Modified double fascicular nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries - A series of 32 cases.

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jham.2025.100239
Kannan Karuppiah Kumar, Thomas Chandy, Krishan Prasad, Tejus Ganesh
{"title":"Modified double fascicular nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries - A series of 32 cases.","authors":"Kannan Karuppiah Kumar, Thomas Chandy, Krishan Prasad, Tejus Ganesh","doi":"10.1016/j.jham.2025.100239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elbow flexion restoration is one of the most important objectives of brachial plexus surgery in upper root injuries. Many authors have shown very good results with double fascicular nerve transfers and it has become the mainstay of nerve transfers for elbow flexion restoration. We present the results of a modified version of this double fascicular transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 32 patients who underwent the modified double fascicular nerve transfer(i.e median n to n to biceps and ulnar n to n to brachialis) was done. The average duration for delay in surgery from the time of injury was 5.6 months. The average age of the patients was 35.84. The average follow up of the patients was 39.3months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had M0 or M1 power preoperatively. Eight patients had M3 power and 22 patients had M4 or M4+ power post operatively. Two patients did not recover meaningful elbow flexion. The results were similar to the original double fascicular nerve transfer for elbow flexion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified version of the double fascicular nerve transfer is as reliable and produces similar results to the original double fascicular transfer. The theoretical advantages include the ease of doing the operation - (i) The n to biceps and median n are closer. (ii) The length of the n to brachialis allows it to be swung across the arm to reach the more posterior and medial ulnar nerve.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"100239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jham.2025.100239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elbow flexion restoration is one of the most important objectives of brachial plexus surgery in upper root injuries. Many authors have shown very good results with double fascicular nerve transfers and it has become the mainstay of nerve transfers for elbow flexion restoration. We present the results of a modified version of this double fascicular transfer.

Methods: A retrospective study of 32 patients who underwent the modified double fascicular nerve transfer(i.e median n to n to biceps and ulnar n to n to brachialis) was done. The average duration for delay in surgery from the time of injury was 5.6 months. The average age of the patients was 35.84. The average follow up of the patients was 39.3months.

Results: All patients had M0 or M1 power preoperatively. Eight patients had M3 power and 22 patients had M4 or M4+ power post operatively. Two patients did not recover meaningful elbow flexion. The results were similar to the original double fascicular nerve transfer for elbow flexion.

Conclusion: The modified version of the double fascicular nerve transfer is as reliable and produces similar results to the original double fascicular transfer. The theoretical advantages include the ease of doing the operation - (i) The n to biceps and median n are closer. (ii) The length of the n to brachialis allows it to be swung across the arm to reach the more posterior and medial ulnar nerve.

改良双束神经移植恢复臂丛损伤肘关节屈曲32例。
背景:肘关节屈曲恢复是臂丛手术治疗上根损伤的重要目标之一。许多作者已经证明双束神经移植的效果非常好,它已成为神经移植治疗肘关节屈曲的主要方法。我们提出了一个修改版本的结果,这种双束转移。方法:对32例行改良双束神经移植术的患者进行回顾性研究。E正中n到n到肱二头肌尺骨n到n到肱肌)从受伤开始延迟手术的平均时间为5.6个月。患者平均年龄35.84岁。患者平均随访39.3个月。结果:所有患者术前均有M0或M1功率。术后M3功率8例,M4或M4+功率22例。2例患者肘关节屈曲未恢复。结果与原双束神经转移治疗肘关节屈曲相似。结论:改良后的双束神经移植与原双束神经移植一样可靠,效果相近。理论上的优点包括易于操作- (i) n到肱二头肌和中位数n更接近。(ii) n到肱肌的长度允许它在手臂上摆动,到达更后方和内侧的尺神经。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信