Is the annual hospital volume associated with recurrence and chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) syndrome after inguinal hernia repair in laparo-endoscopic or open mesh technique (Lichtenstein)?

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Reinhard Bittner, Solveig Unger, Ferdinand Köckerling, Daniela Adolf
{"title":"Is the annual hospital volume associated with recurrence and chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) syndrome after inguinal hernia repair in laparo-endoscopic or open mesh technique (Lichtenstein)?","authors":"Reinhard Bittner, Solveig Unger, Ferdinand Köckerling, Daniela Adolf","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11619-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In major surgery, several studies have shown a correlation between high annual hospital volume (hospital caseload) and better outcome. Therefore, centralization is recommended. However, in inguinal hernia surgery the data are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is based on a retrospective analysis of prospective data from the German Herniamed Registry collected between 2009 and 2018. Out of the total of 731,982 patients operated on in 737 institutions, patients who had undergone inguinal hernia repair in Lichtenstein or in laparo-endoscopic (TAPP/TEP) technique were included. Hospitals were divided into three annual caseload categories: Low volume: ≤ 75 cases; middle volume: 76-199 cases; high volume: ≥ 200 cases. The relationship between hospital volume and the outcome parameters was analyzed using multivariable binary logistic models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>222,487 patients were enrolled in analysis, with 70.4% hernias operated on in laparo-endoscopic technique and 29.6% cases in open mesh technique. Overall, the outcome after laparo-endoscopic repair was significantly favorable except for the intraoperative complications (worse) and recurrence rate (no significant difference). Descriptive and multivariable analysis identified a long operating time as the main factor associated with an unfavorable outcome. In low-volume hospitals the risk was higher for intraoperative complications as well as for postoperative complications in both techniques. There was a significantly favorable association between the recurrence rate and hospital volume but only after laparo-endoscopic repair. Patients who were operated on in a low-volume center experienced significantly less pain across all three pain categories, independently of the technique used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While hospital volume has a favorable association with most outcome parameters, this varied in accordance with the operative technique used. In contrast to open surgery, laparo-endoscopic surgery in a low-volume hospital (≤ 75) has the disadvantage of a higher recurrence rate. Long operating time is the most detrimental factor, proving that surgeon proficiency is of paramount importance. However, chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) syndrome is significantly less frequent in patients operated on in low-volume hospitals; this result is difficult to explain but may be due to a closer patient-surgeon relationship in these institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"2882-2901"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11619-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In major surgery, several studies have shown a correlation between high annual hospital volume (hospital caseload) and better outcome. Therefore, centralization is recommended. However, in inguinal hernia surgery the data are limited.

Methods: The study is based on a retrospective analysis of prospective data from the German Herniamed Registry collected between 2009 and 2018. Out of the total of 731,982 patients operated on in 737 institutions, patients who had undergone inguinal hernia repair in Lichtenstein or in laparo-endoscopic (TAPP/TEP) technique were included. Hospitals were divided into three annual caseload categories: Low volume: ≤ 75 cases; middle volume: 76-199 cases; high volume: ≥ 200 cases. The relationship between hospital volume and the outcome parameters was analyzed using multivariable binary logistic models.

Results: 222,487 patients were enrolled in analysis, with 70.4% hernias operated on in laparo-endoscopic technique and 29.6% cases in open mesh technique. Overall, the outcome after laparo-endoscopic repair was significantly favorable except for the intraoperative complications (worse) and recurrence rate (no significant difference). Descriptive and multivariable analysis identified a long operating time as the main factor associated with an unfavorable outcome. In low-volume hospitals the risk was higher for intraoperative complications as well as for postoperative complications in both techniques. There was a significantly favorable association between the recurrence rate and hospital volume but only after laparo-endoscopic repair. Patients who were operated on in a low-volume center experienced significantly less pain across all three pain categories, independently of the technique used.

Conclusions: While hospital volume has a favorable association with most outcome parameters, this varied in accordance with the operative technique used. In contrast to open surgery, laparo-endoscopic surgery in a low-volume hospital (≤ 75) has the disadvantage of a higher recurrence rate. Long operating time is the most detrimental factor, proving that surgeon proficiency is of paramount importance. However, chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) syndrome is significantly less frequent in patients operated on in low-volume hospitals; this result is difficult to explain but may be due to a closer patient-surgeon relationship in these institutions.

腹腔镜或开放式网片技术(Lichtenstein)腹股沟疝修补术后,年住院量与复发和术后腹股沟慢性疼痛(CPIP)综合征是否相关?
背景:在大外科手术中,一些研究表明高年度住院量(医院病例量)与更好的预后之间存在相关性。因此,建议使用集中化。然而,在腹股沟疝手术中,数据有限。方法:该研究基于对2009年至2018年收集的德国疝气登记的前瞻性数据的回顾性分析。在737家机构共731,982例手术患者中,包括在Lichtenstein或腹腔镜-内镜(TAPP/TEP)技术下进行腹股沟疝修补的患者。医院按年病例量分为三类:低业务量:≤75例;中卷:76-199例;高容量:≥200例。采用多变量二元logistic模型分析医院容量与结局参数的关系。结果:纳入分析的222487例患者中,70.4%的疝采用腹腔镜内镜手术,29.6%的疝采用开放补片技术。总的来说,除了术中并发症(较差)和复发率(无显著差异)外,腹腔镜内镜修复后的结果明显有利。描述性和多变量分析表明,较长的操作时间是与不利结果相关的主要因素。在小容量的医院中,两种技术的术中并发症和术后并发症的风险更高。复发率与医院容量之间有显著的有利关系,但仅在腹腔镜内镜修复后。在小容量中心进行手术的患者在所有三种疼痛类别中都明显减轻了疼痛,与使用的技术无关。结论:虽然医院容量与大多数预后参数有良好的关联,但这取决于所使用的手术技术。与开放手术相比,小容量医院(≤75)的腹腔镜内镜手术具有复发率较高的缺点。手术时间长是最不利的因素,证明外科医生的熟练程度至关重要。然而,慢性术后腹股沟疼痛(CPIP)综合征在小容量医院手术的患者中发生率明显较低;这一结果很难解释,但可能是由于这些机构的医患关系更密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信