Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Long-Term Follow-up Study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-14 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241313474
Cristina Delgado, Elena Calvo, Maria Valencia, Natalia Martínez-Catalán, Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso, Emilio Calvo
{"title":"Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Long-Term Follow-up Study.","authors":"Cristina Delgado, Elena Calvo, Maria Valencia, Natalia Martínez-Catalán, Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso, Emilio Calvo","doi":"10.1177/23259671241313474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Bankart and the Latarjet procedures are 2 of the most commonly utilized surgical techniques to treat anterior shoulder instability. However, the long-term outcomes after these procedures remain unclear, and there is not enough information regarding arthroscopic Latarjet.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze long-term outcomes of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability managed with an arthroscopic Bankart or Latarjet procedure.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent an arthroscopic Latarjet were matched-paired in a 1:1 ratio with patients who underwent an arthroscopic Bankart procedure at a single institution between 2007 and 2012. Recurrence at the time of follow-up as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Postoperative status was assessed at the final follow-up using the Rowe score, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), the Subjective Shoulder Value, and the return-to-sport rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 patients, 40 patients in each group, were included (overall mean age, 26.5 ± 15.4 years). The mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range, 10-17 years). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the Bankart group compared with the Latarjet group (35% vs 10%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .009). The mean estimate for the cumulative proportion of stable shoulders at 15-year follow-up was 64.4% in the Bankart group and 89.6% in the Latarjet group (<i>P</i> = .008). Revision surgery because of instability was necessary in 8 (20%) patients in the Bankart group and 2 (5%) in the Latarjet group (<i>P</i> = .41). There was no significant group difference in complication rate (15% in the Bankart group vs 17.5% in the Latarjet group; <i>P</i> = .48). The WOSI score was significantly better in patients treated with arthroscopic Latarjet (<i>P</i> = .004). More than half of the patients were able to completely return to their previous sport (52.5%), with no significant difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arthroscopic Latarjet was associated with a significantly lower recurrence rate and better postoperative WOSI score and sports activity level at long-term follow-up compared with arthroscopic Bankart, without any greater risk of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 3","pages":"23259671241313474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241313474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Bankart and the Latarjet procedures are 2 of the most commonly utilized surgical techniques to treat anterior shoulder instability. However, the long-term outcomes after these procedures remain unclear, and there is not enough information regarding arthroscopic Latarjet.

Purpose: To analyze long-term outcomes of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability managed with an arthroscopic Bankart or Latarjet procedure.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Patients who underwent an arthroscopic Latarjet were matched-paired in a 1:1 ratio with patients who underwent an arthroscopic Bankart procedure at a single institution between 2007 and 2012. Recurrence at the time of follow-up as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Postoperative status was assessed at the final follow-up using the Rowe score, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), the Subjective Shoulder Value, and the return-to-sport rate.

Results: A total of 80 patients, 40 patients in each group, were included (overall mean age, 26.5 ± 15.4 years). The mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range, 10-17 years). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the Bankart group compared with the Latarjet group (35% vs 10%, respectively; P = .009). The mean estimate for the cumulative proportion of stable shoulders at 15-year follow-up was 64.4% in the Bankart group and 89.6% in the Latarjet group (P = .008). Revision surgery because of instability was necessary in 8 (20%) patients in the Bankart group and 2 (5%) in the Latarjet group (P = .41). There was no significant group difference in complication rate (15% in the Bankart group vs 17.5% in the Latarjet group; P = .48). The WOSI score was significantly better in patients treated with arthroscopic Latarjet (P = .004). More than half of the patients were able to completely return to their previous sport (52.5%), with no significant difference between groups.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic Latarjet was associated with a significantly lower recurrence rate and better postoperative WOSI score and sports activity level at long-term follow-up compared with arthroscopic Bankart, without any greater risk of complications.

关节镜下 Bankart 修复术与关节镜下 Latarjet 术治疗肩关节前方失稳:配对长期随访研究
背景:Bankart和Latarjet手术是治疗肩关节前路不稳最常用的两种手术技术。然而,这些手术后的长期结果尚不清楚,关于关节镜下Latarjet的信息也不够。目的:分析关节镜下Bankart或Latarjet手术治疗肱骨前关节不稳患者的长期预后。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:2007年至2012年间,在同一家机构接受Latarjet关节镜手术的患者与接受Bankart关节镜手术的患者按1:1的比例配对。记录两组患者随访时的复发率及术中、术后并发症发生情况并进行比较。在最后随访时,使用Rowe评分、西安大略肩部不稳定指数(WOSI)、主观肩部值和恢复运动率评估术后状态。结果:共纳入80例患者,每组40例,总平均年龄26.5±15.4岁。平均随访时间为13.2年(10-17年)。Bankart组复发率明显高于Latarjet组(分别为35% vs 10%;P = .009)。在Bankart组和Latarjet组中,15年随访时稳定肩关节累积比例的平均估计值分别为64.4%和89.6% (P = 0.008)。Bankart组8例(20%)患者和Latarjet组2例(5%)患者因不稳定需要进行翻修手术(P = 0.41)。并发症发生率组间无显著差异(Bankart组为15%,Latarjet组为17.5%;P = .48)。关节镜下Latarjet治疗的患者WOSI评分明显更好(P = 0.004)。超过一半的患者能够完全恢复到以前的运动(52.5%),组间无显著差异。结论:与关节镜下Bankart相比,关节镜下Latarjet的复发率明显降低,术后WOSI评分和长期随访运动水平更好,且无更大的并发症风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信