Impaired reward sensitivity in Parkinson's depression is unresponsive to dopamine treatment.

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Pub Date : 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1093/brain/awaf098
Harry Costello, Yumeya Yamamori, Karel Kieslich, Mackenzie Murphy, Kamilla Bobyreva, Anette-Eleonore Schrag, Robert Howard, Jonathan P Roiser
{"title":"Impaired reward sensitivity in Parkinson's depression is unresponsive to dopamine treatment.","authors":"Harry Costello, Yumeya Yamamori, Karel Kieslich, Mackenzie Murphy, Kamilla Bobyreva, Anette-Eleonore Schrag, Robert Howard, Jonathan P Roiser","doi":"10.1093/brain/awaf098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Willingness to exert effort for a given goal is dependent on the magnitude of the potential rewards and effort costs of an action. Such effort-based decision making is an essential component of motivation, in which the dopaminergic system plays a key role. Depression in Parkinson's disease (PD) is common, disabling and has poor outcomes. Motivational symptoms such as apathy and anhedonia are prominent in PD depression and related to dopaminergic loss. We hypothesized that dopamine-dependent disruption in effort-based decision making contributes to depression in PD. In the present study, an effort-based decision-making task was administered to 62 patients with PD, with and without depression, ON and OFF their dopaminergic medication across two sessions, as well as to 34 patients with depression and 29 matched controls on a single occasion. During the task, on each trial, participants decided whether to accept or reject offers of different levels of monetary reward in return for exerting varying levels of physical effort via grip force, measured using individually calibrated dynamometers. The primary outcome variable was choice (accept/decline offer), analysed using both logistic mixed-effects modelling and a computational model which dissected the individual contributions of reward and effort on depression and dopamine state in PD. We found PD depression was characterized by lower acceptance of offers, driven by markedly lower incentivization by reward (reward sensitivity), compared to all other groups. Within-subjects analysis of the effect of dopamine medication revealed that, although dopamine treatment improves reward sensitivity in non-depressed PD patients, this therapeutic effect is not present in PD patients with depression. These findings suggest that disrupted effort-based decision making, unresponsive to dopamine, contributes to PD depression. This highlights reward sensitivity as a key mechanism and treatment target for PD depression that potentially requires non-dopaminergic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":" ","pages":"2122-2134"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Willingness to exert effort for a given goal is dependent on the magnitude of the potential rewards and effort costs of an action. Such effort-based decision making is an essential component of motivation, in which the dopaminergic system plays a key role. Depression in Parkinson's disease (PD) is common, disabling and has poor outcomes. Motivational symptoms such as apathy and anhedonia are prominent in PD depression and related to dopaminergic loss. We hypothesized that dopamine-dependent disruption in effort-based decision making contributes to depression in PD. In the present study, an effort-based decision-making task was administered to 62 patients with PD, with and without depression, ON and OFF their dopaminergic medication across two sessions, as well as to 34 patients with depression and 29 matched controls on a single occasion. During the task, on each trial, participants decided whether to accept or reject offers of different levels of monetary reward in return for exerting varying levels of physical effort via grip force, measured using individually calibrated dynamometers. The primary outcome variable was choice (accept/decline offer), analysed using both logistic mixed-effects modelling and a computational model which dissected the individual contributions of reward and effort on depression and dopamine state in PD. We found PD depression was characterized by lower acceptance of offers, driven by markedly lower incentivization by reward (reward sensitivity), compared to all other groups. Within-subjects analysis of the effect of dopamine medication revealed that, although dopamine treatment improves reward sensitivity in non-depressed PD patients, this therapeutic effect is not present in PD patients with depression. These findings suggest that disrupted effort-based decision making, unresponsive to dopamine, contributes to PD depression. This highlights reward sensitivity as a key mechanism and treatment target for PD depression that potentially requires non-dopaminergic therapies.

帕金森抑郁症的奖励敏感性受损对多巴胺治疗无反应。
为既定目标付出努力的意愿取决于行动的潜在回报和努力成本的大小。这种基于努力的决策是动机的重要组成部分,其中多巴胺能系统起着关键作用。帕金森病(PD)的抑郁症很常见,致残且预后不佳。动机症状,如冷漠和快感缺乏,在PD抑郁症中很突出,并与多巴胺能丧失有关。我们假设在基于努力的决策中多巴胺依赖的中断有助于PD患者的抑郁。在本研究中,对62名PD患者进行了基于努力的决策任务,这些患者有和没有抑郁症,在两个疗程中开和关多巴胺能药物,以及34名抑郁症患者和29名匹配的对照组。在每次试验中,参与者决定是否接受或拒绝不同程度的金钱奖励,作为施加不同程度的体力努力的回报,握力是使用单独校准的测力计测量的。主要结果变量是选择(接受/拒绝提议),使用逻辑混合效应模型和计算模型进行分析,该模型分析了奖励和努力对PD患者抑郁和多巴胺状态的个人贡献。我们发现,与所有其他组相比,PD抑郁症的特点是受奖励激励(奖励敏感性)明显较低的驱动,对提议的接受度较低。多巴胺药物治疗效果的受试者内分析显示,虽然多巴胺治疗改善了非抑郁PD患者的奖励敏感性,但这种治疗效果在抑郁症PD患者中不存在。这些发现表明,基于努力的决策被打乱,对多巴胺没有反应,会导致PD抑郁症。这突出了奖励敏感性作为PD抑郁症的关键机制和治疗靶点,可能需要非多巴胺能治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信