LGB (lesbian, gay, and bisexual) state policy protections and substance use disparities.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-03-14 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf029
Alice Guan, Paul Wesson, David V Glidden, Rita Hamad, Judy Y Tan, Scarlett L Gomez
{"title":"LGB (lesbian, gay, and bisexual) state policy protections and substance use disparities.","authors":"Alice Guan, Paul Wesson, David V Glidden, Rita Hamad, Judy Y Tan, Scarlett L Gomez","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>LGB (lesbian, gay, and bisexual) individuals have higher rates of tobacco and alcohol use than the general population. While protective social policies have been found to reduce these disparities, their long-term impact remains largely unknown. In this study, we used data from waves 3 (2001-2002) and 4 (2008-2009) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health to assess the impact of exposure to LGB state policy protections during emerging adulthood on substance use in young adulthood. Using multivariable Poisson models, we evaluated whether emerging adulthood was a critical period of exposure and quantified the relative reduction in substance use disparities between LGB and heterosexual individuals living in more protective states. Findings suggest that LGB individuals living in states with more policy protections during emerging adulthood had a significantly lower prevalence of tobacco use and binge drinking in young adulthood compared with those in less protective states. These findings were not observed among heterosexual individuals, indicating that policy effects were specific to LGB individuals. Furthermore, these protections appeared to reduce overall substance use disparities, especially among female participants. It is critical to continue evaluating policy protections to safeguard the health of the LGB community, especially considering the potential erosion of these vital protections.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxaf029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

LGB (lesbian, gay, and bisexual) individuals have higher rates of tobacco and alcohol use than the general population. While protective social policies have been found to reduce these disparities, their long-term impact remains largely unknown. In this study, we used data from waves 3 (2001-2002) and 4 (2008-2009) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health to assess the impact of exposure to LGB state policy protections during emerging adulthood on substance use in young adulthood. Using multivariable Poisson models, we evaluated whether emerging adulthood was a critical period of exposure and quantified the relative reduction in substance use disparities between LGB and heterosexual individuals living in more protective states. Findings suggest that LGB individuals living in states with more policy protections during emerging adulthood had a significantly lower prevalence of tobacco use and binge drinking in young adulthood compared with those in less protective states. These findings were not observed among heterosexual individuals, indicating that policy effects were specific to LGB individuals. Furthermore, these protections appeared to reduce overall substance use disparities, especially among female participants. It is critical to continue evaluating policy protections to safeguard the health of the LGB community, especially considering the potential erosion of these vital protections.

LGB(女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋)国家政策保护和物质使用差异。
LGB(女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋)个体吸烟和饮酒的比例高于一般人群。虽然保护性社会政策已被发现可以缩小这些差距,但其长期影响在很大程度上仍然未知。在这项研究中,我们使用了国家青少年到成人健康纵向研究的第3波(2001-2002)和第4波(2008-2009)的数据来评估成年初期接触LGB国家政策保护对成年早期物质使用的影响。使用多变量泊松模型,我们评估了成年初期是否是暴露的关键时期,并量化了生活在更多保护状态下的LGB和异性恋个体之间物质使用差异的相对减少。研究结果表明,生活在成年初期有更多政策保护的州的LGB个体在成年早期吸烟和酗酒的患病率明显低于那些保护较少的州。这些发现在异性恋个体中没有观察到,这表明政策的影响是针对LGB个体的。此外,这些保护措施似乎减少了总体药物使用差异,特别是在女性参与者中。至关重要的是继续评估政策保护,以保障LGB群体的健康,特别是考虑到这些至关重要的保护可能受到侵蚀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信