Clinical outcomes according to the average daily dose of sacubitril/valsartan: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jaehyun Lim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Soongu Kwak, Bongseong Kim, Kyung-Do Han, Heesun Lee, Jun-Bean Park, Yong-Jin Kim, Hyung-Kwan Kim
{"title":"Clinical outcomes according to the average daily dose of sacubitril/valsartan: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Jaehyun Lim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Soongu Kwak, Bongseong Kim, Kyung-Do Han, Heesun Lee, Jun-Bean Park, Yong-Jin Kim, Hyung-Kwan Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00392-025-02602-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A minority of patients with heart failure (HF) are prescribed the maximal dose of the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan. We investigated the effectiveness of submaximal doses of sacubitril/valsartan in a real-world cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction prescribed sacubitril/valsartan for ≥ 180 days between 2016 and 2020 were included from a nationwide database, and categorized into tertiles based on the average daily sacubitril/valsartan dosage. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores. The primary outcome was a composite of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The study included 3,953 patients (age 62.6 ± 12.4 years, 73.0% men). Patients on lower sacubitril/valsartan doses were older, more likely to be women, and had more comorbidities, with lower blood pressure, reduced kidney function, and lower body mass index; however, baseline characteristics were well balanced across the groups after weighting. During a mean follow-up of 2.0 ± 0.7 years, there were 808 events (20.4%). The risk of the primary outcome in the middle (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78-1.10) and the highest dosage tertiles (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74-1.06) did not significantly differ compared with the lowest dosage tertile (p-value = 0.384). Regarding individual outcomes, there was no significant difference in HF hospitalization; however, there was a trend toward lower mortality with higher sacubitril/valsartan dose (p-value = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant difference was observed in the composite risk of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality across different sacubitril/valsartan dosage groups. This suggests that the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan treatment may not necessarily be dose-dependent.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02602-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: A minority of patients with heart failure (HF) are prescribed the maximal dose of the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan. We investigated the effectiveness of submaximal doses of sacubitril/valsartan in a real-world cohort.

Methods and results: Patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction prescribed sacubitril/valsartan for ≥ 180 days between 2016 and 2020 were included from a nationwide database, and categorized into tertiles based on the average daily sacubitril/valsartan dosage. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores. The primary outcome was a composite of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The study included 3,953 patients (age 62.6 ± 12.4 years, 73.0% men). Patients on lower sacubitril/valsartan doses were older, more likely to be women, and had more comorbidities, with lower blood pressure, reduced kidney function, and lower body mass index; however, baseline characteristics were well balanced across the groups after weighting. During a mean follow-up of 2.0 ± 0.7 years, there were 808 events (20.4%). The risk of the primary outcome in the middle (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78-1.10) and the highest dosage tertiles (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74-1.06) did not significantly differ compared with the lowest dosage tertile (p-value = 0.384). Regarding individual outcomes, there was no significant difference in HF hospitalization; however, there was a trend toward lower mortality with higher sacubitril/valsartan dose (p-value = 0.047).

Conclusions: No significant difference was observed in the composite risk of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality across different sacubitril/valsartan dosage groups. This suggests that the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan treatment may not necessarily be dose-dependent.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信