Risk of malignancy in indeterminate biliary tract strictures: Retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Joonas Sirén, Leena Kylänpää, Mia Rainio, Outi Lindström, Fredrik Åberg, Johanna Savikko, Arto Kokkola, Arno Nordin, Ville Sallinen
{"title":"Risk of malignancy in indeterminate biliary tract strictures: Retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Joonas Sirén, Leena Kylänpää, Mia Rainio, Outi Lindström, Fredrik Åberg, Johanna Savikko, Arto Kokkola, Arno Nordin, Ville Sallinen","doi":"10.1177/14574969251321966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indeterminate biliary strictures, that is, a stricture with benign brush cytology but without clear etiology in clinical or radiological assessment, pose a challenge for clinicians. This study aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors for malignant disease in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective study of patients with indeterminate biliary stricture undergoing first endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and biliary brushing between March 2011 and March 2020. The study included patients with atypical cytology in the first ERCP biliary brushing samples. Main exclusion criteria were primary sclerosing cholangitis, apparent malignancy or tumor in imaging studies, postoperative strictures, chronic pancreatitis, biliary tract stone, and no ≥12-month follow-up or a final pathological diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2279 patients underwent first ERCP procedure because of a biliary tract stricture during the study period, of which 51 patients (2.2%) had an indeterminate biliary stricture and were included. A total of 30 patients (58.8%) had final diagnosis of malignant disease. The patients with final diagnosis of malignant disease were mostly men (n = 19, 63.3%), had jaundice (n = 25, 86.2%), and had significantly higher bilirubin and CA19-9 values than those with benign disease. A total of 25 patients were operated on, of which 21 patients (84%) had malignant disease. Twenty-six patients were followed up only, of whom nine patients (34.6%) had a malignant disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Indeterminate biliary strictures are uncommon, but two-thirds of the initially indeterminate biliary strictures are malignant. The presence of clinical jaundice and elevated bilirubin and CA19-9 values are associated with increased risk of malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"14574969251321966"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969251321966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indeterminate biliary strictures, that is, a stricture with benign brush cytology but without clear etiology in clinical or radiological assessment, pose a challenge for clinicians. This study aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors for malignant disease in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures.

Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study of patients with indeterminate biliary stricture undergoing first endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and biliary brushing between March 2011 and March 2020. The study included patients with atypical cytology in the first ERCP biliary brushing samples. Main exclusion criteria were primary sclerosing cholangitis, apparent malignancy or tumor in imaging studies, postoperative strictures, chronic pancreatitis, biliary tract stone, and no ≥12-month follow-up or a final pathological diagnosis.

Results: A total of 2279 patients underwent first ERCP procedure because of a biliary tract stricture during the study period, of which 51 patients (2.2%) had an indeterminate biliary stricture and were included. A total of 30 patients (58.8%) had final diagnosis of malignant disease. The patients with final diagnosis of malignant disease were mostly men (n = 19, 63.3%), had jaundice (n = 25, 86.2%), and had significantly higher bilirubin and CA19-9 values than those with benign disease. A total of 25 patients were operated on, of which 21 patients (84%) had malignant disease. Twenty-six patients were followed up only, of whom nine patients (34.6%) had a malignant disease.

Conclusion: Indeterminate biliary strictures are uncommon, but two-thirds of the initially indeterminate biliary strictures are malignant. The presence of clinical jaundice and elevated bilirubin and CA19-9 values are associated with increased risk of malignancy.

不确定胆道狭窄的恶性肿瘤风险:回顾性队列研究。
背景:不确定性胆道狭窄,即刷状细胞学表现为良性,但在临床或影像学评估中没有明确病因的狭窄,给临床医生带来了挑战。本研究旨在评估不确定胆道狭窄患者恶性疾病的发生率和危险因素。方法:本研究是一项单中心回顾性研究,研究对象为2011年3月至2020年3月期间首次行内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)和胆道刷管的不确定胆道狭窄患者。该研究纳入了首次ERCP胆道刷检中细胞学不典型的患者。主要排除标准为原发性硬化性胆管炎、影像学检查有明显恶性或肿瘤、术后狭窄、慢性胰腺炎、胆道结石、无≥12个月随访或最终病理诊断。结果:在研究期间,共有2279例患者因胆道狭窄接受了首次ERCP手术,其中51例(2.2%)患者患有不确定的胆道狭窄。30例患者(58.8%)最终诊断为恶性疾病。最终诊断为恶性疾病的患者以男性居多(n = 19, 63.3%),有黄疸(n = 25, 86.2%),胆红素和CA19-9值明显高于良性疾病。共手术25例,其中恶性肿瘤21例(84%)。仅随访26例,其中9例(34.6%)为恶性肿瘤。结论:不确定性胆道狭窄并不常见,但三分之二的初始不确定性胆道狭窄为恶性。临床黄疸、胆红素和CA19-9值升高与恶性肿瘤风险增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信