Assessment and diagnosis of non-traumatic shoulder instability: A scoping review.

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Antoine Tisserand, Anju Jaggi, Philippe-Antoine David, Thomas Lathiere
{"title":"Assessment and diagnosis of non-traumatic shoulder instability: A scoping review.","authors":"Antoine Tisserand, Anju Jaggi, Philippe-Antoine David, Thomas Lathiere","doi":"10.1177/17585732251320070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given its complexity, there is no consensus regarding the assessment of non-traumatic shoulder instability (NTSI) to this day. We, therefore, conducted a scoping review to map the existing white and grey literature regarding diagnostic and assessment tools for the NTSI population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We followed the Arksey and O'Malley five-stage guideline for the conduct of scoping reviews and searched through 12 electronic databases for English-language articles and reviews from 2000 to 2024 related to NTSI's diagnosis and assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 3426 identified studies, 58 were included (describing 59 different interventions). Case-control studies (43.1%, 25/58) and narrative reviews (34.5%, 20/58) were the most prevalent. Diagnostic imaging was the most studied intervention (35.6%, 21/59). Twenty-seven studies specified a direction of instability, of which 59% (16/27) were multidirectional instability. Non-traumatic shoulder instability often affects young individuals, with complex symptoms, including neuromotor deficits, muscular imbalances and kinematic alterations, involving psycho-behavioural and somatosensory components.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Non-traumatic shoulder instability's aetiologies and clinical manifestations are multifactorial. The prevalence and incidence of this dysfunction are probably underestimated. Clinical history is crucial to retrace a complex and chronic dysfunction. The use of orthopaedic shoulder tests and the routine use of imaging currently appear to have limited relevance as a first-line approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732251320070"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251320070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given its complexity, there is no consensus regarding the assessment of non-traumatic shoulder instability (NTSI) to this day. We, therefore, conducted a scoping review to map the existing white and grey literature regarding diagnostic and assessment tools for the NTSI population.

Method: We followed the Arksey and O'Malley five-stage guideline for the conduct of scoping reviews and searched through 12 electronic databases for English-language articles and reviews from 2000 to 2024 related to NTSI's diagnosis and assessment tools.

Results: Among the 3426 identified studies, 58 were included (describing 59 different interventions). Case-control studies (43.1%, 25/58) and narrative reviews (34.5%, 20/58) were the most prevalent. Diagnostic imaging was the most studied intervention (35.6%, 21/59). Twenty-seven studies specified a direction of instability, of which 59% (16/27) were multidirectional instability. Non-traumatic shoulder instability often affects young individuals, with complex symptoms, including neuromotor deficits, muscular imbalances and kinematic alterations, involving psycho-behavioural and somatosensory components.

Discussion: Non-traumatic shoulder instability's aetiologies and clinical manifestations are multifactorial. The prevalence and incidence of this dysfunction are probably underestimated. Clinical history is crucial to retrace a complex and chronic dysfunction. The use of orthopaedic shoulder tests and the routine use of imaging currently appear to have limited relevance as a first-line approach.

评估和诊断非外伤性肩关节不稳:范围回顾。
背景:鉴于其复杂性,迄今为止对非外伤性肩部不稳定(NTSI)的评估尚无共识。因此,我们进行了一项范围审查,以绘制有关NTSI人群诊断和评估工具的现有白色和灰色文献。方法:我们遵循Arksey和O'Malley五阶段指南进行范围评价,并在12个电子数据库中检索2000年至2024年与NTSI诊断和评估工具相关的英文文章和评论。结果:在确认的3426项研究中,58项被纳入(描述了59种不同的干预措施)。病例对照研究(43.1%,25/58)和叙述性综述(34.5%,20/58)最为普遍。诊断性影像学是研究最多的干预措施(35.6%,21/59)。27项研究明确了不稳定的方向,其中59%(16/27)为多向不稳定。非外伤性肩部不稳定常影响年轻人,其症状复杂,包括神经运动缺陷、肌肉不平衡和运动学改变,涉及心理-行为和体感成分。讨论:非外伤性肩关节不稳的病因和临床表现是多因素的。这种功能障碍的患病率和发生率可能被低估了。临床病史是追溯复杂和慢性功能障碍的关键。目前,骨科肩部检查和常规影像学检查作为一线治疗方法的相关性似乎有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信