Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures: a comparative cohort study comparing orthogonal double plating to suprapectineal quadrilateral surface (QLS) plate osteosynthesis.

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Felix Kordes, Emre Yilmaz, Matthias Königshausen, Thomas A Schildhauer, Martin F Hoffmann
{"title":"Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures: a comparative cohort study comparing orthogonal double plating to suprapectineal quadrilateral surface (QLS) plate osteosynthesis.","authors":"Felix Kordes, Emre Yilmaz, Matthias Königshausen, Thomas A Schildhauer, Martin F Hoffmann","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04251-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acetabular fractures often require stabilization. Fractures involving the quadrilateral plate (QP) remain challenging due to complex anatomy and minimal bone stock. Treatment options include orthogonal double plate fixation or anatomically preformed suprapectineal quadrilateral surface (QLS) plates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a series of buttress plating of acetabular fractures (OTA/AO 62) comparing orthogonal double plate and QLS plate osteosynthesis regarding surgical procedure, complications, and outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At one level I trauma center, 109 patients underwent internal fixation either by orthogonal double plate osteosynthesis or by preshaped QLS plate. Surgical approach was performed via the first and third windows of the ilioinguinal approach. Reduction quality and osteosynthesis material were checked using CT. Groups were retrospectively evaluated regarding demographic factors, classification, and trauma mechanism. Clinical outcome was assessed utilizing the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Follow-up was 25 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fractures were stabilized using orthogonal double plate osteosynthesis (56%) and QLS plates (44%). Following OTA/AO classification, 16 type A (14.7%), 69 type B (63.3%), and 24 type C (22.0%) fractures underwent treatment. Groups did not differ regarding fracture types, age, or BMI. The majority was male (75%). High-energy trauma accounted for 39.4%. Surgery averaged 187.43 min for orthogonal double plates and 163.13 min for the QLS plate (p = 0.012). No differences were found regarding hospital stay or complications. Neither postoperative osteoarthritis nor mHHS was related to plate type. Patients with high-energy trauma had better mHHS outcomes. Preexisting osteoarthritis resulted in reduced outcome.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Acetabular fracture stabilization is challenging due to extensive approaches, minimal bone stock of the QP, and difficult plate placement. Our analysis confirms that orthogonal double plate fixation and QLS plates provide secure stabilization for acetabular fractures. According to our findings, utilization of the QLS plate may result in reduced OR time due to its anatomically tailored shape.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04251-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acetabular fractures often require stabilization. Fractures involving the quadrilateral plate (QP) remain challenging due to complex anatomy and minimal bone stock. Treatment options include orthogonal double plate fixation or anatomically preformed suprapectineal quadrilateral surface (QLS) plates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a series of buttress plating of acetabular fractures (OTA/AO 62) comparing orthogonal double plate and QLS plate osteosynthesis regarding surgical procedure, complications, and outcome.

Methods: At one level I trauma center, 109 patients underwent internal fixation either by orthogonal double plate osteosynthesis or by preshaped QLS plate. Surgical approach was performed via the first and third windows of the ilioinguinal approach. Reduction quality and osteosynthesis material were checked using CT. Groups were retrospectively evaluated regarding demographic factors, classification, and trauma mechanism. Clinical outcome was assessed utilizing the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Follow-up was 25 months.

Results: Fractures were stabilized using orthogonal double plate osteosynthesis (56%) and QLS plates (44%). Following OTA/AO classification, 16 type A (14.7%), 69 type B (63.3%), and 24 type C (22.0%) fractures underwent treatment. Groups did not differ regarding fracture types, age, or BMI. The majority was male (75%). High-energy trauma accounted for 39.4%. Surgery averaged 187.43 min for orthogonal double plates and 163.13 min for the QLS plate (p = 0.012). No differences were found regarding hospital stay or complications. Neither postoperative osteoarthritis nor mHHS was related to plate type. Patients with high-energy trauma had better mHHS outcomes. Preexisting osteoarthritis resulted in reduced outcome.

Discussion: Acetabular fracture stabilization is challenging due to extensive approaches, minimal bone stock of the QP, and difficult plate placement. Our analysis confirms that orthogonal double plate fixation and QLS plates provide secure stabilization for acetabular fractures. According to our findings, utilization of the QLS plate may result in reduced OR time due to its anatomically tailored shape.

髋臼骨折的外科治疗:一项比较正交双钢板与阴蒂上四边形钢板(QLS)接骨术的队列研究。
背景:髋臼骨折通常需要稳定。由于复杂的解剖结构和极少的骨存量,涉及四边形钢板(QP)的骨折仍然具有挑战性。治疗方案包括正交双钢板固定或解剖预制的阴蒂上四边形钢板。本研究的目的是评估一系列髋臼骨折的支撑钢板(OTA/ ao62),比较正交双钢板和QLS钢板在手术过程、并发症和结果方面的差异。方法:在某一级外伤中心,109例患者采用正交双钢板内固定或预成型QLS钢板内固定。手术入路通过髂腹股沟入路的第一和第三个窗口进行。CT检查复位质量和骨固定材料。回顾性评估各组人口统计学因素、分类和创伤机制。采用改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)评估临床结果。随访25个月。结果:采用正交双钢板固定骨折(56%)和QLS钢板固定骨折(44%)。根据OTA/AO分类,治疗A型骨折16例(14.7%),B型骨折69例(63.3%),C型骨折24例(22.0%)。各组在骨折类型、年龄或BMI方面没有差异。大多数是男性(75%)。高能创伤占39.4%。正交双钢板平均手术时间为187.43分钟,QLS钢板平均手术时间为163.13分钟(p = 0.012)。在住院时间和并发症方面没有发现差异。术后骨关节炎和mHHS均与钢板类型无关。高能创伤患者的mHHS预后较好。先前存在的骨关节炎导致预后降低。讨论:髋臼骨折的稳定是具有挑战性的,因为入路广泛,QP的骨量很少,并且难以放置钢板。我们的分析证实,正交双钢板固定和QLS钢板可为髋臼骨折提供安全稳定。根据我们的研究结果,由于QLS钢板的解剖形状,使用它可以减少手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书