Variation in the Use of Guideline-Based Care by Prenatal Site: Decomposing the Disparity in Preterm Birth for Non-Hispanic Black Women.

Patricia McGaughey, Renata E Howland
{"title":"Variation in the Use of Guideline-Based Care by Prenatal Site: Decomposing the Disparity in Preterm Birth for Non-Hispanic Black Women.","authors":"Patricia McGaughey, Renata E Howland","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite longstanding status as a public health priority, preterm birth rates continue to be higher among non-Hispanic Black women compared with other racial and ethnic groups. A growing body of literature highlights the site of care as a key factor in pregnancy outcomes. Although research shows that many individuals do not receive guideline-based prenatal care, little is known about site-level variation in the use of recommended prenatal services and its potential relationship with Black-White preterm birth disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional cohort study, we analyzed variation in site-level use of 4 key prenatal services: tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap) vaccination, [per the CDC website] and screening for bacteriuria, diabetes, and group Beta streptococcus, using administrative data from New York State Medicaid and the American Community Survey. We used multivariable logistic regressions to estimate the odds of attending a low-use site (mean <2 services per patient) by race and ethnicity, controlling for age, high-poverty residential address, and low prenatal care attendance. We performed Fairlie decomposition analyses to quantify the contribution of individual and site-level factors to the observed difference in preterm birth rates among Black and White non-Hispanic women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Site-level use of recommended prenatal services ranged from an average of 1 to 3.6 services per patient. Non-Hispanic Black women had more than twice the odds (adjusted odds ratio, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.32-2.52) of attending a low-use site compared with non-Hispanic White women. Among factors in the decomposition analysis, site-level screening for bacteriuria and diabetes accounted for the highest proportion of the explained variance in the observed preterm birth rates for non-Hispanic Black (10.7%) and non-Hispanic White (6.7%) women.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results from this research support immediate improvement in guideline-based prenatal care to narrow the gap in preterm birth for non-Hispanic Black women. Research is needed to identify and correct site-level barriers to recommended prenatal services.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite longstanding status as a public health priority, preterm birth rates continue to be higher among non-Hispanic Black women compared with other racial and ethnic groups. A growing body of literature highlights the site of care as a key factor in pregnancy outcomes. Although research shows that many individuals do not receive guideline-based prenatal care, little is known about site-level variation in the use of recommended prenatal services and its potential relationship with Black-White preterm birth disparities.

Methods: In this cross-sectional cohort study, we analyzed variation in site-level use of 4 key prenatal services: tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap) vaccination, [per the CDC website] and screening for bacteriuria, diabetes, and group Beta streptococcus, using administrative data from New York State Medicaid and the American Community Survey. We used multivariable logistic regressions to estimate the odds of attending a low-use site (mean <2 services per patient) by race and ethnicity, controlling for age, high-poverty residential address, and low prenatal care attendance. We performed Fairlie decomposition analyses to quantify the contribution of individual and site-level factors to the observed difference in preterm birth rates among Black and White non-Hispanic women.

Results: Site-level use of recommended prenatal services ranged from an average of 1 to 3.6 services per patient. Non-Hispanic Black women had more than twice the odds (adjusted odds ratio, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.32-2.52) of attending a low-use site compared with non-Hispanic White women. Among factors in the decomposition analysis, site-level screening for bacteriuria and diabetes accounted for the highest proportion of the explained variance in the observed preterm birth rates for non-Hispanic Black (10.7%) and non-Hispanic White (6.7%) women.

Discussion: Results from this research support immediate improvement in guideline-based prenatal care to narrow the gap in preterm birth for non-Hispanic Black women. Research is needed to identify and correct site-level barriers to recommended prenatal services.

产前地点使用指南护理的差异:分解非西班牙裔黑人妇女早产的差异。
导言:尽管长期以来一直是公共卫生优先事项,但与其他种族和族裔群体相比,非西班牙裔黑人妇女的早产率仍然较高。越来越多的文献强调护理地点是影响妊娠结局的关键因素。尽管研究表明,许多人没有接受基于指南的产前护理,但对使用推荐产前服务的地点水平差异及其与黑人-白人早产差异的潜在关系知之甚少。方法:在这项横断面队列研究中,我们分析了4项关键产前服务在不同地点的使用变化:破伤风、白喉和百日咳(Tdap)疫苗接种,[根据CDC网站]以及细菌、糖尿病和β组链球菌筛查,使用来自纽约州医疗补助和美国社区调查的行政数据。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来估计到低使用率站点的几率(平均结果:站点水平推荐的产前服务的使用范围为每位患者平均1至3.6个服务。非西班牙裔黑人女性有两倍多的几率(调整后的优势比,2.42;95% CI, 2.32-2.52),与非西班牙裔白人妇女相比,参加低使用率场所。在分解分析的因素中,对非西班牙裔黑人妇女(10.7%)和非西班牙裔白人妇女(6.7%)的观察到的早产率的解释差异中,细菌和糖尿病的现场水平筛查占最高比例。讨论:本研究结果支持立即改进基于指南的产前护理,以缩小非西班牙裔黑人妇女早产的差距。需要进行研究,以确定和纠正对所建议的产前服务的场所障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信