Nanoparticle contrast-enhanced computed tomography of sporadic aortic aneurysm and dissection: Effect of nanoparticle size and contrast agent dose.

IF 12.4 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Theranostics Pub Date : 2025-02-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/thno.109325
Laxman Devkota, Chen Zhang, Deborah Vela, Poonam Sarkar, Prajwal Bhandari, Zbigniew Starosolski, Renuka Menon, Dianna M Milewicz, Ying H Shen, Scott A LeMaire, Ketan B Ghaghada
{"title":"Nanoparticle contrast-enhanced computed tomography of sporadic aortic aneurysm and dissection: Effect of nanoparticle size and contrast agent dose.","authors":"Laxman Devkota, Chen Zhang, Deborah Vela, Poonam Sarkar, Prajwal Bhandari, Zbigniew Starosolski, Renuka Menon, Dianna M Milewicz, Ying H Shen, Scott A LeMaire, Ketan B Ghaghada","doi":"10.7150/thno.109325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Aortopathies, such as aortic aneurysm and dissection (AAD), are associated with enhanced aortic wall permeability and endothelial dysfunction. We previously demonstrated that nanoparticle contrast-enhanced computed tomography (nCECT), which detects enhanced aortic wall permeability, could enable non-invasive detection of early AAD before its progresses to fatal aortic rupture. This study investigated the effect of nanoparticle contrast agent (NPCA) size and dose on detection of aortopathy by nCECT. <b>Methods:</b> <i>In vivo</i> studies were performed in a mouse model of sporadic AAD induced by challenging animals with high fat diet (5 weeks) and angiotensin II infusion (last one week). The effects of NPCA size (80, 150, and 240 nm) and NPCA dose (300, 600, and 1200 mg I/kg) on detection of aortopathy were studied. To examine temporal changes in aortic wall NPCA signal at sites of AAD, mice underwent longitudinal CT. To investigate changes in aortic wall integrity, mice underwent follow-up nCECT at 6 months after initial challenge. Imaging findings were compared with gross and histologic examination of the aorta. Fluorescence microscopy was used to confirm presence or absence of intramural NPCA. <b>Results</b>: nCECT using all three sizes of NPCAs demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (p< 0.05) for the detection of aortopathy compared to gross examination. Histologic analysis showed excellent correlation between the nCECT finding of intramural signal and the presence of aortopathy. The absolute improvements in detection rates were 16%, 20%, and 17% for 80 nm, 150 nm, 250 nm NPCA respectively. Sensitivity of nCECT for detection of aortic injury improved with increasing NPCA dose compared to gross exam (-17% at 300 mg I/kg to 14% at 1200 mg I/kg). Temporal analysis of aortic wall NPCA signal at sites of AAD demonstrated a peak in aortic wall CT attenuation at day 3-5 post-contrast followed by gradual return to baseline by day 120. Follow-up nCECT at 6 months demonstrated absence of wall signal enhancement compared to baseline, suggesting resolution of the altered aortic wall permeability and injury. Histologic analysis demonstrated remodeling and healing of the aortic wall. <b>Conclusions</b>: Nanoparticle contrast-enhanced CT using all three studied nanoparticle sizes demonstrated higher sensitivity than gross examination for the detection of aortopathy. A dose-dependent effect on sensitivity was observed with only high NPCA dose (1200 mg I/kg) demonstrating superior performance compared to gross examination for detecting early stages of aortic injury. Nanoparticle contrast-enhanced CT enabled <i>in vivo</i> interrogation of changes in aortic wall integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22932,"journal":{"name":"Theranostics","volume":"15 8","pages":"3462-3473"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theranostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.109325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aortopathies, such as aortic aneurysm and dissection (AAD), are associated with enhanced aortic wall permeability and endothelial dysfunction. We previously demonstrated that nanoparticle contrast-enhanced computed tomography (nCECT), which detects enhanced aortic wall permeability, could enable non-invasive detection of early AAD before its progresses to fatal aortic rupture. This study investigated the effect of nanoparticle contrast agent (NPCA) size and dose on detection of aortopathy by nCECT. Methods: In vivo studies were performed in a mouse model of sporadic AAD induced by challenging animals with high fat diet (5 weeks) and angiotensin II infusion (last one week). The effects of NPCA size (80, 150, and 240 nm) and NPCA dose (300, 600, and 1200 mg I/kg) on detection of aortopathy were studied. To examine temporal changes in aortic wall NPCA signal at sites of AAD, mice underwent longitudinal CT. To investigate changes in aortic wall integrity, mice underwent follow-up nCECT at 6 months after initial challenge. Imaging findings were compared with gross and histologic examination of the aorta. Fluorescence microscopy was used to confirm presence or absence of intramural NPCA. Results: nCECT using all three sizes of NPCAs demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (p< 0.05) for the detection of aortopathy compared to gross examination. Histologic analysis showed excellent correlation between the nCECT finding of intramural signal and the presence of aortopathy. The absolute improvements in detection rates were 16%, 20%, and 17% for 80 nm, 150 nm, 250 nm NPCA respectively. Sensitivity of nCECT for detection of aortic injury improved with increasing NPCA dose compared to gross exam (-17% at 300 mg I/kg to 14% at 1200 mg I/kg). Temporal analysis of aortic wall NPCA signal at sites of AAD demonstrated a peak in aortic wall CT attenuation at day 3-5 post-contrast followed by gradual return to baseline by day 120. Follow-up nCECT at 6 months demonstrated absence of wall signal enhancement compared to baseline, suggesting resolution of the altered aortic wall permeability and injury. Histologic analysis demonstrated remodeling and healing of the aortic wall. Conclusions: Nanoparticle contrast-enhanced CT using all three studied nanoparticle sizes demonstrated higher sensitivity than gross examination for the detection of aortopathy. A dose-dependent effect on sensitivity was observed with only high NPCA dose (1200 mg I/kg) demonstrating superior performance compared to gross examination for detecting early stages of aortic injury. Nanoparticle contrast-enhanced CT enabled in vivo interrogation of changes in aortic wall integrity.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theranostics
Theranostics MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
25.40
自引率
1.60%
发文量
433
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Theranostics serves as a pivotal platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific insights within the diagnostic and therapeutic molecular and nanomedicine community, along with allied professions engaged in integrating molecular imaging and therapy. As a multidisciplinary journal, Theranostics showcases innovative research articles spanning fields such as in vitro diagnostics and prognostics, in vivo molecular imaging, molecular therapeutics, image-guided therapy, biosensor technology, nanobiosensors, bioelectronics, system biology, translational medicine, point-of-care applications, and personalized medicine. Encouraging a broad spectrum of biomedical research with potential theranostic applications, the journal rigorously peer-reviews primary research, alongside publishing reviews, news, and commentary that aim to bridge the gap between the laboratory, clinic, and biotechnology industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信