Development and Early Validation of A Survey Instrument for Measuring Patient Engagement in Pain Management.

Yea-Jen Hsu, Traci J Speed, Ariana Prinzbach, Olivia Sutton, Eileen M McDonald, Amro Khasawneh, Samuel Kim, Ima Samba, Ronen Shechter, Marie N Hanna, Jill A Marsteller, Anping Xie
{"title":"Development and Early Validation of A Survey Instrument for Measuring Patient Engagement in Pain Management.","authors":"Yea-Jen Hsu, Traci J Speed, Ariana Prinzbach, Olivia Sutton, Eileen M McDonald, Amro Khasawneh, Samuel Kim, Ima Samba, Ronen Shechter, Marie N Hanna, Jill A Marsteller, Anping Xie","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efforts to improve patient engagement in pain management are often hindered by inconsistent definitions and measurements. To address this gap, we developed and pilot-tested the 15-item Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey. A systematic review of 77 survey instruments identified 6 key constructs of patient engagement, and semi-structured interviews with 36 patients and 3 providers from the Johns Hopkins Personalized Pain Program informed its development. The initial 33-item survey was refined to 15 items, and usability and test-retest reliability were evaluated with 60 Personalized Pain Program patients. The median completion time was 3.5 minutes, with minimal missing data (<0.5%). Most respondents (96-100%) found the questions relevant, with higher average scores for patient-provider communication (3.6-4.5 on a 5-point scale) and lower scores for adherence challenges. Although the Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey demonstrated good usability and applicability, further studies are needed to enhance its test-retest reliability and psychometric validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efforts to improve patient engagement in pain management are often hindered by inconsistent definitions and measurements. To address this gap, we developed and pilot-tested the 15-item Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey. A systematic review of 77 survey instruments identified 6 key constructs of patient engagement, and semi-structured interviews with 36 patients and 3 providers from the Johns Hopkins Personalized Pain Program informed its development. The initial 33-item survey was refined to 15 items, and usability and test-retest reliability were evaluated with 60 Personalized Pain Program patients. The median completion time was 3.5 minutes, with minimal missing data (<0.5%). Most respondents (96-100%) found the questions relevant, with higher average scores for patient-provider communication (3.6-4.5 on a 5-point scale) and lower scores for adherence challenges. Although the Patient Engagement in Pain Management survey demonstrated good usability and applicability, further studies are needed to enhance its test-retest reliability and psychometric validation.

一种测量患者参与疼痛管理的调查工具的开发和早期验证。
由于定义和测量方法不一致,提高患者参与疼痛管理的努力常常受到阻碍。为了弥补这一不足,我们开发并试用了由 15 个项目组成的 "患者参与疼痛管理调查"。我们对 77 种调查工具进行了系统回顾,确定了患者参与度的 6 个关键结构,并对来自约翰霍普金斯大学个性化疼痛项目的 36 名患者和 3 名医疗服务提供者进行了半结构化访谈,为调查工具的开发提供了依据。最初的 33 个调查项目被细化为 15 个项目,并对 60 名个性化疼痛项目患者进行了可用性和重复测试可靠性评估。中位完成时间为 3.5 分钟,数据缺失率极低 (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信