The J-PAS survey: The effect of photometric redshift errors on cosmic voids

IF 5.8 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
J. A. Mansour, L. J. Liivamägi, A. Tamm, J. Laur, R. Abramo, E. Tempel, R. Kipper, A. Hernán-Caballero, V. Marra, J. Alcaniz, N. Benitez, S. Bonoli, S. Carneiro, J. Cenarro, D. Cristóbal-Hornillos, R. Dupke, A. Ederoclite, C. Hernández-Monteagudo, C. López-Sanjuan, A. Marín-Franch, C. M. de Oliveira, M. Moles, L. Sodré Jr, K. Taylor, J. Varela, H. Vázquez Ramió
{"title":"The J-PAS survey: The effect of photometric redshift errors on cosmic voids","authors":"J. A. Mansour, L. J. Liivamägi, A. Tamm, J. Laur, R. Abramo, E. Tempel, R. Kipper, A. Hernán-Caballero, V. Marra, J. Alcaniz, N. Benitez, S. Bonoli, S. Carneiro, J. Cenarro, D. Cristóbal-Hornillos, R. Dupke, A. Ederoclite, C. Hernández-Monteagudo, C. López-Sanjuan, A. Marín-Franch, C. M. de Oliveira, M. Moles, L. Sodré Jr, K. Taylor, J. Varela, H. Vázquez Ramió","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202452732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Aims.<i/> We investigated the impact of photometric redshift errors in the ongoing Javalambre Physics of the Accelerating Universe Astrophysical Survey (J-PAS) on void identification and void properties using a watershed-based method. Our aim is to assess the recovery of individual voids and the overall void environment.<i>Methods.<i/> We created galaxy mock catalogues for a redshift of <i>z<i/> = 0.1, using the IllustrisTNG300-1 simulation and defining two datasets: an <i>ideal<i/> sample (<i>m<i/><sub><i>r<i/><sub/> < 21 mag) and a <i>perturbed<i/> sample with the Z-coordinate errors mimicking J-PAS’s line-of-sight errors, derived from the precursor miniJPAS survey data. We identified voids using the watershed algorithm ZOBOV.<i>Results.<i/> We found 1065 voids in the <i>ideal<i/> sample and 2558 voids in the <i>perturbed<i/> sample. The <i>perturbed<i/> sample voids have, on average, smaller sizes and denser interiors. We filtered out voids based on density and radius to eliminate overdense and small spurious instances. The stacked density profile of filtered voids in the <i>perturbed<i/> sample remains close to the average density, even at the boundary peak, indicating a strong blurring of structures by the redshift errors. The number of the <i>ideal<i/> sample voids for which at least 50% of the volume is recovered by a void in the <i>perturbed<i/> sample is 53 (29 for the filtered sample). The volume occupied by these voids is less than 10% of the simulation volume. Merging voids in the <i>perturbed<i/> sample marginally improves the recovery. The overall volumes defined as voids in the two samples have an overlap of 80%, making up 61% of the simulation box volume.<i>Conclusions.<i/> While some statistical properties of voids might be recovered sufficiently well, the watershed algorithms may not be optimal for recovering the large-scale structure voids if they are applied directly to photometric redshift survey data.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452732","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims. We investigated the impact of photometric redshift errors in the ongoing Javalambre Physics of the Accelerating Universe Astrophysical Survey (J-PAS) on void identification and void properties using a watershed-based method. Our aim is to assess the recovery of individual voids and the overall void environment.Methods. We created galaxy mock catalogues for a redshift of z = 0.1, using the IllustrisTNG300-1 simulation and defining two datasets: an ideal sample (mr < 21 mag) and a perturbed sample with the Z-coordinate errors mimicking J-PAS’s line-of-sight errors, derived from the precursor miniJPAS survey data. We identified voids using the watershed algorithm ZOBOV.Results. We found 1065 voids in the ideal sample and 2558 voids in the perturbed sample. The perturbed sample voids have, on average, smaller sizes and denser interiors. We filtered out voids based on density and radius to eliminate overdense and small spurious instances. The stacked density profile of filtered voids in the perturbed sample remains close to the average density, even at the boundary peak, indicating a strong blurring of structures by the redshift errors. The number of the ideal sample voids for which at least 50% of the volume is recovered by a void in the perturbed sample is 53 (29 for the filtered sample). The volume occupied by these voids is less than 10% of the simulation volume. Merging voids in the perturbed sample marginally improves the recovery. The overall volumes defined as voids in the two samples have an overlap of 80%, making up 61% of the simulation box volume.Conclusions. While some statistical properties of voids might be recovered sufficiently well, the watershed algorithms may not be optimal for recovering the large-scale structure voids if they are applied directly to photometric redshift survey data.
J-PAS巡天:光度红移误差对宇宙空洞的影响
目标。利用基于分水岭的方法研究了正在进行的加速宇宙天体物理调查(J-PAS) Javalambre物理中光度红移误差对空洞识别和空洞性质的影响。我们的目的是评估单个空洞和整体空洞环境的恢复。我们创建了红移为z = 0.1的星系模拟目录,使用IllustrisTNG300-1模拟并定义了两个数据集:一个理想样本(mr摄动样本,其z坐标误差模仿J-PAS的视线误差,源自miniJPAS的前体调查数据。我们使用分水岭算法ZOBOV.Results来识别空洞。我们在理想样品中发现1065个空洞,在扰动样品中发现2558个空洞。平均而言,受扰动的样品空洞尺寸更小,内部密度更大。我们根据密度和半径过滤掉空洞,以消除过密和小的虚假实例。在受扰动的样品中,过滤后的空洞的堆积密度分布仍然接近于平均密度,即使在边界峰处也是如此,这表明红移误差对结构产生了强烈的模糊。扰动样品中至少有50%的体积被空隙回收的理想样品空隙数为53(过滤后的样品为29)。这些空隙占用的体积小于模拟体积的10%。在扰动样品中合并空隙略微提高了回收率。两个样本中定义为空隙的总体体积重叠80%,占模拟盒体积的61%。虽然可以很好地恢复空洞的一些统计特性,但如果直接应用于光度红移测量数据,分水岭算法可能不是恢复大规模结构空洞的最佳算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Astronomy & Astrophysics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
27.70%
发文量
2105
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信