Health state utilities associated with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP).

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Louis S Matza, Nan Li, Katie D Stewart, Mahmoud Hashim, Tom Denee, Feng Pan, Qiaoyi Zhang, Jennifer Lee, Michel Michaelides, Hendrik P N Scholl
{"title":"Health state utilities associated with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP).","authors":"Louis S Matza, Nan Li, Katie D Stewart, Mahmoud Hashim, Tom Denee, Feng Pan, Qiaoyi Zhang, Jennifer Lee, Michel Michaelides, Hendrik P N Scholl","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01761-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) is a rare, inherited retinal disease characterized by impairment in visual field and visual acuity with continuous progression leading to blindness. Gene therapies for XLRP are under investigation, and health state utilities are needed for use in cost-utility analyses examining the value of these treatments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to estimate utilities associated with XLRP severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven health state vignettes depicting combinations of impairment in visual field and visual acuity associated with XLRP were developed based on literature review and input from clinicians, patients, and a caregiver. Vignettes included text describing visual acuity impairment, visual field impairment, night blindness, impact on quality of life, and two images representing the combination of visual field and visual acuity impairment for each health state. Health states were valued in time trade-off interviews with general population respondents in the UK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 245 participants completed interviews (51.0% female; mean age = 41.4 years; Newcastle, n = 80; London, n = 85; Edinburgh, n = 80). In a ranking task, participants preferred health states with less severe visual impairment, and this preference was reflected in the utilities. Mean (standard deviation) utilities ranged from 0.900 (0.121) for the health state with no visual acuity impairment and mild visual field impairment to 0.271 (0.478) for the health state describing blindness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results highlight the substantial impact of visual impairment on health state preference and quality of life. The health state utilities estimated in this study may be appropriate for use in cost-effectiveness models evaluating treatments for XLRP.</p><p><strong>Jel classification codes: </strong>I1; I12; I19.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01761-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) is a rare, inherited retinal disease characterized by impairment in visual field and visual acuity with continuous progression leading to blindness. Gene therapies for XLRP are under investigation, and health state utilities are needed for use in cost-utility analyses examining the value of these treatments.

Objective: This study aimed to estimate utilities associated with XLRP severity.

Methods: Eleven health state vignettes depicting combinations of impairment in visual field and visual acuity associated with XLRP were developed based on literature review and input from clinicians, patients, and a caregiver. Vignettes included text describing visual acuity impairment, visual field impairment, night blindness, impact on quality of life, and two images representing the combination of visual field and visual acuity impairment for each health state. Health states were valued in time trade-off interviews with general population respondents in the UK.

Results: A total of 245 participants completed interviews (51.0% female; mean age = 41.4 years; Newcastle, n = 80; London, n = 85; Edinburgh, n = 80). In a ranking task, participants preferred health states with less severe visual impairment, and this preference was reflected in the utilities. Mean (standard deviation) utilities ranged from 0.900 (0.121) for the health state with no visual acuity impairment and mild visual field impairment to 0.271 (0.478) for the health state describing blindness.

Conclusion: Results highlight the substantial impact of visual impairment on health state preference and quality of life. The health state utilities estimated in this study may be appropriate for use in cost-effectiveness models evaluating treatments for XLRP.

Jel classification codes: I1; I12; I19.

与x连锁视网膜色素变性(XLRP)相关的健康状态公用事业。
背景:x连锁色素性视网膜炎(XLRP)是一种罕见的遗传性视网膜疾病,其特征是视野和视力受损,并持续进展导致失明。XLRP的基因疗法正在研究中,需要健康国家公用事业单位用于成本效用分析,以检查这些治疗的价值。目的:本研究旨在评估与XLRP严重程度相关的效用。方法:根据文献综述和临床医生、患者和护理人员的意见,制作了11个健康状态小插图,描述与XLRP相关的视野和视力损害的组合。小插图包括描述视力障碍、视野障碍、夜盲症、对生活质量的影响的文字,以及代表每种健康状态的视野和视力障碍组合的两幅图像。在英国,健康状况在与普通人群受访者的时间权衡访谈中得到了重视。结果:共245名参与者完成访谈,其中女性51.0%;平均年龄41.4岁;纽卡斯尔,n = 80;伦敦,n = 85;爱丁堡,n = 80)。在排序任务中,参与者更喜欢视力障碍较轻的健康状态,这种偏好反映在效用中。平均(标准偏差)效用范围从无视力障碍和轻度视野障碍的健康状态的0.900(0.121)到描述失明的健康状态的0.271(0.478)。结论:研究结果突出了视力障碍对健康状态偏好和生活质量的重大影响。本研究中估计的健康状态效用可能适合用于评估XLRP治疗的成本效益模型。凝胶分类代码:I1;I12;I19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信