Drug-Event Pairs as Indicators for the Detection of Adverse Drug Reactions during Hospitalization in Routinely Collected Electronic Data Sources.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Anna Maria Wermund, Annette Haerdtlein, Wolfgang Fehrmann, Clara Weglage, Tobias Dreischulte, Ulrich Jaehde
{"title":"Drug-Event Pairs as Indicators for the Detection of Adverse Drug Reactions during Hospitalization in Routinely Collected Electronic Data Sources.","authors":"Anna Maria Wermund, Annette Haerdtlein, Wolfgang Fehrmann, Clara Weglage, Tobias Dreischulte, Ulrich Jaehde","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Identification of ADRs in clinical practice, surveillance and research is essential to prevent further harm. The aim of this study was to assess the likelihood of drugs contributing to clinically important inpatient adverse events, in order to provide a list of drug-event pairs indicating ADRs in electronic health record (EHR) data, referred to as \"indicators of ADRs\". We conducted a consensus process based on the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method for 14 ADRs. Experts were asked to rate the strength of the causal link between adverse events and potentially causative drugs on a 4-point Likert scale. Based on the median rating, drug-event pairs were categorized according to the likelihood of an ADR being present. Drug-event pairs with a median rating of ≥ 3 without disagreement were defined as indicators of certain and probable ADRs. Of the 255 drug-event pairs evaluated, 2 (1%) and 42 (16%) achieved consensus validation that they certainly and probably indicate an ADR. In addition, 137 drug-event pairs were considered as indicators of possible (54%) and 74 drug-event pairs were considered as indicators of unlikely (29%) ADRs. The provided set of content-validated indicators of clinically important inpatient ADRs can be used in clinical practice (e.g., decision support), surveillance (e.g., quality indicators) and research (e.g., outcome measures). They will be implemented in EHR data from German university hospitals to determine the prevalence of ADRs, support efficient use of pharmacist resources, and develop models predicting ADRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Identification of ADRs in clinical practice, surveillance and research is essential to prevent further harm. The aim of this study was to assess the likelihood of drugs contributing to clinically important inpatient adverse events, in order to provide a list of drug-event pairs indicating ADRs in electronic health record (EHR) data, referred to as "indicators of ADRs". We conducted a consensus process based on the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method for 14 ADRs. Experts were asked to rate the strength of the causal link between adverse events and potentially causative drugs on a 4-point Likert scale. Based on the median rating, drug-event pairs were categorized according to the likelihood of an ADR being present. Drug-event pairs with a median rating of ≥ 3 without disagreement were defined as indicators of certain and probable ADRs. Of the 255 drug-event pairs evaluated, 2 (1%) and 42 (16%) achieved consensus validation that they certainly and probably indicate an ADR. In addition, 137 drug-event pairs were considered as indicators of possible (54%) and 74 drug-event pairs were considered as indicators of unlikely (29%) ADRs. The provided set of content-validated indicators of clinically important inpatient ADRs can be used in clinical practice (e.g., decision support), surveillance (e.g., quality indicators) and research (e.g., outcome measures). They will be implemented in EHR data from German university hospitals to determine the prevalence of ADRs, support efficient use of pharmacist resources, and develop models predicting ADRs.

药物-事件对作为常规收集电子数据源中住院期间药物不良反应检测的指标。
药物不良反应(adr)是住院患者发病和死亡的常见原因。在临床实践、监测和研究中识别不良反应对于防止进一步伤害至关重要。本研究的目的是评估药物导致临床重要住院不良事件的可能性,以便提供电子健康记录(EHR)数据中指示adr的药物-事件对列表,称为“adr指标”。我们基于RAND/UCLA适当性方法对14种adr进行了共识过程。专家们被要求对不良事件和潜在致病药物之间的因果关系强度进行4分李克特评分。根据中位数评分,根据出现不良反应的可能性对药物-事件对进行分类。中位数评分≥3且无差异的药物事件对被定义为某些和可能的adr的指标。在评估的255个药物事件对中,2个(1%)和42个(16%)获得了肯定且可能提示ADR的共识验证。此外,137对药物-事件对被认为是可能(54%)的指标,74对药物-事件对被认为是不太可能(29%)的指标。所提供的一套经过内容验证的临床重要住院患者不良反应指标可用于临床实践(例如,决策支持)、监测(例如,质量指标)和研究(例如,结果测量)。它们将在德国大学医院的电子病历数据中实施,以确定不良反应的患病率,支持有效利用药剂师资源,并开发预测不良反应的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信