantly digital maturity, digital health training, and country, were associated with the availability of virtual consultations. Further exploration of drivers of availability, particularly at the national level, is needed to ensure sustained and effective implementation of virtual consultations.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.2196/30099.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e65147"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Virtual consultations represent a notable change in health care delivery following the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the dynamics of virtual consultations is critical in assessing health care system resilience and adaptability in times of crisis.

Objective: This study aimed to describe the availability and hours of use of telephone, video, and human chat consultations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic period, and identify factors associated with their availability.

Methods: Primary care physicians (PCPs) from 20 upper-middle- and high-income countries completed a cross-sectional web-based survey in 2020. Factors associated with availability were investigated using chi-square tests and effect size (ES) estimates calculated using Cramer V.

Results: A total of 1370 PCPs were included in this study (85.4% of the total sample of 1605). Telephone consultations were the most frequently available type of virtual consultations before and during the pandemic (73.1% and 90.4%, respectively). Significant increases in availability and use were observed during the pandemic for all the types of virtual consultations. The largest absolute increase in availability was observed for video consultations (39.5%), followed by telephone (17.3%) and chat (8.6%; all P<.001). The largest increase in use was observed for telephone consultations (+11 hours per week, P<.001). Digital maturity of the practice was weakly associated with availability of video consultations both before (ES 0.2) and during (ES 0.2) the pandemic (P<.001 for both), and with chat consultations before the pandemic only (ES 0.1, P=.001). Greater availability of video and chat consultations was found in PCPs who had completed digital health training, both before and during the pandemic (P<.001 for all). There was significant country-level variation in the use and availabilities of the technologies between both time periods. The association between country and the availability of telephone consultations changed from strong (ES 0.5, P<.001) to weak (ES 0.2, P=.03), while the relationship between country and video consultations changed from moderate (ES 0.3, P<.001) to strong (ES 0.5, P<.001).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the transformative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the availability of virtual consultations globally, and how practice-level factors, predominantly digital maturity, digital health training, and country, were associated with the availability of virtual consultations. Further exploration of drivers of availability, particularly at the national level, is needed to ensure sustained and effective implementation of virtual consultations.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/30099.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信