Interpersonal Sensitivity and Social Problem-Solving in Adolescents with Suicide Attempts or Non-suicidal Self-Injury.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Julianne G Wilner, Emma Cho, Alessandro S De Nadai, Josephine S Au, Jillian M Russo, Courtney Kaplan, Maria Naclerio, Eileen Lee, Angela Salisbury, Daniel P Dickstein
{"title":"Interpersonal Sensitivity and Social Problem-Solving in Adolescents with Suicide Attempts or Non-suicidal Self-Injury.","authors":"Julianne G Wilner, Emma Cho, Alessandro S De Nadai, Josephine S Au, Jillian M Russo, Courtney Kaplan, Maria Naclerio, Eileen Lee, Angela Salisbury, Daniel P Dickstein","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2025.2476987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Interpersonal dysfunction robustly predicts suicide attempts (SA) and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in adolescents. We sought to better elucidate how two interpersonal constructions (interpersonal sensitivity and social problem-solving strategies) may lead to NSSI <i>vs.</i> SA in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We compared non-overlapping groups of adolescents engaged in either SA (<i>n</i> = 49, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 15.80, <i>SD</i> = 1.23, 63% female) or NSSI (<i>n</i> = 50, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 15.35, <i>SD</i> = 1.34, 82% female), and healthy controls (HC; <i>n</i> = 43, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 15.46, <i>SD</i> = 1.30, 61% female). We hypothesized: (1) greater interpersonal sensitivity and deficits in social problem-solving strategies would differentiate the three groups and indicate higher risk for being in the NSSI and SA groups, relative to the HC groups, and (2) amongst clinical groups, there would be greater deficits in social problem-solving in the SA group, and greater interpersonal sensitivity in the NSSI group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NSSI and SA groups demonstrated more interpersonal sensitivity and lower (i.e., worse) social problem-solving skills <i>vs.</i> HCs. Participants were more likely to be in both the SA and NSSI groups based on interpersonal sensitivity (OR<sub>SA</sub> = 2.61; OR<sub>NSSI</sub> = 2.75) and social problem-solving (OR<sub>SA</sub> = 19.11; OR<sub>NSSI</sub> = 10.89). Significant differences were observed between the NSSI and SA groups on interpersonal sensitivity [<i>t</i>(97) = 4.28, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 0.86; higher levels in the NSSI group], but not on social problem-solving [<i>t</i>(97) = 1.97, <i>p</i> = .052, <i>d</i> = 0.40].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both greater interpersonal sensitivity and challenges in social problem-solving predict NSSI and suicidal behavior in adolescents, and interpersonal sensitivity may be a particularly salient risk factor for NSSI. Implications for treatment and future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2025.2476987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Interpersonal dysfunction robustly predicts suicide attempts (SA) and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in adolescents. We sought to better elucidate how two interpersonal constructions (interpersonal sensitivity and social problem-solving strategies) may lead to NSSI vs. SA in adolescents.

Method: We compared non-overlapping groups of adolescents engaged in either SA (n = 49, Mage = 15.80, SD = 1.23, 63% female) or NSSI (n = 50, Mage = 15.35, SD = 1.34, 82% female), and healthy controls (HC; n = 43, Mage = 15.46, SD = 1.30, 61% female). We hypothesized: (1) greater interpersonal sensitivity and deficits in social problem-solving strategies would differentiate the three groups and indicate higher risk for being in the NSSI and SA groups, relative to the HC groups, and (2) amongst clinical groups, there would be greater deficits in social problem-solving in the SA group, and greater interpersonal sensitivity in the NSSI group.

Results: NSSI and SA groups demonstrated more interpersonal sensitivity and lower (i.e., worse) social problem-solving skills vs. HCs. Participants were more likely to be in both the SA and NSSI groups based on interpersonal sensitivity (ORSA = 2.61; ORNSSI = 2.75) and social problem-solving (ORSA = 19.11; ORNSSI = 10.89). Significant differences were observed between the NSSI and SA groups on interpersonal sensitivity [t(97) = 4.28, p < .001, d = 0.86; higher levels in the NSSI group], but not on social problem-solving [t(97) = 1.97, p = .052, d = 0.40].

Conclusions: Both greater interpersonal sensitivity and challenges in social problem-solving predict NSSI and suicidal behavior in adolescents, and interpersonal sensitivity may be a particularly salient risk factor for NSSI. Implications for treatment and future research are discussed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信