Impact of a transition of care bundle on health-related quality of life after major emergency abdominal surgery: before-and-after study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraf020
Dunja Kokotovic, Liv Í Soylu, Therese L Hansen, Julie B Knoblauch, Camilla B Balle, Lisbeth Jensen, Andrea Kiørboe, Simon Amled, Thomas K Jensen, Jakob Burcharth
{"title":"Impact of a transition of care bundle on health-related quality of life after major emergency abdominal surgery: before-and-after study.","authors":"Dunja Kokotovic, Liv Í Soylu, Therese L Hansen, Julie B Knoblauch, Camilla B Balle, Lisbeth Jensen, Andrea Kiørboe, Simon Amled, Thomas K Jensen, Jakob Burcharth","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The transition from hospital to home can be challenging. This study investigated whether a standardized transition of care bundle could enhance health-related quality of life (HRQoL), reduce readmission rates, and increase days alive and out of hospital after major emergency abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre before-and-after study including consecutive patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery was conducted at Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2023. A transition of care bundle including standardized discharge coordination, written material, and multidisciplinary information meetings for patients and relatives was implemented on 1 January 2023. Patients were followed up by phone interviews and hospital records. HRQoL was assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 667 patients were included (before group 333 patients (median age 70.9), after group 335 patients (median age 72.2)). The predominant surgical procedure was emergency laparotomy for bowel obstruction (before group: n = 187, 56.2%, after group: n = 171, 51.5%). HRQoL was significantly higher in the after group compared with the before group at postoperative day (POD) 30 (0.846 versus 0.750, P < 0.001), postoperative day 90 (0.925 versus 0.847, P < 0.001), and at postoperative day 180 (0.907 versus 0.875, P = 0.039). No difference in days alive and out of hospital or readmission was found between the groups. A significant reduction in patients transitioning to a rehabilitation facility at discharge was found in the after group versus before group (12.5% versus 23.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A transition of care bundle with coordination, written material, and multidisciplinary efforts increased HRQoL up to 180 days after major emergency abdominal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The transition from hospital to home can be challenging. This study investigated whether a standardized transition of care bundle could enhance health-related quality of life (HRQoL), reduce readmission rates, and increase days alive and out of hospital after major emergency abdominal surgery.

Methods: A single-centre before-and-after study including consecutive patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery was conducted at Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2023. A transition of care bundle including standardized discharge coordination, written material, and multidisciplinary information meetings for patients and relatives was implemented on 1 January 2023. Patients were followed up by phone interviews and hospital records. HRQoL was assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.

Results: A total of 667 patients were included (before group 333 patients (median age 70.9), after group 335 patients (median age 72.2)). The predominant surgical procedure was emergency laparotomy for bowel obstruction (before group: n = 187, 56.2%, after group: n = 171, 51.5%). HRQoL was significantly higher in the after group compared with the before group at postoperative day (POD) 30 (0.846 versus 0.750, P < 0.001), postoperative day 90 (0.925 versus 0.847, P < 0.001), and at postoperative day 180 (0.907 versus 0.875, P = 0.039). No difference in days alive and out of hospital or readmission was found between the groups. A significant reduction in patients transitioning to a rehabilitation facility at discharge was found in the after group versus before group (12.5% versus 23.3%).

Conclusions: A transition of care bundle with coordination, written material, and multidisciplinary efforts increased HRQoL up to 180 days after major emergency abdominal surgery.

简介从医院到家庭的过渡充满挑战。本研究调查了标准化的过渡护理包是否能提高健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)、降低再入院率、增加急诊腹部大手术后的存活天数和出院天数:方法:2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日,哥本哈根大学赫勒夫医院对接受大型急腹症手术的连续患者进行了一项前后对比的单中心研究。2023 年 1 月 1 日开始实施护理过渡包,包括标准化出院协调、书面材料以及针对患者和亲属的多学科信息会议。通过电话访谈和医院记录对患者进行了随访。通过 EQ-5D-5L 问卷对患者的 HRQoL 进行评估:共纳入 667 名患者(术前组 333 名(中位年龄 70.9 岁),术后组 335 名(中位年龄 72.2 岁))。最主要的手术方式是肠梗阻急诊开腹手术(术前组:187 人,56.2%;术后组:171 人,51.5%)。与术前组相比,术后组在术后第 30 天(0.846 对 0.750,P < 0.001)、术后第 90 天(0.925 对 0.847,P < 0.001)和术后第 180 天(0.907 对 0.875,P = 0.039)的 HRQoL 明显更高。两组患者的存活天数、出院天数或再入院天数均无差异。术后组与术前组相比,出院时转入康复机构的患者明显减少(12.5% 对 23.3%):结论:具有协调、书面材料和多学科努力的护理过渡包提高了大型急诊腹部手术后 180 天内的 HRQoL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信