Impact of rehabilitation in the neurointensive care unit on long-term survival in patients with traumatic brain injury.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kristin Alvsåker, Rolf Hanoa, Jon Michael Gran, Lisa Maria Högvall, Carl Johan Fredstedt Sogn, Halvard Cartfjord Bech, Theresa Olasveengen
{"title":"Impact of rehabilitation in the neurointensive care unit on long-term survival in patients with traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Kristin Alvsåker, Rolf Hanoa, Jon Michael Gran, Lisa Maria Högvall, Carl Johan Fredstedt Sogn, Halvard Cartfjord Bech, Theresa Olasveengen","doi":"10.1111/aas.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aimed to compare the difference in long-term mortality in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) receiving Early interdisciplinary rehabilitation (EIR) in our Neurointensive Care Unit (NICU) to patients being discharged from NICU without EIR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational cohort study of adults aged 18-67 years with moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-14), admitted to the NICU for >72 h from 2010 to 2022. We analyzed mortality differences from the start of follow-up (cessation of sedation in the Standard of care (SC) group and start of EIR in the EIR group) until 31.12.2023, using inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Adjustments using weights were made for various variables, including age, days from injury to follow-up start, sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and injury characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 698 patients were included, 461 received EIR and 237 SC. Sixty-three (27%) patients in the SC group and 59 (13%) patients in the EIR group died by the end of follow-up. In covariate-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves, estimated survival at the end of follow-up was 56% (95% CI 0.36, 0.69) for the SC group and 74% (95% CI 0.58, 0.83) for the EIR group. Both groups had the highest mortality rate within 30 days. The mortality in the EIR group was significantly lower with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) at 30 days of 0.57 (95% CI 0.37, 0.87) p-value = .010, and at the end of follow-up of 0.56 (95% CI 0.36, 0.89), p-value = .015.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients receiving EIR had better long-term survival, with both groups experiencing the highest mortality rate early on. Early rehabilitation in NICU may play an important role in preventing and identifying medical complications and should be explored as a potential mechanism in future prospective trials.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>Neurorehabilitation following intensive care for traumatic brain injury is important to help the patients regain function. However, it is uncertain whether survival is improved by the initiation of interdisciplinary rehabilitation already during neurointensive care, consisting of mobilization and training activities of daily living as well as swallowing. This study compared long-term survival in a retrospective cohort of patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury and found that those receiving early rehabilitation had a higher long-term survival, which persisted for up to 13 years but was mainly due to improved survival during the first 3 months. Whether this is due to physiological effects or an increased enthusiasm among healthcare providers to continue active treatment is unknown and should be further explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 4","pages":"e70026"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to compare the difference in long-term mortality in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) receiving Early interdisciplinary rehabilitation (EIR) in our Neurointensive Care Unit (NICU) to patients being discharged from NICU without EIR.

Methods: Retrospective observational cohort study of adults aged 18-67 years with moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-14), admitted to the NICU for >72 h from 2010 to 2022. We analyzed mortality differences from the start of follow-up (cessation of sedation in the Standard of care (SC) group and start of EIR in the EIR group) until 31.12.2023, using inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Adjustments using weights were made for various variables, including age, days from injury to follow-up start, sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and injury characteristics.

Results: A total of 698 patients were included, 461 received EIR and 237 SC. Sixty-three (27%) patients in the SC group and 59 (13%) patients in the EIR group died by the end of follow-up. In covariate-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves, estimated survival at the end of follow-up was 56% (95% CI 0.36, 0.69) for the SC group and 74% (95% CI 0.58, 0.83) for the EIR group. Both groups had the highest mortality rate within 30 days. The mortality in the EIR group was significantly lower with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) at 30 days of 0.57 (95% CI 0.37, 0.87) p-value = .010, and at the end of follow-up of 0.56 (95% CI 0.36, 0.89), p-value = .015.

Conclusions: Patients receiving EIR had better long-term survival, with both groups experiencing the highest mortality rate early on. Early rehabilitation in NICU may play an important role in preventing and identifying medical complications and should be explored as a potential mechanism in future prospective trials.

Editorial comment: Neurorehabilitation following intensive care for traumatic brain injury is important to help the patients regain function. However, it is uncertain whether survival is improved by the initiation of interdisciplinary rehabilitation already during neurointensive care, consisting of mobilization and training activities of daily living as well as swallowing. This study compared long-term survival in a retrospective cohort of patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury and found that those receiving early rehabilitation had a higher long-term survival, which persisted for up to 13 years but was mainly due to improved survival during the first 3 months. Whether this is due to physiological effects or an increased enthusiasm among healthcare providers to continue active treatment is unknown and should be further explored.

神经重症监护室康复对创伤性脑损伤患者长期生存的影响。
背景:本研究旨在比较在我院神经重症监护病房(NICU)接受早期跨学科康复(EIR)治疗的中重度颅脑损伤(TBI)患者与未接受EIR治疗的NICU出院患者的长期死亡率差异。方法:回顾性观察队列研究,研究对象为2010年至2022年NICU收治的18-67岁中重度TBI (Glasgow昏迷评分3-14)患者,住院时间为bb1072小时。我们使用治疗逆概率加权Cox比例风险模型和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析了从随访开始(标准护理(SC)组停止镇静和EIR组开始EIR)到2023年12月31日的死亡率差异。使用权重对各种变量进行调整,包括年龄、从受伤到随访开始的天数、社会人口统计学因素、合并症和损伤特征。结果:共纳入698例患者,其中461例接受EIR治疗,237例接受SC治疗。随访结束时,SC组死亡63例(27%),EIR组死亡59例(13%)。在协变量校正的Kaplan-Meier曲线中,随访结束时,SC组的估计生存率为56% (95% CI 0.36, 0.69), EIR组的估计生存率为74% (95% CI 0.58, 0.83)。两组在30天内的死亡率最高。EIR组的死亡率显著降低,30天校正风险比(HR)为0.57 (95% CI 0.37, 0.87) p值=。随访结束时为0.56 (95% CI 0.36, 0.89), p值= 0.015。结论:接受EIR治疗的患者有更好的长期生存率,两组患者早期死亡率最高。新生儿重症监护病房的早期康复可能在预防和识别医学并发症方面发挥重要作用,并应在未来的前瞻性试验中探讨其潜在机制。编辑评论:创伤性脑损伤重症监护后的神经康复对帮助患者恢复功能非常重要。然而,尚不确定是否在神经重症监护期间开始跨学科康复,包括日常生活的动员和训练活动以及吞咽,从而提高生存率。这项研究比较了一组中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的长期生存率,发现那些接受早期康复治疗的患者有更高的长期生存率,持续长达13年,但主要是由于前3个月生存率的提高。这是由于生理作用还是由于医疗保健提供者继续积极治疗的热情增加,尚不清楚,应进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信