MET to Levator Scapulae Versus MET to Anterior Scalene: Comparative Effects on Craniovertebral Angle and Cervical Joint Position in Forward Head Posture.

Q2 Health Professions
Neha Kulkarni, Riddhi Bhandari, Shruti Soni, Tushar J Palekar
{"title":"MET to Levator Scapulae Versus MET to Anterior Scalene: Comparative Effects on Craniovertebral Angle and Cervical Joint Position in Forward Head Posture.","authors":"Neha Kulkarni, Riddhi Bhandari, Shruti Soni, Tushar J Palekar","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v18i1.1075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Forward head posture (FHP) results in an accentuated posterior curve in the higher thoracic vertebrae and an accentuated anterior curve in the lower cervical vertebrae. Dysfunction leads to muscle imbalance, where one side of the neck and scapula muscles become weak and the opposite group of muscles become tight. Strategies to correct this imbalance by treating flexibility and improving strength are the need of the hour.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of muscle energy technique (MET) to levator scapulae versus MET to anterior scalene in improving craniovertebral angle (CVA) and joint position sense.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted at the outpatient department of Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Pune, India.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Both males and females aged between 18 and 30 years with a CVA <48° were included.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This was an experimental study.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A comparative experimental study was done on subjects aged between 18 and 30 years with CVA<48°. Group A (n = 15) received MET to levator scapulae muscles with conventional treatment and group B (n = 15) received MET to anterior scalene muscles with conventional treatment for 4 weeks, three sessions per week. The outcome measures assessed were CVA and cervical joint position error, pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>CVA and cervical joint position sense.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MET to levator scapulae and anterior scalene significantly improved the FHP (p = 0.001 for both the groups) and cervical proprioception (p = 0.001 for both the groups) using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for pre-post comparison. However, on comparison between groups using the Mann-Whitney U test, MET to levator scapulae was better in improving the FHP (p = 0.002). No significant difference was found in the cervical joint position sense between both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Levator scapulae and anterior scalene flexibility should also be considered in FHP. Applying MET to these two muscles is not only beneficial in realigning the FHP but also in improving the cervical joint position sense.</p>","PeriodicalId":39090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v18i1.1075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Forward head posture (FHP) results in an accentuated posterior curve in the higher thoracic vertebrae and an accentuated anterior curve in the lower cervical vertebrae. Dysfunction leads to muscle imbalance, where one side of the neck and scapula muscles become weak and the opposite group of muscles become tight. Strategies to correct this imbalance by treating flexibility and improving strength are the need of the hour.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of muscle energy technique (MET) to levator scapulae versus MET to anterior scalene in improving craniovertebral angle (CVA) and joint position sense.

Setting: This study was conducted at the outpatient department of Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Pune, India.

Participants: Both males and females aged between 18 and 30 years with a CVA <48° were included.

Research design: This was an experimental study.

Intervention: A comparative experimental study was done on subjects aged between 18 and 30 years with CVA<48°. Group A (n = 15) received MET to levator scapulae muscles with conventional treatment and group B (n = 15) received MET to anterior scalene muscles with conventional treatment for 4 weeks, three sessions per week. The outcome measures assessed were CVA and cervical joint position error, pre- and post-intervention.

Main outcome measures: CVA and cervical joint position sense.

Results: MET to levator scapulae and anterior scalene significantly improved the FHP (p = 0.001 for both the groups) and cervical proprioception (p = 0.001 for both the groups) using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for pre-post comparison. However, on comparison between groups using the Mann-Whitney U test, MET to levator scapulae was better in improving the FHP (p = 0.002). No significant difference was found in the cervical joint position sense between both the groups.

Conclusion: Levator scapulae and anterior scalene flexibility should also be considered in FHP. Applying MET to these two muscles is not only beneficial in realigning the FHP but also in improving the cervical joint position sense.

肩胛提肌与前斜角肌:头部前倾时颅椎角和颈椎关节位置的比较影响。
背景:前倾头位(FHP)会导致较高胸椎的后弯加重和较低颈椎的前弯加重。功能障碍导致肌肉不平衡,其中一侧的颈部和肩胛骨肌肉变弱,而另一侧的肌肉变紧。现在需要通过治疗柔韧性和提高力量来纠正这种不平衡的策略。目的:本研究的目的是评估肌能技术(MET)肩胛提肌与MET前斜角肌在改善颅椎角(CVA)和关节位置感觉方面的有效性。背景:本研究在印度浦那Dr. D. Y. Patil物理治疗学院门诊部进行。参与者:年龄在18至30岁之间的男性和女性,CVA研究设计:这是一项实验性研究。干预:对年龄在18 - 30岁的受试者进行CVAMain结局测量:CVA和颈椎关节位置感的比较实验研究。结果:使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行前后比较,MET对肩胛提肌和前斜角肌显著改善FHP(两组均p = 0.001)和颈椎本体感觉(两组均p = 0.001)。然而,在Mann-Whitney U检验的组间比较中,MET提升肩胛骨对FHP的改善效果更好(p = 0.002)。两组间颈椎关节位置感差异无统计学意义。结论:FHP还应考虑肩胛提肌和前斜角肌的灵活性。在这两块肌肉上应用MET不仅有利于调整FHP,而且可以改善颈椎关节的位置感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJTMB is a peer-reviewed journal focusing on the research (methodological, physiological, and clinical) and professional development of therapeutic massage and bodywork and its providers, encompassing all allied health providers whose services include manually applied therapeutic massage and bodywork. The Journal provides a professional forum for editorial input; scientifically-based articles of a research, educational, and practice-oriented nature; readers’ commentaries on journal content and related professional matters; and pertinent news and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信