"Hope at a better chance": perspectives on genetic counseling and testing among black individuals with prostate cancer.

IF 1.5 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Breanne Prindeville, Brittany M Szymaniak, Samantha E Greenberg, Adam B Murphy, Ashley E Ross, Debra Duquette
{"title":"\"Hope at a better chance\": perspectives on genetic counseling and testing among black individuals with prostate cancer.","authors":"Breanne Prindeville, Brittany M Szymaniak, Samantha E Greenberg, Adam B Murphy, Ashley E Ross, Debra Duquette","doi":"10.1007/s12687-025-00785-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Black individuals have the highest prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality rates of any racial or ethnic group. Racial disparities persist in the understanding and uptake of genetics services, while the perspectives of Black individuals with PCa regarding genetic counseling and germline genetic testing for inherited cancer risk (GC/GT) remains understudied. This qualitative study explored attitudes, facilitators, and barriers to awareness, interest, and uptake of GC/GT among Black individuals with PCa. Eight individuals who self-identified as African American and/or Black with a personal history of PCa participated in individual telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. Interview transcripts were analyzed using both an inductive and deductive coding approach, constant comparison, and selective coding. Five major themes were identified: (1) uncertainty surrounding personal relevance of GC/GT, (2) family influence and impact of GC/GT, (3) healthcare providers and institutions as gatekeepers of GC/GT, (4) community identity, influence, and impact of GC/GT, and (5) systemic barriers to GC/GT exemplify larger structural constraints. A key finding was the influence of community, a collective identity among Black individuals and a desire to benefit the Black community, in motivating research participation and pursuit of GC/GT to lessen racial disparities in PCa. Individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and structural factors are both barriers and facilitators to awareness, interest, and uptake of GC/GT. Multilevel interventions such as communicating personal, familial, and community implications of GC/GT, improving patient-provider relationships and genetics education, and addressing systemic barriers are necessary to increase efficacy, utility, and equity in GC/GT.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-025-00785-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black individuals have the highest prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality rates of any racial or ethnic group. Racial disparities persist in the understanding and uptake of genetics services, while the perspectives of Black individuals with PCa regarding genetic counseling and germline genetic testing for inherited cancer risk (GC/GT) remains understudied. This qualitative study explored attitudes, facilitators, and barriers to awareness, interest, and uptake of GC/GT among Black individuals with PCa. Eight individuals who self-identified as African American and/or Black with a personal history of PCa participated in individual telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. Interview transcripts were analyzed using both an inductive and deductive coding approach, constant comparison, and selective coding. Five major themes were identified: (1) uncertainty surrounding personal relevance of GC/GT, (2) family influence and impact of GC/GT, (3) healthcare providers and institutions as gatekeepers of GC/GT, (4) community identity, influence, and impact of GC/GT, and (5) systemic barriers to GC/GT exemplify larger structural constraints. A key finding was the influence of community, a collective identity among Black individuals and a desire to benefit the Black community, in motivating research participation and pursuit of GC/GT to lessen racial disparities in PCa. Individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and structural factors are both barriers and facilitators to awareness, interest, and uptake of GC/GT. Multilevel interventions such as communicating personal, familial, and community implications of GC/GT, improving patient-provider relationships and genetics education, and addressing systemic barriers are necessary to increase efficacy, utility, and equity in GC/GT.

“希望有更好的机会”:对黑人前列腺癌患者的遗传咨询和检测的看法。
在所有种族或族裔群体中,黑人的前列腺癌发病率和死亡率最高。种族差异仍然存在于对遗传服务的理解和吸收中,而黑人PCa个体在遗传咨询和遗传癌症风险生殖系基因检测(GC/GT)方面的观点仍未得到充分研究。本定性研究探讨了黑人前列腺癌患者对GC/GT的认识、兴趣和吸收的态度、促进因素和障碍。8名自我认定为非裔美国人和/或黑人且有个人前列腺癌病史的人参加了使用半结构化访谈指南的个人电话访谈。访谈记录分析使用归纳和演绎编码方法,不断比较和选择性编码。确定了五个主要主题:(1)围绕GC/GT的个人相关性的不确定性;(2)GC/GT的家庭影响和影响;(3)医疗保健提供者和机构作为GC/GT的看门人;(4)社区认同、GC/GT的影响和影响;(5)GC/GT的系统性障碍是更大的结构性约束的例子。一个重要的发现是社区的影响,黑人个体的集体身份和造福黑人社区的愿望,在激励研究参与和追求GC/GT以减少PCa中的种族差异方面。个人、人际、制度、社区和结构因素都是意识、兴趣和采用GC/GT的障碍和促进因素。要提高GC/GT的疗效、效用和公平性,必须采取多层次干预措施,如沟通GC/GT对个人、家庭和社区的影响,改善医患关系和遗传学教育,并解决系统障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信