Assessment of Candidates' Performance Pre- and Post-Adoption of Standard Setting in College Examinations between 2016 and 2023.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.4103/npmj.npmj_180_24
Titilope Oyinlola Charles-Eromosele, Oyenike Oyeronke Ekekezie, Patrick Ayodeji Akinyemi, Fatiu Abiola Arogundade
{"title":"Assessment of Candidates' Performance Pre- and Post-Adoption of Standard Setting in College Examinations between 2016 and 2023.","authors":"Titilope Oyinlola Charles-Eromosele, Oyenike Oyeronke Ekekezie, Patrick Ayodeji Akinyemi, Fatiu Abiola Arogundade","doi":"10.4103/npmj.npmj_180_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment drives candidates' learning and focuses on the main goals and objectives of the course. Over the years, determination of pass scores in medical education has evolved from the arbitrary 50% to the actual determination of the cut-off scores in the standard setting process in order to make a decision to pass/fail candidates presenting for licensure or credentialing purposes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study aimed at assessing and comparing candidates' performance pre- and post-adoption of standard setting in the college. This was a comparative cross-sectional study with a time trend. Examination results of all candidates who registered and sat for examinations in the years 2016-2023 were included in the study. Secondary data from approved results of the various faculties from 2016 to 2023 were used. Data analysis was done using SPSS Version 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference in the mean pass rates pre- and post-adoption of standard setting in the primary examinations (P < 0.001), Part I examinations (P = 0.002) and Part II examinations (P < 0.001) with a higher mean pass rate post-adoption of standard setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increased pass rates in the primary, Part I and Part II examinations post-adoption of standard setting may suggest improved examination performance. There is, however, the need to assess the acquired competencies and skills of the candidates post-certification. The significantly higher mean pass rates post-adoption of standard setting are consequent on improvement in the quality and robustness of items/questions and of the examination processes, brought about by the training and retraining of faculty examiners which preceded the implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19720,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_180_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessment drives candidates' learning and focuses on the main goals and objectives of the course. Over the years, determination of pass scores in medical education has evolved from the arbitrary 50% to the actual determination of the cut-off scores in the standard setting process in order to make a decision to pass/fail candidates presenting for licensure or credentialing purposes.

Materials and methods: The study aimed at assessing and comparing candidates' performance pre- and post-adoption of standard setting in the college. This was a comparative cross-sectional study with a time trend. Examination results of all candidates who registered and sat for examinations in the years 2016-2023 were included in the study. Secondary data from approved results of the various faculties from 2016 to 2023 were used. Data analysis was done using SPSS Version 26.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the mean pass rates pre- and post-adoption of standard setting in the primary examinations (P < 0.001), Part I examinations (P = 0.002) and Part II examinations (P < 0.001) with a higher mean pass rate post-adoption of standard setting.

Conclusion: The increased pass rates in the primary, Part I and Part II examinations post-adoption of standard setting may suggest improved examination performance. There is, however, the need to assess the acquired competencies and skills of the candidates post-certification. The significantly higher mean pass rates post-adoption of standard setting are consequent on improvement in the quality and robustness of items/questions and of the examination processes, brought about by the training and retraining of faculty examiners which preceded the implementation.

2016年至2023年大学考试采用标准设定前后考生表现评估
背景:评估推动考生的学习,并关注课程的主要目标和目的。多年来,医学教育的及格分数的确定已经从任意的50%发展到在标准制定过程中实际确定截止分数,以便决定通过/不通过的候选人提交执照或资格证书。材料与方法:本研究旨在评估和比较采用标准设置前后考生的表现。这是一项具有时间趋势的比较横断面研究。所有在2016-2023年注册并参加考试的考生的考试成绩都被纳入研究。使用了2016年至2023年各院系批准结果的二手数据。使用SPSS Version 26进行数据分析。结果:采用标准前后的初级考试、第一部分考试(P = 0.002)和第二部分考试(P < 0.001)的平均通过率差异有统计学意义,采用标准后的平均通过率更高。结论:采用标准设置后,小学、一、二级考试通过率的提高可能表明考试成绩的提高。但是,有必要在认证后评估候选人获得的能力和技能。采用标准后的平均通过率显著提高,是因为在采用标准之前对教员审查员进行培训和再培训,提高了项目/问题和考试过程的质量和稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信