Determination of the Common Microorganisms Present in the Intensive Care Unit of Federal Teaching Hospital Owerri, Southeast Nigeria: A Prospective, Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.4103/npmj.npmj_245_24
Iheanyi Ihunanya Anokwute, Regina Ugochi Onwudiwe, Ebe Kalu, Chukwuma Grant Madubuko, Chinyere Theresa Egbulem, Edwin Chinaka Eluchie
{"title":"Determination of the Common Microorganisms Present in the Intensive Care Unit of Federal Teaching Hospital Owerri, Southeast Nigeria: A Prospective, Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Iheanyi Ihunanya Anokwute, Regina Ugochi Onwudiwe, Ebe Kalu, Chukwuma Grant Madubuko, Chinyere Theresa Egbulem, Edwin Chinaka Eluchie","doi":"10.4103/npmj.npmj_245_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bacterial contamination of inanimate surfaces in the intensive care unit (ICU) and subsequent cross-transmission of the microorganisms may play a significant role in ICU-acquired infections.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the common organisms in the ICU and their sensitivity profile.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institution's Health Research and Ethics Committee. Sampling involved all the equipment and furniture with which the health workers and patients have greater contact within the ICU and also the air. Sample collection was done using the open plate method for air and the swab method for the surfaces of equipment and furniture. Microbial growths were isolated using the standard bacteriological methods such as lactose fermentation and gram stain while antibiotic sensitivity was achieved with the disc diffusion method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 66 samples were collected and 36 (54.5%) yielded microbial growth, 4 (11.1%) were by open plate method, and 32 (88.9%) by swab method. 27 (61.4%) of the isolates were Gram-negative organisms while 9 (20.5%) were Gram-positive organisms. Escherichia coli was the most dominant isolate 26 (59.1%) followed by Staphylococcus spp. 9 (20.5%), fungi 8 (18.2%), and Klebsiella spp. 1 (2.3%). All the isolates were sensitive to ceftriaxone/sulbactam and ofloxacin, but they were resistant to augmentin, cefixime, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, erythromycin, azithromycin, and gentamycin. However, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and imipenem were effective with all the isolates except Klebsiella.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bacteria contamination rate in the ICU was relatively high, mostly by Gram-negative organisms. Frequent profiling and sensitivity testing of the microbial load in the ICU are advocated to guide treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19720,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_245_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bacterial contamination of inanimate surfaces in the intensive care unit (ICU) and subsequent cross-transmission of the microorganisms may play a significant role in ICU-acquired infections.

Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the common organisms in the ICU and their sensitivity profile.

Subjects and methods: Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institution's Health Research and Ethics Committee. Sampling involved all the equipment and furniture with which the health workers and patients have greater contact within the ICU and also the air. Sample collection was done using the open plate method for air and the swab method for the surfaces of equipment and furniture. Microbial growths were isolated using the standard bacteriological methods such as lactose fermentation and gram stain while antibiotic sensitivity was achieved with the disc diffusion method.

Results: A total of 66 samples were collected and 36 (54.5%) yielded microbial growth, 4 (11.1%) were by open plate method, and 32 (88.9%) by swab method. 27 (61.4%) of the isolates were Gram-negative organisms while 9 (20.5%) were Gram-positive organisms. Escherichia coli was the most dominant isolate 26 (59.1%) followed by Staphylococcus spp. 9 (20.5%), fungi 8 (18.2%), and Klebsiella spp. 1 (2.3%). All the isolates were sensitive to ceftriaxone/sulbactam and ofloxacin, but they were resistant to augmentin, cefixime, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, erythromycin, azithromycin, and gentamycin. However, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and imipenem were effective with all the isolates except Klebsiella.

Conclusion: The bacteria contamination rate in the ICU was relatively high, mostly by Gram-negative organisms. Frequent profiling and sensitivity testing of the microbial load in the ICU are advocated to guide treatment.

尼日利亚东南部奥韦里联邦教学医院重症监护病房中常见微生物的测定:一项前瞻性、描述性横断面研究。
背景:重症监护病房(ICU)无生命表面的细菌污染和随后的微生物交叉传播可能在ICU获得性感染中起重要作用。目的:评价ICU常见的微生物及其敏感性。研究对象和方法:获得了研究所健康研究和伦理委员会的伦理许可。抽样涉及ICU内卫生工作者和病人经常接触的所有设备和家具以及空气。空气取样采用开板法,设备和家具表面取样采用棉签法。采用乳糖发酵和革兰氏染色等标准细菌学方法分离微生物生长,采用圆盘扩散法获得抗生素敏感性。结果:共采集标本66份,微生物生长36份(54.5%),开板法4份(11.1%),拭子法32份(88.9%)。革兰阴性菌27株(61.4%),革兰阳性菌9株(20.5%)。大肠杆菌26株(59.1%)、葡萄球菌9株(20.5%)、真菌8株(18.2%)、克雷伯氏菌1株(2.3%)次之。所有菌株对头孢曲松/舒巴坦和氧氟沙星敏感,但对augmentin、头孢克肟、头孢呋辛、头孢噻肟、红霉素、阿奇霉素和庆大霉素耐药。除克雷伯菌外,环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和亚胺培南对其余菌株均有效。结论:ICU细菌污染率较高,以革兰氏阴性菌为主。提倡经常对ICU的微生物负荷进行分析和敏感性检测,以指导治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信