A Mixed Methods SEIPS-based Evaluation of a Patient-centered ED Discharge Process Redesign for Older Adults.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001328
Pascale Carayon, Kathryn Wust, Hanna J Barton, Manish N Shah, Paula Vw Dail, Barbara J King, Denise M Buckley, Brad Ehlenfeldt, Brian W Patterson, Peter Hoonakker, Nicole E Werner
{"title":"A Mixed Methods SEIPS-based Evaluation of a Patient-centered ED Discharge Process Redesign for Older Adults.","authors":"Pascale Carayon, Kathryn Wust, Hanna J Barton, Manish N Shah, Paula Vw Dail, Barbara J King, Denise M Buckley, Brad Ehlenfeldt, Brian W Patterson, Peter Hoonakker, Nicole E Werner","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The transition of older adults from the emergency department (ED) to home remains a potential area of preventable harm. Through a human-centered design process, we developed a patient-centered intervention aimed at improving communication and coordination between ED staff and patients. The intervention included a new electronic health record (EHR)-based template for physicians to enter discharge instructions, a redesigned after-visit-summary (AVS), enhanced nurse training for patient teach-back, and EHR-embedded tips for nurses at the time of follow-up call. Our research objective was to evaluate this patient-centered ED discharge process redesign from multiple perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the SEIPS 3.0 model, we evaluated the intervention, in particular work system barriers and facilitators in the 3 subprocesses of the redesigned ED discharge process: physician writing discharge instructions, nurse/patient communication at discharge, and nurse/patient communication at follow-up call. We used multiple methods to collect quantitative and qualitative data from the perspectives of patients, and ED physicians and nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the redesigned patient-centered discharge process was perceived positively by ED physicians and advanced practice providers, ED nurses, and patients. All 3 groups identified work system facilitators regarding the intervention, in particular the usability of the AVS. Work system barriers pointed to areas for future improvement of the intervention, such as adding prepopulated information to the AVS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a human-centered design process, we improved ED discharge for older adults. Our SEIPS-based research and evaluation fit with the learning health system concept as it provides input for future work system and patient safety improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":"203-212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The transition of older adults from the emergency department (ED) to home remains a potential area of preventable harm. Through a human-centered design process, we developed a patient-centered intervention aimed at improving communication and coordination between ED staff and patients. The intervention included a new electronic health record (EHR)-based template for physicians to enter discharge instructions, a redesigned after-visit-summary (AVS), enhanced nurse training for patient teach-back, and EHR-embedded tips for nurses at the time of follow-up call. Our research objective was to evaluate this patient-centered ED discharge process redesign from multiple perspectives.

Methods: Using the SEIPS 3.0 model, we evaluated the intervention, in particular work system barriers and facilitators in the 3 subprocesses of the redesigned ED discharge process: physician writing discharge instructions, nurse/patient communication at discharge, and nurse/patient communication at follow-up call. We used multiple methods to collect quantitative and qualitative data from the perspectives of patients, and ED physicians and nurses.

Results: Overall, the redesigned patient-centered discharge process was perceived positively by ED physicians and advanced practice providers, ED nurses, and patients. All 3 groups identified work system facilitators regarding the intervention, in particular the usability of the AVS. Work system barriers pointed to areas for future improvement of the intervention, such as adding prepopulated information to the AVS.

Conclusions: Using a human-centered design process, we improved ED discharge for older adults. Our SEIPS-based research and evaluation fit with the learning health system concept as it provides input for future work system and patient safety improvement.

以患者为中心的老年人急诊科出院流程重新设计的混合方法seips评价。
目的:老年人从急诊科(ED)到家庭的过渡仍然是一个潜在的可预防伤害领域。通过以人为本的设计过程,我们开发了一种以患者为中心的干预措施,旨在改善急诊科工作人员与患者之间的沟通和协调。干预措施包括一个新的基于电子健康记录(EHR)的模板,供医生输入出院指示,一个重新设计的就诊后总结(AVS),加强护士培训以进行患者反馈,以及在随访电话时为护士提供嵌入电子健康记录的提示。我们的研究目的是从多个角度评估这种以患者为中心的急诊科出院流程的重新设计。方法:采用SEIPS 3.0模型,对重新设计的急诊科出院流程的3个子流程(医生撰写出院说明、出院时护患沟通、随访时护患沟通)进行干预,特别是工作系统障碍和促进因素进行评估。我们采用多种方法从患者、急诊科医生和护士的角度收集定量和定性数据。结果:总体而言,重新设计的以患者为中心的出院流程得到了急诊科医生、高级执业医师、急诊科护士和患者的积极评价。所有三个小组都确定了有关干预的工作系统促进者,特别是AVS的可用性。工作系统的障碍指出了未来干预改进的领域,例如向AVS添加预填充信息。结论:采用以人为本的设计流程,我们改善了老年人ED的出院情况。我们基于seips的研究和评估符合学习型卫生系统的概念,因为它为未来的工作系统和患者安全改进提供了输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信