Arthroscopic Pectoralis Minor Release and Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Decompression for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Novel Treatment for an Old Problem.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2025-03-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00203
Eric R Wagner, Thomas J McQuillan, Oluwakorede Omole, Sameer R Khawaja, Kevin R Cuneo, Zaamin B Hussain, Hayden L Cooke, Krishna N Chopra, Michael B Gottschalk, Robert L Bowers
{"title":"Arthroscopic Pectoralis Minor Release and Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Decompression for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Novel Treatment for an Old Problem.","authors":"Eric R Wagner, Thomas J McQuillan, Oluwakorede Omole, Sameer R Khawaja, Kevin R Cuneo, Zaamin B Hussain, Hayden L Cooke, Krishna N Chopra, Michael B Gottschalk, Robert L Bowers","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) of infraclavicular etiology is a complex condition involving the compression of the brachial plexus through the interscalene triangle and costoclavicular, infraclavicular, and pectoralis minor space. New insight into nTOS of infraclavicular etiology and its association with scapular dyskinesia has enabled minimally invasive treatments: endoscopic pectoralis minor release (PMR) and infraclavicular brachial plexus neurolysis. The purpose of this study was to analyze clinical outcomes of this technique compared with historically published outcomes for open first rib resection (FRR) and/or scalenectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent endoscopic surgical decompression for nTOS of infraclavicular etiology were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. Surgical treatment included endoscopic PMR, subclavius release, and neurolysis of the infraclavicular brachial plexus. Patient-reported outcomes were collected prospectively and compared with prior research on FRR and scalenectomy. A subgroup analysis was performed on patients with prior open FRR or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight shoulders among 55 patients were included, with an average follow-up of 25.8 months (range: 12-52). Patients showed significant improvement in visual analog scale pain (7.0-2.1) and single alpha-numeric evaluation scores (37% to 84%). Overall, 90% of patients experienced good or excellent outcomes according to the Derkash classification. There were no major complications and only 2 minor ones (one wound infection and one case of adhesive capsulitis). Satisfaction and Derkash scores among patients undergoing endoscopic surgery were comparable with previously published studies on open FRR and scalenectomy, with lower rates of major complications and equivalent or improved clinical outcomes. Patients with prior ACDF or open FRR had worse postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; and Derkash scores than the subgroup with no prior intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic PMR and infraclavicular brachial plexus decompression is a viable and effective treatment option for nTOS of infraclavicular etiology driven by the pectoralis minor and associated scapular girdle dyskinesia. This cohort demonstrates improvements in clinical outcomes comparable with open scalenectomy and FRR with high patient satisfaction and no major neurologic, vascular, or thoracic complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV-Case Series. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11896109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) of infraclavicular etiology is a complex condition involving the compression of the brachial plexus through the interscalene triangle and costoclavicular, infraclavicular, and pectoralis minor space. New insight into nTOS of infraclavicular etiology and its association with scapular dyskinesia has enabled minimally invasive treatments: endoscopic pectoralis minor release (PMR) and infraclavicular brachial plexus neurolysis. The purpose of this study was to analyze clinical outcomes of this technique compared with historically published outcomes for open first rib resection (FRR) and/or scalenectomy.

Methods: All patients who underwent endoscopic surgical decompression for nTOS of infraclavicular etiology were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. Surgical treatment included endoscopic PMR, subclavius release, and neurolysis of the infraclavicular brachial plexus. Patient-reported outcomes were collected prospectively and compared with prior research on FRR and scalenectomy. A subgroup analysis was performed on patients with prior open FRR or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Results: Fifty-eight shoulders among 55 patients were included, with an average follow-up of 25.8 months (range: 12-52). Patients showed significant improvement in visual analog scale pain (7.0-2.1) and single alpha-numeric evaluation scores (37% to 84%). Overall, 90% of patients experienced good or excellent outcomes according to the Derkash classification. There were no major complications and only 2 minor ones (one wound infection and one case of adhesive capsulitis). Satisfaction and Derkash scores among patients undergoing endoscopic surgery were comparable with previously published studies on open FRR and scalenectomy, with lower rates of major complications and equivalent or improved clinical outcomes. Patients with prior ACDF or open FRR had worse postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; and Derkash scores than the subgroup with no prior intervention.

Conclusions: Endoscopic PMR and infraclavicular brachial plexus decompression is a viable and effective treatment option for nTOS of infraclavicular etiology driven by the pectoralis minor and associated scapular girdle dyskinesia. This cohort demonstrates improvements in clinical outcomes comparable with open scalenectomy and FRR with high patient satisfaction and no major neurologic, vascular, or thoracic complications.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV-Case Series. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

关节镜下胸小肌松解和锁骨下臂丛减压治疗神经源性胸廓出口综合征:一个老问题的新治疗方法。
背景:锁骨下神经源性胸廓出口综合征(nTOS)是一种复杂的疾病,涉及通过斜肌间三角、肋锁骨、锁骨下和胸小肌间隙压迫臂丛。锁骨下nTOS病因及其与肩胛骨运动障碍的关系的新见解使微创治疗成为可能:内镜下胸小肌松解(PMR)和锁骨下臂丛神经松解。本研究的目的是将该技术的临床结果与历史上发表的开放式第一肋骨切除术(FRR)和/或斜角切除术的结果进行比较。方法:回顾性分析同一医院所有因锁骨下病因性nTOS接受内窥镜手术减压的患者。手术治疗包括内镜下PMR,锁骨下松解和锁骨下臂丛神经松解。前瞻性地收集患者报告的结果,并比较先前关于FRR和斜角切除术的研究。对既往开放性FRR或前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合(ACDF)患者进行亚组分析。结果:55例患者入组58例肩关节,平均随访25.8个月(范围:12-52)。患者的视觉模拟疼痛评分(7.0-2.1)和单一字母数字评估评分(37%至84%)均有显著改善。总体而言,根据Derkash分类,90%的患者获得了良好或极好的结果。无重大并发症,仅有2例轻微并发症(伤口感染1例,粘连性囊炎1例)。内窥镜手术患者的满意度和Derkash评分与先前发表的开放式FRR和斜角切除术的研究相当,主要并发症发生率较低,临床结果相当或改善。既往ACDF或开放性FRR患者术后美国肩肘外科医生更差;手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾;和Derkash评分高于未进行干预的亚组。结论:内镜下PMR联合锁骨下臂丛减压术是治疗由胸小肌及肩胛骨带运动障碍引起的锁骨下综合征的一种可行且有效的方法。该队列显示,与开放式斜角切除术和FRR相比,临床结果有所改善,患者满意度高,无主要神经、血管或胸部并发症。证据级别:治疗性iv级病例系列。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信