Adult Only Intestinal Retransplant Is Associated With Higher Rates of Graft Failure, Acute Rejection, and Mortality: A United Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION
Laura M Cogua, Connor J Tupper, Meng-Hao Li, Naoru Koizumi, Jorge Ortiz
{"title":"Adult Only Intestinal Retransplant Is Associated With Higher Rates of Graft Failure, Acute Rejection, and Mortality: A United Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis.","authors":"Laura M Cogua, Connor J Tupper, Meng-Hao Li, Naoru Koizumi, Jorge Ortiz","doi":"10.6002/ect.2025.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adult intestinal retransplant has increased substantially during the past decade, outpacing the rate of primary transplants to become the fourth most common reason for intestinal transplant. Although intestinal retransplant is a viable option for patients with failed transplants, long-term survival is often lower. We compared intestinal retransplant to primary intestinal transplant for rates of graft failure, acute rejection, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We collected data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database for intestinal retransplant and first-time intestinal transplant for the period from 2010 to 2024. We compared recipient and deceased donor characteristics of primary intestinal transplant alone and intestinal retransplant via Pearson chi-square tests. We contrasted graft failure, mortality, and acute rejection by using log-rank tests, multivariate Cox analysis, and logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We selected 741 patients; 60 (8.1%) were intestinal retransplant recipients. On log-rank tests, intestinal retransplant showed 20% higher rate of graft failure and mortality after 5 years (P < .001). Regression analysis showed that retransplant was associated with 61% higher rate of graft failure (hazard ratio = 1.615, P = .002), 107% higher rate of acute rejection (odds ratio = 2.072, P = .049), and an 82% increase in mortality (hazard ratio = 1.823, P < .001). No associations between sex, race and ethnicity, or induction or maintenance regimens and graft failure or mortality for intestinal retransplant were shown.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adult intestinal retransplant was associated with higher rates of graft failure related to rejection and infection, and retransplant status was associated with higher rates of graft failure and mortality. No associations between different regimens of induction or maintenance and graft failure or mortality were shown. Race/ethnicity and sex did not affect graft failure or mortality. Further research of intestinal retransplant will improve knowledge of risk factors associated with negative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50467,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation","volume":"23 2","pages":"97-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2025.0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Adult intestinal retransplant has increased substantially during the past decade, outpacing the rate of primary transplants to become the fourth most common reason for intestinal transplant. Although intestinal retransplant is a viable option for patients with failed transplants, long-term survival is often lower. We compared intestinal retransplant to primary intestinal transplant for rates of graft failure, acute rejection, and mortality.

Materials and methods: We collected data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database for intestinal retransplant and first-time intestinal transplant for the period from 2010 to 2024. We compared recipient and deceased donor characteristics of primary intestinal transplant alone and intestinal retransplant via Pearson chi-square tests. We contrasted graft failure, mortality, and acute rejection by using log-rank tests, multivariate Cox analysis, and logistic regression analysis.

Results: We selected 741 patients; 60 (8.1%) were intestinal retransplant recipients. On log-rank tests, intestinal retransplant showed 20% higher rate of graft failure and mortality after 5 years (P < .001). Regression analysis showed that retransplant was associated with 61% higher rate of graft failure (hazard ratio = 1.615, P = .002), 107% higher rate of acute rejection (odds ratio = 2.072, P = .049), and an 82% increase in mortality (hazard ratio = 1.823, P < .001). No associations between sex, race and ethnicity, or induction or maintenance regimens and graft failure or mortality for intestinal retransplant were shown.

Conclusions: Adult intestinal retransplant was associated with higher rates of graft failure related to rejection and infection, and retransplant status was associated with higher rates of graft failure and mortality. No associations between different regimens of induction or maintenance and graft failure or mortality were shown. Race/ethnicity and sex did not affect graft failure or mortality. Further research of intestinal retransplant will improve knowledge of risk factors associated with negative outcomes.

成人仅肠再移植与更高的移植失败率、急性排斥反应和死亡率相关:器官共享数据库分析联合网络
目的:在过去的十年中,成人肠道再移植的数量大幅增加,超过了一次移植的比例,成为第四大常见的肠道移植原因。虽然肠道再移植是移植失败患者的可行选择,但长期生存率往往较低。我们比较了肠再移植和初次肠移植的移植失败率、急性排斥反应和死亡率。材料与方法:收集美国器官共享网络(United Network for Organ Sharing) 2010 - 2024年肠道再移植和首次肠道移植数据。我们通过Pearson卡方检验比较了单独进行一次肠道移植和再次进行肠道移植的受者和已故供者的特征。我们通过对数秩检验、多变量Cox分析和逻辑回归分析对比了移植失败、死亡率和急性排斥反应。结果:入选741例患者;60例(8.1%)为肠道再移植受者。在log-rank测试中,5年后肠再移植的失败率和死亡率高出20% (P < 0.001)。回归分析显示,再次移植与移植失败率增加61%(危险比= 1.615,P = 0.002),急性排斥反应率增加107%(危险比= 2.072,P = 0.049),死亡率增加82%(危险比= 1.823,P < 0.001)相关。性别、种族和民族、诱导或维持方案与肠再移植的移植物失败或死亡率之间没有关联。结论:成人肠道再移植与排斥反应和感染相关的移植失败率较高相关,再移植状态与移植失败率和死亡率较高相关。不同的诱导或维持方案与移植物衰竭或死亡率之间没有关联。种族/民族和性别对移植物衰竭或死亡率没有影响。肠道再移植的进一步研究将提高对不良预后相关危险因素的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal includes the following: Surgical techniques, innovations, and novelties; Immunobiology and immunosuppression; Clinical results; Complications; Infection; Malignancies; Organ donation; Organ and tissue procurement and preservation; Sociological and ethical issues; Xenotransplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信