Incidence of Accessory Navicular Bone among the Indian Population - An Original Article.

Prashant Pawar, Raj Pawar
{"title":"Incidence of Accessory Navicular Bone among the Indian Population - An Original Article.","authors":"Prashant Pawar, Raj Pawar","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i03.5400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of accessory navicular bone (ANB) among the Indian population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study consisted of 510 cases of which 1020 plain radiographs of both feet were taken (anteroposterior and lateral/oblique) belonging to the age group of 18 years and older of both genders. This study was conducted retrospectively from July 2023 to July 2024 in the Department of Orthopaedics and Radiology at a Tertiary level institute. Ethics approval number I.E.S.C./W/219/2024. The primary outcome to measure was the incidence of ANB in patients consulting the orthopedic outpatient department, and the secondary outcome measured the classification of ANB into its various subtypes and the total percentage of symptomatic ANB cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 1020 X-rays assessed (510 cases) and evaluated it was found that 125 cases showcased signs of ANB in them, which amounts to 24.5% of cases. The classification of ANB according to their subtypes showed that Type 2a-b and Type 1-a were the most prevalent 23 (18.4%) and 23 (18.4%), respectively. Out of the total 125 ANB cases, only 13 were symptomatic, whereas the remaining cases were asymptomatic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, the incidence of ANB in the Indian population was 24.5%, wherein the symptomatic incidence was 10.4%. Keeping this in mind, it is imperative to consider ANB as a differential diagnosis when treating medial-side foot pain. To our knowledge, this is the first paper of its kind that brings to light the incidence of ANB in clinical practice among the Indian population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"15 3","pages":"239-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i03.5400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of accessory navicular bone (ANB) among the Indian population.

Materials and methods: This study consisted of 510 cases of which 1020 plain radiographs of both feet were taken (anteroposterior and lateral/oblique) belonging to the age group of 18 years and older of both genders. This study was conducted retrospectively from July 2023 to July 2024 in the Department of Orthopaedics and Radiology at a Tertiary level institute. Ethics approval number I.E.S.C./W/219/2024. The primary outcome to measure was the incidence of ANB in patients consulting the orthopedic outpatient department, and the secondary outcome measured the classification of ANB into its various subtypes and the total percentage of symptomatic ANB cases.

Results: Out of the 1020 X-rays assessed (510 cases) and evaluated it was found that 125 cases showcased signs of ANB in them, which amounts to 24.5% of cases. The classification of ANB according to their subtypes showed that Type 2a-b and Type 1-a were the most prevalent 23 (18.4%) and 23 (18.4%), respectively. Out of the total 125 ANB cases, only 13 were symptomatic, whereas the remaining cases were asymptomatic.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the incidence of ANB in the Indian population was 24.5%, wherein the symptomatic incidence was 10.4%. Keeping this in mind, it is imperative to consider ANB as a differential diagnosis when treating medial-side foot pain. To our knowledge, this is the first paper of its kind that brings to light the incidence of ANB in clinical practice among the Indian population.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信