'Why would I go somewhere where I'm not welcome?' Dehumanisation of people experiencing homelessness in medical settings and the healing potential of a structurally competent model: a qualitative study.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001881
Ren Bruguera, Alicia Agnoli, Pamela Suzanne Portnoy, Liliana Melgoza, Na'amah Razon
{"title":"'Why would I go somewhere where I'm not welcome?' Dehumanisation of people experiencing homelessness in medical settings and the healing potential of a structurally competent model: a qualitative study.","authors":"Ren Bruguera, Alicia Agnoli, Pamela Suzanne Portnoy, Liliana Melgoza, Na'amah Razon","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People experiencing homelessness (PEH) face myriad barriers to healthcare, including preventative sexual health services. A street medicine team in one Northern California county observed low uptake of sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening among PEH. We conducted this study to understand the factors contributing to PEH's decision to seek or accept STI screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a qualitative study using semistructured interviews and demographics surveys among PEH. The interviews focused on understanding facilitators and barriers to STI screening and experiences in healthcare settings more broadly. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thorough memoing process and matrix-based analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled a total of 50 adult, English-speaking PEH: 24 men, 26 women; 52% white, 28% Black/African American, 22% Native American, 4% Asian, 22% Hispanic/Latino. Qualitative analysis revealed a theme of 'dehumanising' prior experiences in healthcare environments including judgement, dismissal of medical concerns, and denial of treatment. Participants reported similar experiences outside of medical settings, which together shaped their self-worth and factored into their decision to delay seeking routine and urgent forms of care, including STI screening. Approximately half of the participants had received medical services from the street medicine team. PEH perceived the street medicine team to foster trust by physically, emotionally and structurally 'meeting patients where they are'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prior experiences of exclusion within and outside of healthcare settings informed PEH's decision to avoid seeking healthcare until extremely urgent, and to deprioritise services like STI screening. In order to develop interventions to increase STI screening and other preventative health services, it is critical to understand the structural elements underlying relationships between PEH and healthcare systems, and the relevance of social exclusion beyond medicine. This street medicine team exemplifies features of structural competency, a model that may be integrated in other settings and in medical education to promote more equitable and inclusive healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001881"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) face myriad barriers to healthcare, including preventative sexual health services. A street medicine team in one Northern California county observed low uptake of sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening among PEH. We conducted this study to understand the factors contributing to PEH's decision to seek or accept STI screening.

Methods: This is a qualitative study using semistructured interviews and demographics surveys among PEH. The interviews focused on understanding facilitators and barriers to STI screening and experiences in healthcare settings more broadly. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thorough memoing process and matrix-based analysis.

Results: We enrolled a total of 50 adult, English-speaking PEH: 24 men, 26 women; 52% white, 28% Black/African American, 22% Native American, 4% Asian, 22% Hispanic/Latino. Qualitative analysis revealed a theme of 'dehumanising' prior experiences in healthcare environments including judgement, dismissal of medical concerns, and denial of treatment. Participants reported similar experiences outside of medical settings, which together shaped their self-worth and factored into their decision to delay seeking routine and urgent forms of care, including STI screening. Approximately half of the participants had received medical services from the street medicine team. PEH perceived the street medicine team to foster trust by physically, emotionally and structurally 'meeting patients where they are'.

Conclusion: Prior experiences of exclusion within and outside of healthcare settings informed PEH's decision to avoid seeking healthcare until extremely urgent, and to deprioritise services like STI screening. In order to develop interventions to increase STI screening and other preventative health services, it is critical to understand the structural elements underlying relationships between PEH and healthcare systems, and the relevance of social exclusion beyond medicine. This street medicine team exemplifies features of structural competency, a model that may be integrated in other settings and in medical education to promote more equitable and inclusive healthcare.

“我为什么要去一个不受欢迎的地方呢?”医疗环境中无家可归者的非人化和结构胜任模式的治愈潜力:一项定性研究。
导言:无家可归者(PEH)在获得医疗保健(包括预防性性健康服务)方面面临重重障碍。据北加州一个县的街头医疗小组观察,无家可归者对性传播感染(STI)筛查的接受率很低。我们开展了这项研究,以了解导致 PEH 决定寻求或接受性传播感染筛查的因素:这是一项采用半结构式访谈和人口统计学调查对 PEH 进行的定性研究。访谈的重点是了解性传播感染筛查的促进因素和障碍,以及更广泛的医疗保健环境中的经验。我们对访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用全面的备忘过程和矩阵分析法对访谈进行了分析:我们共招募了 50 名讲英语的成年 PEH:24 名男性,26 名女性;52% 为白人,28% 为黑人/非洲裔美国人,22% 为美国本土人,4% 为亚洲人,22% 为西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人。定性分析揭示了一个主题,即之前在医疗环境中的 "非人化 "经历,包括评判、忽视医疗问题和拒绝治疗。参与者报告了在医疗环境之外的类似经历,这些经历共同塑造了他们的自我价值,也是他们决定推迟寻求常规和紧急医疗服务(包括性传播感染筛查)的原因。大约一半的参与者接受过街头医疗队提供的医疗服务。PEH认为,街头医疗队通过在身体、情感和结构上 "满足病人的需要 "来促进信任:之前在医疗机构内外受到排斥的经历使 PEH 决定不到万不得已不寻求医疗服务,并且不优先考虑性传播感染筛查等服务。为了制定干预措施以增加性传播感染筛查和其他预防性保健服务,了解 PEH 与医疗保健系统之间关系的结构性因素以及医学以外的社会排斥的相关性至关重要。这支街头医疗队体现了结构性能力的特征,这种模式可融入其他环境和医学教育中,以促进更公平、更具包容性的医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信