Social Connectedness Profiles and Psychological Distress Among Adolescents in Summer Care Programs: A Cluster Analysis Approach.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tyler Prochnow, Sara A Flores, Laurel Curran, Emily Howell, Deja T Jackson, Megan S Patterson
{"title":"Social Connectedness Profiles and Psychological Distress Among Adolescents in Summer Care Programs: A Cluster Analysis Approach.","authors":"Tyler Prochnow, Sara A Flores, Laurel Curran, Emily Howell, Deja T Jackson, Megan S Patterson","doi":"10.1177/08901171251328559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study aimed to examine the relationship between distinct adolescent social connectedness profiles and psychological distress in a summer care program.DesignA longitudinal design was employed to capture changes over 10 weeks in summer.SettingThe study was conducted in a community-based care program which provided weekday care over a 10-week summer period.SampleThe sample consisted of 47 adolescents aged 10-14 years attending a summer care program.MeasuresSocial connectedness was assessed using adult and peer subscales of the Hemingway Measure of Adolescent Connectedness, while psychological distress was measured using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10).AnalysisTwo-step cluster analysis was used to identify distinct social connectedness profiles, and generalized estimating equations (GEE) examined psychological distress patterns between profiles over time, controlling for age and sex.ResultsTwo profiles emerged from the analysis: \"baseline bonders\" (n = 21) with moderate-low connectedness scores, and \"strong socializers\" (n = 26) with high connectedness scores, particularly with adults. GEE analysis revealed a significant time-by-profile interaction (β = -4.42, <i>P</i> = .017). Baseline bonders showed significant improvement in psychological distress (initial M = 22.46, final M = 19.20), while strong socializers remained stable (initial M = 17.38, final M = 18.54).ConclusionDistinct social connectedness profiles were associated with differential program effects on psychological distress. Findings suggest the need to better understand connectedness and distress profiles and trajectories across summer programing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251328559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251328559","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to examine the relationship between distinct adolescent social connectedness profiles and psychological distress in a summer care program.DesignA longitudinal design was employed to capture changes over 10 weeks in summer.SettingThe study was conducted in a community-based care program which provided weekday care over a 10-week summer period.SampleThe sample consisted of 47 adolescents aged 10-14 years attending a summer care program.MeasuresSocial connectedness was assessed using adult and peer subscales of the Hemingway Measure of Adolescent Connectedness, while psychological distress was measured using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10).AnalysisTwo-step cluster analysis was used to identify distinct social connectedness profiles, and generalized estimating equations (GEE) examined psychological distress patterns between profiles over time, controlling for age and sex.ResultsTwo profiles emerged from the analysis: "baseline bonders" (n = 21) with moderate-low connectedness scores, and "strong socializers" (n = 26) with high connectedness scores, particularly with adults. GEE analysis revealed a significant time-by-profile interaction (β = -4.42, P = .017). Baseline bonders showed significant improvement in psychological distress (initial M = 22.46, final M = 19.20), while strong socializers remained stable (initial M = 17.38, final M = 18.54).ConclusionDistinct social connectedness profiles were associated with differential program effects on psychological distress. Findings suggest the need to better understand connectedness and distress profiles and trajectories across summer programing.

社会连通性与青少年心理困扰:一项聚类分析方法。
目的本研究旨在探讨在暑期照顾项目中不同的青少年社会连通性与心理困扰的关系。设计采用纵向设计来捕捉夏季10周以上的变化。该研究是在一个社区护理项目中进行的,该项目在为期10周的夏季期间提供工作日护理。样本由47名10-14岁的青少年组成,他们参加了一个暑期护理项目。测量方法使用海明威青少年连通性量表的成人和同伴子量表来评估社会连通性,而使用凯斯勒心理困扰量表(K10)来测量心理困扰。两步聚类分析用于识别不同的社会联系概况,广义估计方程(GEE)在控制年龄和性别的情况下,随着时间的推移检查了概况之间的心理困扰模式。结果从分析中出现了两种情况:“基线粘结者”(n = 21)具有中低的连通性得分,“强社交者”(n = 26)具有高的连通性得分,特别是与成年人。GEE分析显示显著的时间-剖面相互作用(β = -4.42, P = 0.017)。基线粘结者的心理困扰有显著改善(初始M = 22.46,最终M = 19.20),而强社交者保持稳定(初始M = 17.38,最终M = 18.54)。结论不同的社会连通性特征与不同的心理困扰程序效应相关。研究结果表明,需要更好地了解整个夏季项目的连通性、痛苦概况和轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信