Measuring misaligned contraceptive use among reproductive-aged women in Kisumu, Kenya: a cross-sectional, population-based study.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001671
Brooke W Bullington, Stephanie Chung, Claire W Rothschild, Dickens Onyango, Leigh Senderowicz, Emilia Goland, Abigael Mwanyiro, Ben Wekesa, Brian Frizzelle, Ginger Golub, Katherine Tumlinson
{"title":"Measuring misaligned contraceptive use among reproductive-aged women in Kisumu, Kenya: a cross-sectional, population-based study.","authors":"Brooke W Bullington, Stephanie Chung, Claire W Rothschild, Dickens Onyango, Leigh Senderowicz, Emilia Goland, Abigael Mwanyiro, Ben Wekesa, Brian Frizzelle, Ginger Golub, Katherine Tumlinson","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Global family planning scholars have critiqued traditional measures of programmatic success and called for new, person-centred measures that consider people's preferences. We propose a new measure that assesses the alignment between an individual's contraceptive desires and use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use data from a population-based survey implemented among adult reproductive-aged women in Kisumu, Kenya. We define misaligned contraceptive use as discordance between contraceptive desires and use (ie, desire for contraception paired with non-use or no desire for contraception paired with use). We expand misaligned use to incorporate non-preferred contraceptive method use, defined as the use of a method with a preference for a different method among contraceptive users. We also compare unmet need for family planning with misaligned use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our total sample, including contraceptive users and non-users, 86% of participants had aligned contraceptive use and 14% had misaligned use. Among contraceptive users, we found that 74% of participants had aligned and preferred method use, 21% had aligned and non-preferred method use, 2% had misaligned and preferred use, and 3% had misaligned and non-preferred use. Our comparison of misaligned use and unmet need showed little agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measuring misaligned and non-preferred contraceptive method use has implications for family planning measurement and programming. Our results demonstrate the importance of capturing contraceptive desires rather than assuming an implicit desire for contraception among those who do not desire pregnancy. Further, incorporating method preferences into misaligned use provides additional detail on who does and does not have their contraceptive desires met. Finally, measuring misaligned and non-preferred method use highlights subsets of populations who may benefit from additional contraceptive programming to improve contraceptive access or enable method discontinuation or switching, and therefore can be imperative to ensuring that individuals have their reproductive desires realised.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Global family planning scholars have critiqued traditional measures of programmatic success and called for new, person-centred measures that consider people's preferences. We propose a new measure that assesses the alignment between an individual's contraceptive desires and use.

Methods: We use data from a population-based survey implemented among adult reproductive-aged women in Kisumu, Kenya. We define misaligned contraceptive use as discordance between contraceptive desires and use (ie, desire for contraception paired with non-use or no desire for contraception paired with use). We expand misaligned use to incorporate non-preferred contraceptive method use, defined as the use of a method with a preference for a different method among contraceptive users. We also compare unmet need for family planning with misaligned use.

Results: In our total sample, including contraceptive users and non-users, 86% of participants had aligned contraceptive use and 14% had misaligned use. Among contraceptive users, we found that 74% of participants had aligned and preferred method use, 21% had aligned and non-preferred method use, 2% had misaligned and preferred use, and 3% had misaligned and non-preferred use. Our comparison of misaligned use and unmet need showed little agreement.

Conclusions: Measuring misaligned and non-preferred contraceptive method use has implications for family planning measurement and programming. Our results demonstrate the importance of capturing contraceptive desires rather than assuming an implicit desire for contraception among those who do not desire pregnancy. Further, incorporating method preferences into misaligned use provides additional detail on who does and does not have their contraceptive desires met. Finally, measuring misaligned and non-preferred method use highlights subsets of populations who may benefit from additional contraceptive programming to improve contraceptive access or enable method discontinuation or switching, and therefore can be imperative to ensuring that individuals have their reproductive desires realised.

测量肯尼亚基苏木育龄妇女避孕药具使用偏差:一项基于人口的横断面研究。
导言:全球计划生育学者批评了传统的方案成功的措施,并呼吁新的,以人为本的措施,考虑到人们的偏好。我们提出了一种新的措施,评估个人的避孕愿望和使用之间的一致性。方法:我们使用了一项基于人口的调查数据,该调查是在肯尼亚基苏木的成年育龄妇女中实施的。我们将不一致的避孕使用定义为避孕愿望与使用之间的不一致(即,有避孕愿望与不使用配对或没有避孕愿望与使用配对)。我们将不当使用扩大到纳入非首选避孕方法的使用,定义为在避孕使用者中使用偏好不同方法的方法。我们还比较了未满足的计划生育需求和使用不当。结果:在我们的总样本中,包括避孕药具使用者和非使用者,86%的参与者有一致的避孕药具使用,14%有不一致的使用。在避孕药具使用者中,我们发现74%的参与者使用了一致和首选的方法,21%的人使用了一致和非首选的方法,2%的人使用了不一致和首选的方法,3%的人使用了不一致和非首选的方法。我们对不一致的使用和未满足的需求的比较显示出很少的一致。结论:测量失调和非首选避孕方法的使用对计划生育测量和规划具有重要意义。我们的结果证明了捕获避孕欲望的重要性,而不是假设那些不想怀孕的人有避孕的隐性欲望。此外,将方法偏好纳入不一致的使用提供了更多的细节,说明哪些人的避孕愿望得到了满足,哪些人的避孕愿望没有得到满足。最后,测量不一致和非首选方法的使用突出了可能从额外的避孕规划中受益的人群子集,以改善避孕可及性或使方法停止或转换,因此对于确保个人实现其生殖愿望是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信